Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra
Rhino High Fidelity reel to reel tapes
By: Malachi Lui

October 10th, 2025

Category:

News

Rhino High Fidelity Launches Reel-To-Reel Series With T. Rex and Yes

A first listen at Innovative Audio NYC

Last night at Innovative Audio in East Midtown NYC and The Audio Salon in Santa Monica, CA, Rhino launched a new reel-to-reel series under their High Fidelity banner. The first two titles are Yes’ The Yes Album and T. Rex’s Electric Warrior, each limited to 500 copies and retailing for $299.98 (a bundle with both sells for $569.98).

Duplicated in real time from 1:1 flat master tape copies, the Rhino High Fidelity R2R tapes are 10.5” diameter, 15ips, 1/4” IEC reels on Recording The Masters LPR90 tape stock. RTM in France also does the duplication, and Steve Woolard produces the RHF tape series. The tapes are delivered “tails out” so you have to carefully rewind them onto an empty reel before playback. These are essentially third-generation master tapes, retailing for significantly less than similar releases from other companies whose licensing costs increase the price.

At Innovative Audio, a small group of press heard The Yes Album and Electric Warrior Rhino tapes played on a rebuilt Otari MX-5050 deck fed through D’Agostino preamps and amps, Transparent cables, and Wilson Audio speakers. A reliable system featuring components I’ve heard before, so I’m confident in my sonic assessment’s accuracy.

Innovative Audio NYC

For a new ultra-deluxe audiophile series in a niche, rarefied format (whose barrier to basic entry is thousands of dollars), these two albums are an interesting selection. While The Yes Album and Electric Warrior are musically significant classics, they’re not great sounding recordings. Good, but not great, unlike Rhino High Fidelity’s vinyl titles most of which started out as some flavor of sonically “great.” We’re trying to get more information about the R2R curation mentality.

First up on the Otari was Yes’ 1971 breakthrough The Yes Album, recorded and mixed at Advision Studios in London. This is a compressed mix to begin with, though the Rhino tape sounds good. The lack of vinyl surface noise and subsonic rumble meant that the tape has stunning black backgrounds (though despite the original master being Dolbyed, I still heard some hiss on the Rhino consumer tape), as well as clean sibilants, reasonably tight bass, and nice separation of multitracked vocals. The last songs of the original LP’s respective sides sound best, especially “Starship Trooper,” with guitar solos beautifully floating in space and the ending Moog(?) bass being truly impressive. The organ at the end of “I’ve Seen All Good People”’s first part perfectly rings into the abyss. There’s a slight midbass fog and an absence of the highest frequencies throughout the Rhino High Fidelity The Yes Album, though that might be inherent to the original master tape. As I say with Electric Recording Company vinyl releases (cut with no deliberate signal processing, even if their vintage tube system imparts a stronger sonic character than turning a knob ever would), some albums need mastering and have issues without it; after all, none of these artists intended for us to hear their flat master tapes, even if that’s what they heard in the studio.

The Yes Album tape box scan

Each Rhino R2R comes with an insert featuring tape specs, playback instructions, and photos of the original master tape boxes. The Yes Album’s master tape comes from Advision Studios, as Yes was signed to Atlantic on both sides of the ocean. T. Rex’s Electric Warrior is a different case: Fly Records originally released it in the UK, while Reprise/Warner always had it in North America. Universal now has Electric Warrior in the rest of the world. The “original” tape box scans in the Rhino Electric Warrior R2R have Warner Brothers, Hollywood information on the top, yet it’s marked “MASTER.” While some of the album was tracked in America, it was mixed and assembled in London, so what is the original master tape? Is the Warner master the true original repackaged in a different tape box, or is it a second generation copy? Did Marc Bolan and Tony Visconti run off two mixdown tapes simultaneously?

I don’t have those answers yet, but what I do know is that I find Rhino High Fidelity’s Electric Warrior consumer tape a bit disappointing. Bolan’s voice is often low in the mix already, yet many editions (regardless of format) carve out a clear space for it. On the Rhino R2R, he’s shrouded in midbass murkiness, sometimes to the point of being unintelligible. When I noticed this on opener “Mambo Sun,” I was sitting in the front row of Innovative’s showroom; moving further back helped the higher frequencies cut through, but the rest of the album wasn’t drastically better. The drum fills towards the end of “Cosmic Dancer” don’t have the precise transient texture I’m used to, electric guitars aren’t nearly as sharp as I hoped, and while “Bang A Gong (Get It On)” has a wide, expansive soundstage, Bolan’s voice is again hidden. Songs with sparser arrangements like “Monolith” and “Girl” fare better with solid physicality, and other songs have a few parts that pop out nicely (the horn at the end of “Rip Off,” the lead guitar on “The Motivator”), but overall it’s smooth yet cloudy and thick.

