Analogue Productions and the Marley Family Announce Massive UHQR, SACD and Reel To Reel Bob Marley Catalog Reissue Series
a major score for AP and Bob Marley fans!
|
February 6th, 2025
Category:
News
|
2025-02-06 11:41:34 AM
Bigmule wrote:
Wonderful !!!!
“One good thing about music, is when it hits…..you feel no pain…”
2025-02-06 03:36:05 PM
Jeff 'Glotz' Glotzer wrote:
I really hope he trickles the releases in a staggered process. It's a lot to afford. In fact, I bought quite a few of the Jamaican reissues and while I love the UHQRs of Exodus and Rastaman Vibrations, I doubt my desire to re-purchase these yet again, all at once.
2025-02-06 04:01:30 PM
bwb wrote:
Not that I'm probably going to buy any, but I am curious about the tapes. What does "Sourced from original master tapes" mean?
They obviously can't keep playing the master over and over to make each copy so what is the process? Make a copy of the master that is then used to make each copy they are selling? If so, is the signal from the master somehow processed (remastered) to make this tape or is it a direct transfer of the master? Just curious..
2025-02-06 06:48:27 PM
Michael Fremer wrote:
The original tape gets played once. A lacquer is cut. The lacquer gets plated. The "father" is pulled from the plated lacquer. The father is a ridged not grooved piece of metal. It could be used to press records, and that would be a "one-step" record but the stamper can only be used so long before it wears out so the "father" is plated and it produced a grooved metal part called a "mother" (I'm surprised this 'sexist' language hasn't been retired. The "mother" gets plated again and it produces a ridges stamper that can press 1000+ copies. The "mother" can be plated many times without losing any quality. That's the process. Comprende?
2025-02-06 10:09:42 PM
bwb wrote:
Yo comprendo the explanation about how a record is created from the tape, but that does not explica how the tapes are made, which is what I was asking about.
2025-02-06 10:14:44 PM
bwb wrote:
Even for a record it seems unlikely that the original tape only gets played once. Since they are "Mastered from the original tapes" don't they have to listen to the master tape to decide what EQ if any is going to be applied as part of the mastering process before they cut the lacquer? Just curious
2025-02-07 12:19:54 PM
PeterPani wrote:
Maybe they make a straight digital HiRez-copy and use that. So it is still sourced from original master tape.
2025-02-07 01:34:02 PM
Steve Burke wrote:
Analogue Productions will not do it this way, it will be cut AAA from the original master
2025-02-07 02:34:25 PM
PeterPani wrote:
No way, they will get the permission to make 10+ copies of the mastertape, just to sell single tapes for $450 each.
2025-02-07 03:15:40 PM
bwb wrote:
The 33 and the 45 LPs say "Mastered from the original master tapes" , the SACD say "Mastered Direct To DSD" and the tapes say "Sourced from original master tapes , Transferred using ATR-modified Ampex Tape Machine with flux magnetic heads." It reads to me like they are making direct copies of the master tape but what does "transferred" actually mean? What does "Mastered from" actually mean?
IMHO they do themselves a disfavor by making such a vague statement that leads to all of this speculation. Seems like they would have learned something from the MoFi debacle, but since they leave us guessing they obviously did not. If they are asking $150 for a record and $450 for a tape the buyer deserves to know how it was produced. I for one, am not buying any of it.
2025-02-07 07:03:06 PM
PeterPani wrote:
They simply could print AAA on the vinyl sleeves and master copy all analog to Ultratape and everything would be clear. I stopped buying tapes since the Coltrane, because I get no infos.
2025-02-09 04:15:37 AM
Malachi Lui wrote:
correct, the R2R releases are made from a copy of the master. an EQ'd/mastered copy tape is made from the available master tape, then they duplicate the copy tape to the commercially released tapes. they have a room of a ton of machines recording the commercial tapes as the 2nd gen copy plays. so yes, they play the 2nd gen copy a few times to make the tapes they sell. the commercial tapes seem like a small run product due to how niche and expensive it is, so they're not running the first EQ'd copy to shreds.
2025-02-06 05:57:05 PM
Michael Weintraub wrote:
Would like to know if Catch a Fire is the original version, without the overdubs added later. The only decent sounding version of the original that I know of is a Japanese press. Never heard an original from Jamaica, but I've been told the pressings are quite poor.
2025-02-06 06:49:50 PM
Michael Fremer wrote:
I have a Jamaican pressing of "Burnin'" and the sound is quite good. It was pressed from an EMI produced stamper
2025-02-06 06:53:54 PM
anothercosta wrote:
Right, which version of "Catch A Fire"?
2025-02-07 04:25:24 PM
MrRom92 wrote:
The original version IS the one with the overdubs. The mix that strips everything back without the overdubs was made in the 2000’s, and likely only exists in a digital format anyway.
2025-02-07 06:37:06 PM
Michael Weintraub wrote:
Well, I have a Japanese pressing from 1974 that has no overdubs, and it's certainly not digital: https://www.discogs.com/release/6533105-The-Wailers-Catch-A-Fire The overdubs were added for the original American release, but I believe first Jamaican release does not have them either, but again, I have not heard one. Not sure about the UK version, but since it was released by Island I think it probably has the overdubs as well.
2025-02-07 05:23:42 AM
Willie Luncheonette wrote:
The version everyone knows with the overdubs is the better one. The added instrumentation is extremely well done and does not detract at all. Plus the running order is better. The Jamaican mix has two extra tracks that really do not add much and clog up the flow. The Jamaican mixes sound a little rougher in comparison but they do let the vocals come to the forefront and it is a joy hearing these three singers at their best. I would be very surprised if these are the Jamaican mixes but either way these reissues are most welcome.
2025-02-07 06:39:47 PM
Michael Weintraub wrote:
That was part of why I was wondering. If it's the one with the overdubs, it might be easier for me to justify the purchase, since it's different from the one I have. Not sure I agree with you about the overdubbed version being better, however, just different. Both versions have their merits, and it's terrific music either way. I like the stripped down sound of early Wailers recordings. My 1974 Japanese press sounds very nice.
2025-02-07 12:52:06 PM
Tom wrote:
Placed my order for all five of the Tapes and the three 33 albums. I figure this will be another 2/3 year effort.
2025-02-07 07:16:06 PM
Anton wrote:
I was feeling so wild and crazy yesterday that I bought a record I don’t already own!
Didn’t we all but reissues of this stuff last year?
2025-02-07 10:57:04 PM
Michael Weintraub wrote:
Chasing pressings is dangerously close to chasing the dragon: "I just know that this next version is the one, and then I'll be satisfied!" This way lies madness.
2025-02-12 01:10:42 AM
Johnny wrote:
But we’re all a little mad; so if I’m just a little more mad, that’s okay, right? It’s going to be hard to resist on some of these.
2025-02-12 01:10:44 AM
Johnny wrote:
But we’re all a little mad; so if I’m just a little more mad, that’s okay, right? It’s going to be hard to resist on some of these.