Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra
Pet Sounds Definitive Sound Series
By: Michael Fremer

March 24th, 2026

Category:

News

The Upcoming Definitive Sound Series "Pet Sounds" One-Step Will be The Best Sounding "Pet Sounds" Ever Released

a stunning mono reissue cut directly from tape definitely made for these times

Despite its stature today as one of the greatest and most influential records in rock history, Pet Sounds was kind of a rush job. In late 1965 Brian Wilson met jingle writer/lyricist Tony Asher at an L.A. recording studio and shortly thereafter the two began writing the songs. By April it had mostly been completed. Considering the complexity of the compositions, arrangements and production, that's an impressive feat in such a short time. It was also expensive, costing more than a half million in today's dollars. True, Wilson worked at a feverish pace.

Inspired by Phil Spector's "Wall of Sound" production ideas and motivated by The Beatles album Rubber Soul, Wilson set out to create a unified concept album that dealt mostly with post adolescent, thoughtful adult themes set to sophisticated musical compositions influenced by jazz, classical, exotica and other musical genres not normally associate with rock and influenced by Phil Spector's "Wall of Sound" production techniques and mixed to mono because Brian couldn't hear stereo.

Everyone more or less knows that part of the story. The record was released May 16th 1966 in monophonic sound—which at that point was the rock standard—and awful "Duophonic" fake stereo sound and packaged in among the most awful cover art and graphic design ever for a rock record. The cover art looked slapped together in a hurry, bore no resemblance to the music on the record and did no favors to The Beach Boys' waning popularity. Whoever cut the lacquers did an equally horrendous job because the original pressings sound atrocious.

By the late '60s the group has reached its nadir and the relationship between Capitol and the band dissolved. The drama that followed is best for a book that's probably written and published but eventually Mo Ostin signed the band to Reprise Records and crafted the deal to create The Beach Boys own label Brother Records.

Getting to the New One-Step Release!

In August of 1970 Brother Records released Sunflower the first on the new label and despite Brian's bum ear, it was recorded in real stereo (and not muliti-miked and panned across a fake soundstage). The jacket even mentioned the Hafler passive surround sound format because a genuine phase coherent stereo recording would produce good surround results. The Artisan Sound mastered record sounded great and contained many outstanding songs. Ostin even wrote some back jacket notes.

In May of 1972, Brother/Reprise released So Tough by "Carl and the Passions", featuring a new Beach Boys lineup that included Ricky Fataar and Blondie Chaplin. The Beach Boys had recently bought back some of its back Capitol catalog and when another bonus album didn't materialize, Brother chose to pair So Tough with Pet Sounds—both Artisan Sound mastered. The record was a commercial failure, some even blaming the juxtaposition of the two albums—one great, one not— that made So Tough appear worse than it really is was. In 1976 Brother Records issued a stand alone re-release of this same version of Pet Sounds packaged in a brown-ish jacket.

And there things sat as vinyl faded into the sunset. So Tough was forgotten. Almost twenty years passed—a generation—and then in 1995 DCC Compact Classics chose to reissue Pet Sounds mastered by Steve Hoffman, lacquers cut by Kevin Gray from "the original master tapes". But was the original tape actually used? So they say. And if so, what happened to that tape because the original tape has been lost and gone since then.

The D.C.C. edition was released and I reviewed it in the print version of The Tracking Angle. A short time later I got a call from Warner Brothers publicist Bob Merlis who said there's someone on the line who wants to talk to you. It was Brian thanking me for the review and remembering when back in the early 1980s I fixed his turntable!

It was around that time that I compared the various versions I had, and discovered that in addition to the brown colored jacket edition, tucked into So Tough was that same record, but pressed years earlier! I'd been so dismissive of Carl and the Passions, I'd never bothered to look closely enough to see Pet Sounds! And these two versions sounded arguably better than the DCC edition. At around the same time prices on So Tough began to rise, either because of what I wrote, or just because. And comparing the D.C.C. edition with this new one, no contest!

But what was the source of that Artisan cut? No one knew.

Now We Know!

Definitive Sound Series' Tom Biery is quite certain that he found that tape while searching in the archive files where he found a reference to "Reprise Master". He got ahold of that tape and it does say "use for copies only, see MASTER for lacquers" but was that master an original Capitol master that's long been lost? Or is it this tape? No matter. This tape matches perfectly with the 1972 and 1976 releases and it's not been touched for decades and sounds spectacular! I have a test pressing and I promise you it's the best sounding version of Pet Sounds you will ever hear (I compared to original pressing, U.K. original Duophonic, DCC Compact Classics edition, Analogue Productions reissue).

Limited to 6000 copies worldwide

NOTE: The Vinylphyle series edition is not sourced from this Reprise tape. Instead it uses the 'best available source' tape previously used by Analogue Productions, and possibly others.