Electric Warrior will also get a Rhino High Fidelity vinyl reissue this December, though I’m not sure it really needs it. Kevin Gray already did an AAA cut for Rhino in 2017 (pressed at RTI and packaged in a laminated tip-on gatefold), so I can’t imagine much difference or improvement. I haven’t played the 2017 reissue in a while but I remember it sounding decent.

Despite my reservations about the Electric Warrior Rhino R2R, this new edition of The Yes Album is easy to recommend to diehard fans with the gear to play it. I’m interested to see where this series goes. The reel-to-reel format is neither practical, common, or remotely affordable, and considering these are flat transfers with all the potential surprises that come with that, it’s a pretty big way to test what audiophile consumers’ sonic preferences actually are, and which albums they’ll spend $300 for.

Otari tape deck

Comments

  • 2025-10-10 10:46:41 AM

    Tom wrote:

    The Otari is not the greatest sounding deck to judge these tapes by. The internal electronics are at best mediocre. You have a negative tone to this review. We should be celebrating this release, great titles at reasonable prices. I understand this is a vinylcentric site but nothing sounds as great as most of these current tape releases.

    • 2025-10-10 12:15:40 PM

      David M wrote:

      I agree. Not only does Rhino have a deep catalog but they are currently selling these for $299 per reel, well below AP’s $599. I ordered The Yes Album and can’t wait for the next set of titles.

      • 2025-10-23 12:21:36 PM

        Oswaldo Martinez wrote:

        The decrease in price is mainly due to the fact the Rhino product is one reel, not the traditional 2-reel affair like the AP's Ultra Tape product. The AP Ultra Tape series are recorded on thicker 1.5 mil tape.

        These Rhino tapes are done on thinner 1 mil tape, and thus, the complete album now fits in a single reel greatly decreasing parts cost.

        If the Rhino tapes were done with thicker 1.5 mil tape then it would have to be a two-reel situation which would then cause the price to increase to $599.

        This is not an "apples to apples" comparison price wise.

        Regards!

    • 2025-10-10 12:52:30 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I think he gave an honest accounting of what he heard not a negative toned one. He can only judge by the machine they had on hand. And I thought he was very positive about the Yes album.

    • 2025-10-10 12:56:21 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      We are not a "vinyl centric" site. I hope we are an "honest not cheerleading" site. I'm glad Rhino is doing these tapes as is Malachi. He produced an honest report based on what he heard. I'm sure other sites will cheerlead for you if that's what you wish to have. But is it really what you want?

      • 2025-10-10 01:26:35 PM

        Come on wrote:

        I’m so happy to occasionally read pointed opinions instead of the usual promotions at all, that I even wouldn’t care if they are fully justified or not. A different take on things can fortunately be discussed in the comments.

        As Chad recently pointed out in an interview, manufacturers certainly appreciate promotion and a quietly buying mass. But I think he mainly directed this to YouTube trolls.

      • 2025-10-10 01:50:40 PM

        Come on wrote:

        ...and I meant I regularly read it from both of you fortunately. Better even an exaggerated, arrogant or harsh opinion and a bit of entertainment than boredom.

      • 2025-10-10 06:28:14 PM

        Todd wrote:

        You aren’t a vinyl centric site? Doesn’t seem like a negative description to argue against. I’m here to read about vinyl. Which is fine. It’s also fine to report on other audiophile offerings.

        • 2025-10-10 06:39:51 PM

          Come on wrote:

          I’d say the OP referred to possible biased reporting of vinyl centric vs. tape centric communities about what makes more or less sense or sounds better or worse. He implied Malachis report about the limited sq of the tape he heard could have to do with a vinyl bias.

      • 2025-10-11 05:09:47 PM

        Tom wrote:

        Of course I want an honest review BUT I you went to a release of a one step pressing of a classic album and they only had a U Turn turntable with a $99 cartridge, could you give it a fair assessment? Like cartridges, phono stages contribute the sound of a record, tape heads and deck electronics do the same for tape. Maybe it would have been best to hold off publishing the article until it could have been better addressed. Using that system with the weakest of front ends was ridiculous.

