Acoustic Sounds
By: Michael Fremer

August 24th, 2024

Category:

Discography

"L.A. Woman" DCC Compact Classics, 45rpm and Plangent File Comparisons

you axed for it!

Here's what happened and why the original review did not include comparisons to the DCC Compact Classics version, the Sax cut double 45 and the Plangent processed edition: just as I'd done the original vs UHQR comparison, it was time for a major loudspeaker install so I was down for two days. Rather than wait I chose to post what I already had. Now here's the rest.

First, with the new speakers set up for review (Acora VRCs), I re-listened to tracks from O.G. and UHQR. Found the same results. Then I listened to the Doug Sax mastered double 45 box set Analogue Productions reissue, the D.C.C. Compact Classics edition mastered by Steve Hoffman and cut by Kevin Gray (serial #0021) and lastly the Plangent Processed file download.

It's hard to "love it madly" after so many plays of so many versions but it surely is possible because the band played so tightly and with such feverish stripped down inspiration—even if in retrospect it's like what happens with beautifully colored and patterned salt water fish becoming even more intensely colored just before they die.

Perhaps you've heard about the purported "Steve Hoffman mid bass bump"? Or maybe you've heard it—not that there's anything inherently wrong with that choice, depending upon the musical material—but were you to compare the D.C.C. Compact Classic edition of L.A. Woman with all of the others you'd easily hear Steve's trademarked "bump". It's on the D.C.C. but not on any of the others.

In fact, the top to bottom timbral balance is satisfyingly consistent among the others except for the original Artisan Sound, which is slightly but not excessively low frequently attenuated.

The problem with the "bump" here is that it adds a "chestiness" to Jim Morrison's voice that makes it sound as if he's got a chest cold. And it shrouds the leading edge to Krueger's searing guitar lines, adds a bit of unnecessary "thump" to Densmore's crispy snare and overall, it softens the entire ensemble's smack to the face, which is what you want to feel!

You'll know this is true in a comparison because the others—even the Artisan—don't sound thin and without low end "womp". They just sound right.

To ascertain the effects of inner groove high frequency loss I compared the title track on UHQR to the Sax cut double 45. These are both stupidly great cuts and which you prefer will depend upon tastes and your system. The UHQR has more "womp" that somewhat splits the mid-bass difference between the D.C.C. and the Sax cut but isn't nearly as heavily applied on the UHQR. It's a nice balance.

The Clarity's transient cleanliness produces spectacular cymbal clarity and lets you hear and feel the snare snap and the skin below. Whatever slight high frequency loss there may be resulting from groove radii getting smaller is minor in part because because the Clarity Vinyl quiet allowed a lower level cut without noise intrusion, which means the cut doesn't extend as close to the label as does either the original or the D.C.C.

If you own the Sax cut double 45 and don't mind getting up five times (four to change sides, one to take a leak) you're all set. If you own the D.C.C. or the original and you want a noticeable sonic upgrade the UHQR and the double 45 provide one.

As for the Plangent file, well it proves a few things: first that "digital" (using a good DAC—mine's the dCS Vivaldi One Apex) has gotten much better than a decade ago, second that the Plangent Process removes a layer of grit (in this case not as huge a one as I've heard in some A/B demos conducted by its inventor Jamie Howarth), third that great vinyl playback and this level of great digital playback are approaching parity (though the spectacular digital bass on "L' America" might turn some of you into digital converts yet there's still a slight loss of overall transparency IMO compared to the vinyl) and of course you don't have to get up more than once (to hit the john).

I'm done here other than to write that the Plangent file and the UHQR sounded the most similar.

Comments

  • 2024-08-24 04:57:52 PM

    ghn5ue wrote:

    Thanks for doing this comparison in a way that it deserves to be done. While a major stereo magazine is now publishing vinyl reviews using ripped files from the 'net to make comparisons, it is refreshing to hear someone actually has all the required versions to do properly. It is not that I don't find comparing rips to have any value, it is still not an absolute when you consider all the variables involved so therefore belongs more to web forums, You Tube videos and comments sections. Often when I do these sorts of comparisons from ripped files, then follow up with a comparing the actual records I find my preferences change. Well done vinyl rips can tell us some things, but not all things, which of course is why we play records and not just listen to ripped files!

    • 2024-08-25 05:54:08 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      Using files means “late to the fair” if you know what I mean….

  • 2024-08-24 05:48:25 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Great comparison and I agree especially with one finding: in my words… 1) the typical Hoffman choices and his focus on the main instrument/voice can do magic especially on several less well produced Rock/Pop releases (which is why I not rarely like it for this genre), but can go in an odd direction on others.

    Anyway, I bet also he swears that most remasterings were flat transfers, just as every remastering engineer does ;-) So maybe a lot we hear is rather the equipment used than EQ choices…

  • 2024-08-25 02:19:18 AM

    Spin The Black Circle wrote:

    Thanks for this great review!

  • 2024-08-25 03:11:17 PM

    Paul Robertson wrote:

    Thank you for this.

    Double 45, as I suspected, check, I’m good!

    Regarding said bathroom breaks, I’m older now and have to spring up on the reg for them regardless, so again I’m good!

  • 2024-08-25 06:25:08 PM

    Rashers wrote:

    Thanks Micheal - I don’t have any of these versions. I do have the Rhino 2021 box set that included a 33rpm record cut by Bernie Grundman. I’m not sure if the provenance but suspect digital. By any chance have you hear that mass market version and how it compares?

    • 2024-08-25 11:51:39 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      Have not heard

      • 2024-08-26 12:53:06 AM

        Tom wrote:

        That LP was Plangent processed cut by Bernie. It’s close to this new UHQR. Personally my favorite is still the 45 issue. IMO it’s more tape like very neutral sounding. The new UHQR while very good has a touch of midrange warmth which I think many with prefer.

        • 2024-08-27 03:38:25 PM

          Jeff 'Glotz' Glotzer wrote:

          Thanks for your input here! Very nice comparison as well.

  • 2024-08-27 05:16:29 AM

    TJH wrote:

    Many thanks for those comparisons. Being undecided whether to go AP 45 or 33, I listened to a Rhino HQ-180 33 cut by Grundman released in 2009. For a fraction of above’s prices it sounded so excellent on my high end gear in my room that I can easily forgive to consider to buy any of the ASs which „re-releases“ seem to get more and more repetitive in the reissue market and at too high of a price. Hopefully AS will have something more exciting and exclusive up their sleeves in future.

  • 2024-08-27 03:38:51 PM

    Jeff 'Glotz' Glotzer wrote:

    Yesssss! Thank you, Michael! Who else loves us as much as you do?? No one!

    The Doors releases were pretty anemic in the bass range and maybe I want that mid-bass bump, but as you state I probably wouldn't after a few plays. Thank you for such a comprehensive overview of all releases.