        • 2025-10-12 03:12:36 AM

          Malachi Lui wrote:

          i don't have a reel-to-reel player myself, and rhino's PR people hosted this event at innovative to demonstrate to press how these tapes sound. i cannot judge the quality of the otari deck, but in no world would they deliberately try to make their new $300 tapes sound bad for journalists whose reports influence people's purchasing decisions. sure, they probably could've gotten an objectively higher end tape deck in there if they wanted to, but the otari was what was available and perhaps it was meant to give a more realistic portrayal of what these tapes would sound like for many buyers (despite the wilson audio speakers and d'agostino electronics adding up to equal the cost of a house). you could also argue that those already in the market for these tapes might have something nicer than the otari deck. i wouldn't know.

          i also don't know if the revival of consumer r2r releases is solely meant to cater to the few who already have capabilities to play 15ips 10.5" reels, or if it's meant to get more people into the format. time will tell, these types of releases in general are all fairly recent and it's an expensive format. it's also taken a while for r2r decks of this specification to be available right off the shelf without the hassle of the buyer having to get it serviced to even use it.

          • 2025-10-12 10:55:14 PM

            vinyl_fiend wrote:

            I want to be super clear about my comment below on the Otari: I agree with what you're saying, and I do NOT think the salon was trying to make these sound bad at all. Quite the opposite. As you said, that's probably the best they could find, but when you have that kind of electronics and speakers, you're going to hear more of what the source can't really do. Bummer they couldn't get something a little better because it would've been the better reveal for sure.

            The Otari sounds OK, it's just not high end (like the rest of that setup). Like plugging a Rega P3 into that. Good, usable, and a workhorse, but could be a lot better.

            My experience with 7" 7.5ips commercial tapes from the 70s and 80s is pretty good -- they have a stability and sense of movement vinyl doesn't quite have. Maybe lack the dynamics but it all glues together well. Maybe they could make better 7.5ips tapes, or even run 7" reels at 15ips, if a decent market appeared.

            • 2025-10-13 07:17:08 PM

              Michael Fremer wrote:

              "...they have a stability and sense of movement vinyl doesn't quite have..." The Wilson-Benesch turntable gets really close or is there....

              • 2025-10-14 12:14:11 PM

                Tom wrote:

                Really Michael, using a $372K turntable and saying it “gets really close”. Can’t we just agree that the source used by the store was far less than deserving for this roll out.

                • 2025-10-15 11:15:16 PM

                  Michael Fremer wrote:

                  Yes absolutely but I believe Rhino not the store chose the machine. I will find out…

        • 2025-10-13 07:14:47 PM

          Michael Fremer wrote:

          It's the system supplied to the store by Rhino I believe...

        • 2025-10-16 06:12:25 AM

          AnalogJ wrote:

          If the cause of the Electric Warrior tape sounding so poor was the Otari, then would that negate that Malachi thought the Yes tape sounded so good?? Which is it? The Otari is at least capable of some level of discernment.

    • 2025-10-10 07:39:26 PM

      VQR wrote:

      If the Otari unit was rebuilt as stated, it probably sounds far better than stock. I have trouble imagining that an audio salon would showcase a new, exciting release with a mediocre tape deck...

      • 2025-10-10 10:54:03 PM

        vinyl_fiend wrote:

        Really don't want to be "that guy" but the MX-5050 is indeed mediocre at best. Great for fast editing of radio spots and program reels in the 80s, and VOs in studios.

        As someone who owns an MX-5050 BII, and who spent (wasted?) the time and money to recap every board, (power supply, control, all the bipolar and nonpolar caps in the audio circuits, the motor caps, etc), as well as the rollers, and tape guides on the tension arms, I can assure that if it is using ANY of the stock electronics, even tuned up, it sounds pretty bad. The noise floor without tape moving is high. That pic appears to me that both rollers are original and very worn. You have to take the head output direct to an outboard bottlehead or other specific high-spec preamp to get anything decent, and the tape guide mods and other transport tweaks are essential to get the top end air and ease tape does so well.

        It's a sturdy deck that handles tape well and doesn't sound awful, but it wouldn't highlight anything noteworthy without entirely different outputs.

  • 2025-10-10 12:06:29 PM

    Todd wrote:

    I think Rhino knows that every single active owner of working R2R will buy every release. It's a slam dunk.

    • 2025-10-10 12:53:18 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      We will surely find out. I'm going to get the Yes album.

      • 2025-10-23 12:12:45 PM

        Oswaldo Martinez wrote:

        Ha! So Michael, what tape deck do you have or will acquire? I don't recall you ever talking about owning (or my ever seeing) a reel-to-reel tape deck in your man cave! But if so, EXCITING ! ! !

        • 2025-10-23 03:59:30 PM

          PeterPani wrote:

          As far as I know Michael had a Revox A700 refurbished somewhen in the last two years. He mentioned it in this site, once.

  • 2025-10-10 01:57:06 PM

    Azmoon wrote:

    This news of this series is as exciting as watching paint dry.

  • 2025-10-10 07:31:54 PM

    Kevin wrote:

    I had a Tandberg 10X back in the 70’s. Coolest piece of gear I had. Loved the fact that I could press “play” from rewind or FF and it would slow down, stop, and start playing. Impressed my friends, but after a year I sold it. Why? Because it was a PITA. Almost nothing prerecorded to buy, so I wound up mostly recording vinyl to tape. People would ask me to play a specific track, and cuing was such a hassle. Much easier to put on the vinyl. I’m mystified regarding R2R’s resurgent popularity, but to each their own 😌. Btw, the Rhino High Fidelity vinyl edition Yes Album is a 10 in my opinion.

    • 2025-10-10 07:37:31 PM

      Kevin wrote:

      Correction, meant Atlantic 75 release of The Yes Album.

      • 2025-10-15 11:20:25 PM

        Michael Fremer wrote:

        The original Atlantic sounds better IMO. I got into a disagreement with a reader about that last year and we had an agreement: he’d bring the 75 reissue to I think Audio Advice show last year or maybe Cap or AXPONA. Can’t remember! I brought original Presswell and in two minutes it was over: original won…far superior bass extension and dynamics. Otherwise both were good

    • 2025-10-10 07:37:44 PM

      VQR wrote:

      There is no RHF of The Yes Album. The only RHF of any Yes album was Relayer, which some people found to be lacking compared to an original Porky cut.

  • 2025-10-10 07:45:18 PM

    VQR wrote:

    Are both releases supposed to be 3rd generation tapes, or no? Given how Rhino have played fast and loose with the meaning of 'original master tapes,' I would be surprised if either release weren't from the 'US masters' which could already be 2nd or higher generations.

    Already the RHF of Yes "Relayer" was cut from an American copy tape. Would the original (presumably UK) master even be available to Rhino US? Ditto with the T-Rex as you discussed, Malachi.

    • 2025-10-12 04:05:46 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      they're supposed to be third generation tapes, at least third generation away from warner's vault master. 'the yes album' RHF tape is indeed third generation as the scan of the original master tape box shows that it's indeed the master (while the insert on 'relayer' clearly shows it's a copy tape). warner has all the tapes in their vaults around the world, and keep in mind that over the decades, labels have moved their tape assets around a bit (especially when all the labels got absorbed into four, then three, majors).

      but yes, the t. rex rhino r2r is almost certainly a fourth gen tape, unless someone from warner tells us otherwise. technically third generation in relativity to warner's vault master, but warner's vault master is already a second generation tape to begin with.

      it's good that warner/rhino have been so committed to using tapes when they can, but they've been vague sometimes with the high fidelity series. 'original' tape to them isn't always original original

  • 2025-10-11 02:05:05 AM

    Mark wrote:

    First off, I respect and applaud 'telling it as it is' opinion. That is Step #1 in building trust. Not naming names (oh, ok...Analog Planet) but some websites are just mouthpieces for the industry. I have zero trust for such sites, and I notice the option to comment as such (on AP) has been removed. Dissent appears to have fallen out of favour recently...

    Second, these R2R rigs bring out some sort of primal lust in me - they are gorgeous - the first photo in this article is premium grade hifi porn. (I'll get my meds).

    Finally, my love of The Yes Album remains undiminished after 40 plus years of it being part of my musical baggage. I own several copies, however: the Steven Wilson edition is the one I pull out when I just want to sit back and be entertained - I rate it highly. Having said that the Atlantic 75 45rpm cut is defo on my wishlist.

    In the meantime, I will continue to ogle at the reel crumpet.

  • 2025-10-11 08:35:02 AM

    Cal Zone wrote:

    Pardon my ignorance but if the transfer of the analog 3rd gen master is going through a DAW and DAC setup doesn't that add a digital steps rendering these tapes not much different than hi res tape dupes of a CD? Also I own a Pioneer RT 707 deck which adore. It does not accept 10" reels nor play 15ips. Do you think that commercially released 7.5ips 7" reels will ever be produced again? I mean people by Rhino Reserve lps and play them on their Crosleys? Many labels are still releasing indie music on cassettes...there is still a cassette culture. Why not produced hi-q (albeit not true audiophile) 7" reels for consumers like me? Maybe retail price could be roughly 2x vinyl price? $60-80? Many of my commercially released 7.5" tapes from the 60' - 70s sound amazing if they were well taken care of. Can a guy dream?

    • 2025-10-11 09:16:18 AM

      David M wrote:

      What makes you think the tape duplication includes a digital step? It does not.

    • 2025-10-12 02:25:00 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      there's nothing digital here, nor did i mention digital whatsoever in my this report. they start by taking the vault master and making a 1:1 TAPE copy of it, then the consumer tapes are duplicated from the second generation copy (so they're selling third generation master tapes, NO digital whatsoever).

      cassette culture is more of an aesthetic thing than an audiophile market, though i wish someone would come along and start making high-grade type IV metal cassettes (and good playback gear) again. right now, all the commercial cassette releases are type I ferric tape, and all duplicated from digital anyway.

      the rhino tapes are 15ips 10.5" reels because that's the ultra-premium format and this is an ultra-premium line. sure, more people have 7" 7.5ips capability, but that's not quite the premium, top-of-the-line format that this is meant to be. tape stock is also expensive now so even if they did smaller 7.5ips releases, you'd probably still be paying $150.

  • 2025-10-11 09:02:56 AM

    MrRom92 wrote:

    the first 2 titles do nothing for me but I will eagerly look forward to whatever they do next in this series. This is really some of the best audiophile news ever as far as I’m concerned. There is NOTHING quite like the master tape sound.

    • 2025-10-11 09:33:23 AM

      PeterPani wrote:

      Agree fully. Both I do not need to get at an audiophile level. But I look forward to interesting future tapes. Besides of the aging Tapeproject there are 3 interesting high quality outlets: Horch/Revox with a fantastic catalog (if you like classical music), Ultratape (some fantastic tapes) and - to me - most interesting - Hemiolia, they do stunning mastering of the mastertapes: their Miles Davis reels (incl. KOB) and other jazz are absolutely top notch. It is good to see a new supplier of the second best consumer carrier, as tape is!

      • 2025-10-11 10:09:22 AM

        Come on wrote:

        I had a Revox R2R long ago, but I’m not tape market experienced. Would always be interested in opinions about the influence of pressing process generation losses (vinyl) vs tape generation losses (commercial tapes) and the influence of the fact that commercial tapes are usually either unmastered (in case of „no need“ sometimes fine but not always) or from an again additional production master generation.

      • 2025-10-13 07:22:48 PM

        Michael Fremer wrote:

        Hemiolia is not using master tapes. They did not get the master 2 track mix down of KOB. I know that for a fact. They probably got a copy that was in Europe from way back when. Then they make a copy that someone masters and that becomes the master and then they make duplicates. I would put the AP 45rpm UHQR KOB played on my TT up against that tape played on any machine. Let's do it!

        • 2025-10-14 10:49:04 AM

          PeterPani wrote:

          I am pretty sure that they did not have the "mastertape". And I am pretty sure that in most cases all the others do not have always the mastertape, too. Most of the time they will use a copy of th 3rd or 4th generation, but nobody knows for sure, except sometimes few people. I used the word mastertape sloppy, Hemiolia mastered from a tape closer to the source than I owned(?). Not sure about that because I own original commercial 7,5 ips of KOB. And one was distributed as 2 track promotion Columbia tape. I would love to compare the tape with the UHQR! But there is an ocean between us. In May is the High End 2026 here in Vienna (following Munich). You could bring your vinyl equipment with you!

    • 2025-10-11 09:57:08 AM

      MrRom92 wrote:

      My only point of contention is that these are being duplicated on LPR90. For those who want the best it would be nice to see an option given in the future for higher grade tape at an upcharge. Or just make a change for the rest of the series from here on out. These should really be on SM900 or 911

      • 2025-10-11 02:17:59 PM

        David M wrote:

        Use of that tape stock would require 2 reels per album and significantly increase the cost. While 1.5mil tape is preferred, I am fine with getting these albums on 1mil tape for $300.

      • 2025-10-19 11:07:43 AM

        Tor J wrote:

        Agreed, with other companies you have a choice, there is more dynamics on the best tapes but also more expensive as mentioned. I have been buying tapes for several years now and think it is great that Rhino is coming on the scene, there are not too many rock titles out there so I hope we will see some classics on tape eventually. This Yes tape is on its way so I look forward to warming up the Studer to check it out.

  • 2025-10-11 10:08:44 AM

    Georges wrote:

    My policy is to each his own opinion as long as it's well-reasoned. Which is always the case in the articles here, I think. There's a problem when a tape recorder plays tapes he didn't record himself. Among other things, I had a B77 19/38 2-track, and a friend who owned a studio said he only replayed what he had recorded on the same machine (he had a Hencot 800, I think, a very nice machine). Unfortunately, I couldn't find any pre-recorded tapes to play back on it. This may also be the case for cassettes, where the case plays a role as well (I sometimes had to take them apart to put the -very thin- tape back in another one), but with my Teac 1010, I can't compare; nothing can be easily fixed. So all our problems were finally solved (for me and the studio) by Sony DAT. With lossless copies.

  • 2025-10-11 02:19:40 PM

    George white wrote:

    I wish I could afford tape hobby, but for anyone lucky enough to afford it, I wish you luck and hope the hobby grows!😊

  • 2025-10-12 09:16:32 AM

    Georges wrote:

    Why not duplicate the masters at 30 ips (76 cm) /sec? There would be less hiss and other benefits (saturation - distortion, frequency response, dynamics, wow, and flutter). Here too, a few copies of musical excerpts would help, because still, almost $300, uhey!

  • 2025-10-12 11:21:32 AM

    PeterG wrote:

    Thanks, Malachi. After seeing countless posts about this on the interwebs, I finally feel like I understand what's actually been released--something that might portend future excitement, but is just OK, not quite ready for prime time, now.

    These critiques of "your" reliance on this particular tape deck are silly. RHF hosted an event at one of the best stereo stores anywhere, and played through absolutely killer amps/speakers.

    All in all, a great example of how one professional review can be more valuable than a hundred forum posts

    • 2025-10-13 07:24:37 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      Amen....he reported what he saw and heard and that's the job!

  • 2025-10-13 06:33:36 PM

    Bob Donnelly wrote:

    The Otari is a very good deck. If it is set up right it sounds great. The preamp is not the best but so what, it is very capable of telling you what's on the tape. To say otherwise tells me you don't really know. If the the T Rex is an un-mastered transfer, that is probably why it's lacking.

  • 2025-10-13 06:37:58 PM

    Bob Donnelly wrote:

    Oh, and thank you for the informative review!

  • 2025-10-14 05:45:05 PM

    cracking resonance wrote:

    It‘s great that this is not a vinyl only site. It‘s a great site for a variety of high quality analog music replay. I love all this tape gear, and would love to dig deeper into. But it‘s tried and true, once you stuck a bunch of money into R2R world, you‘ll never see it again, neither in consistent audio quality, nor in long-term operation, and there‘s not much to tweak about a R2R system without being hardcore into electronics or buying the cheaper end machine to have it rebuilt to newest hyper gear and cost standard.

    There‘s only one that serves the population of an average salaire up to the most potent gold donkeys - and that is vinyl. Any excuse that requires a .25M argument is a failed argument from the start. Vinyl works excellently well below that game, I couldn‘t care less, complicated solutions for non existing problems. Go get a Mars rocketship instead of a serious car. And for them who say, it‘s all available on streaming. Great! Why spending money on black round dust-collectors, stay there.

    Those dust-collectors will stay with me, I sold not a single record and only 2 got lost in lending in my hole life, and I will work to keep it that way.

    And so will my gear just be refined, not replaced, over time. Not a penny go to the greedy industry no more or to the ones with nice gear, that fails support years after as shops close and even excellent icon vinyl gear master say hello to another world. My record player keeps turning. The best gear choice one can make in a life, already then, in the 80s, the 90s, the 2000s, next to a pedal-bike, a fountain pen and good writing paper. Now adding glasses to it. ;-) If the market continues to raise pricing and FOMOrgasmic marketing, I‘ll pay no attention to that, but stick with the thousand creations of musical art I own, only my energy bill to pay and some drops of oil and a piece of rubberwheel here and there.

  • 2025-10-16 01:24:26 AM

    Adrian Wu wrote:

    Releasing on 7.5ips makes sense since 48 minutes can be fitted onto a 7" reel with 1mil tape. This will reduce the price substantially. A 10.5 metal reel costs at least $30 and tape cost is halved. There is a 2dB increase in hiss compared to 15 ips. but with low generation copies, this will be hardly noticeable. HF response might not be as good, but with good electronics, it is possible to get a flat response up to 20kHz. Some of the commercial 2-track releases from the 1950s are the best sounding tapes in my collection, and compare favourably with my studio master tapes.

  • 2025-10-16 02:01:20 AM

    Audx wrote:

    If I could afford it, I would have it. I hope that you'll continue to cover these releases.

  • 2025-10-18 10:04:53 AM

    Tom wrote:

    I received both tapes yesterday, so far I only listened to the T Rex. Playback was via a Studer with Flux Magnetic head through a Doshi Tape Preamp, Pass amplification with Wilson’s. This is one of my favorite albums, I have every version from a 1st issue UK and US along with every reissue on vinyl and digital. It’s a typical early seventies pop/rock recording which means it’s ok but nothing to write home about. I disagree with Malachi, the vocals are not recessed they sound exactly like every version I’ve heard. The lower end is bloated but better than any of the US pressings. If you compare the original UK LP with either the original US or the Kevin Gray’s cut there is a distinct difference but I don’t think it’s because of tape generations. The UK was cut HOT, with a push in the top end giving it a more aggressive sound which frankly does the music justice, especially played through teenage radios and players of that time. The tape faithfully captures the sound of the US versions with slightly tighter mid bass and a tiny bit more extension. IMO this is a questionable first release by Rhino.

    • 2025-10-19 05:56:43 PM

      Bill Stuebe wrote:

      I order both tapes which should be arriving tomorrow. My Technics RS-1520 should come this week or next week. I had it upgraded by J-Corder. I will connect the tape head output to my Titan III tape head preamp, that will connect to my Mcintosh C1100 preamp and my Mcintosh MC462 amp. My speakers are Paradigm Founder 120h's. I will listen to them and report back. Thanks for all the great comments!

  • 2025-10-20 02:43:41 PM

    Ultraism wrote:

    I have an Otari MX5050bII 2 and I'm playing the Yes tape I just received as I type. Terrible. I'm no expert but all of my other tapes (Hemiolia, Horch House, Tape Project, Analogue productions) sound significantly better on my system. The jazz Hemiolia titles, which cost $1000 to get to me here in the US, are worth every penny and this $300 Yes tape is most certainly not. Tape is expensive and a pain in the butt but I tolerate that because it provides the best sonics I've heard. If a tape doesn't do this, I'm not interested in taking the extra time and spending the extra (significant) money for it. I'd rather stream. I hate to bash any label moving into tape because I want more, not fewer, titles available. But maybe Rhino will hear us and figure out how to do better. Until I read rave reviews, this is the last Rhino tape I'll be purchasing.

    • 2025-10-20 02:57:04 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      fair enough. as i said in my report, the yes tape to my ears "sounds good" - not terrible, but not really great. i've admittedly not heard any LP pressings of that album, i've only streamed it, but it's a very compressed mix and i thought it was an odd choice, especially paired with the t. rex which is probably a slightly better mix to begin with but still no audiophile wonder. interested to see where rhino takes this series if they continue with it

      • 2025-10-20 06:28:37 PM

        Ultraism wrote:

        Maybe saying it sounds "terrible" was an overstatement and should have been used only in comparison to the high end jazz titles I have. I'll be comparing the Yes tape to streaming once my dac is back up and running. I reread your review and your observations, IMO, were right on the money, although I didn't hear any hiss on my tape. I also just finished listening to the T Rex tape (I bought the package) and the first thing I thought was that I couldn't hear his voice...something you also bought up. You're right: It's very strange, these two first selections.