DSS One-Step Details

·      Audio Source: EQ’d Original Mono Analog Tapes

·      Vinyl Compound: Neotech VR900-D2 180g High-Definition Vinyl

·      Vinyl Mastering: Chris Bellman at Bernie Grundman Mastering

·      One-Step Process: Dorin Sauerbier at Record technology, Inc.

·      Pressing: Record Technology, Inc.

·      Print & Packaging: gpa Global

The press release:

Artist: The Beach Boys

Title: Pet Sounds (monophonic)   DSS One Step

Format: 1xLP, 180g Definitive Sound Series One Step – ALL ANALOG

Release Date: May 15, 2026

Label: Capitol Records

UPC: 199957574280

Catalog Number: DSS 6

Original Release Date:  May 16, 1966

SRLP: $99.98

The Definitive Sound Series (DSS) meticulous One-Step process creates the definitive sounding audiophile version of all-time classic albums.

By 1972 The Beach Boys had their own label, Brother Records, which allowed them to master the first reissue of “Pet Sounds” at the legendary mastering facility, Artisan. The Beach Boys “Pet Sounds”

DSS One Step was mastered from those circa 1972 original analog tapes, in monophonic sound! For over 50 years it appears that these tapes had very seldom been listened to let alone used in a final reissue production.

This DSS One Step presentation allows the listener to hear this historical recording masterpiece in 3D mono sound for the first time. The ambitious production, arrangements and emotional lyrics all sound more balanced and natural.

This DSS One Step version is limited to a one-time pressing of 6,000 numbered copies, includes a top-quality heavyweight tip on single pocket, gatefold jacket with a certificate of authenticity and is housed inside a uniquely designed slipcase.

Special care has been taken to faithfully preserve the original sound with exceptional clarity and depth, capturing the recordings nuances at every step, in order to create the definitive sounding record.

The One-Step process is highly regarded among audiophiles and collectors for its unparalleled sound fidelity and represents the pinnacle of vinyl manufacturing and the listening experience.

There will also be a Vinyphyle release not sourced from this tape.

Here's another press release:

The Beach Boys’ Pet Sounds Celebrates 60 Years with  Interscope-Capitol’s Definitive Sound Series One Step Edition,

Out May 15

 

Release Inspired by the Legendary 1972 Brother Records Pressing, Sourced from Rare Analog Tapes Discovered in the Archive

 

Capitol/UMe To Release Vinylphyle and Zoetrope Vinyl Editions

 

Los Angeles, CA – March 24, 2026 – Sixty years after its release, The Beach Boys’ Pet Sounds still ranks among the most revered and influential albums in music history. Cited among the greatest albums ever made, the 1966 masterpiece crafted by Brian Wilson pushed the boundaries of pop music.

To mark the album’s 60th anniversary, Interscope-Capitol’s Definitive Sound Series (DSS) will release a limited-edition pressing of 6,000 numbered copies presenting the album in the original monophonic mix Brian Wilson originally crafted in the studio. The All Analog recording pressed on Neotech VR900 DS 180-gram high-definition vinyl at Record Technology, Inc., using the state-of-the-art One Step process, which eliminates multiple steps in the plating process and delivers the album’s intricate arrangements and vocal harmonies with remarkable clarity. The DSS edition includes a certificate of authenticity detailing the mastering, plating, and pressing chain. The album’s now available for pre-order.

 Mastered by Chris Bellman at Bernie Grundman Mastering from rarely used circa-1972 original analog tapes, the new audiophile edition was inspired by the circa-1972 Brother Records’ pressing, first issued as a two-fer with Carl and the Passions – “So Tough” and later released as a standalone LP. Long celebrated among collectors for its striking sonic clarity, the pressing became the blueprint for the Definitive Sound Series edition. With nearly 400 different variants circulating worldwide, debate over the best-sounding version of Pet Sounds has become legendary among collectors and audiophiles.

 While researching archival materials, the DSS team and producer Tom “grover” Biery discovered analog tapes labeled “Reprise Master”—Reprise having distributed the Beach Boys’ Brother Records releases. Further analysis by mastering engineer Chris Bellman confirmed that the tapes matched the revered early-70s pressing, with identical running times and catalog references, indicating they were the source for the circa-1972 Artisan-cut lacquers.

 “For years I thought the versions I had were great, until I heard that early ‘70s Brother Records pressing,” says Biery. “It felt like hearing Pet Sounds in three-dimensional mono sound for the first time. The balance, the arrangements, the emotional depth—everything came alive. Finding these tapes is like discovering a missing chapter of history.”

 In addition to the Interscope-Capitol Definitive Sound Series edition, Capitol/UMe will release a premium all-analog audiophile 2LP Vinylphyle Edition featuring the original album in both mono and stereo, as well as a collectibleZoetrope vinyl edition. They will also release The Pet Sounds Sessions Highlights in multiple formats, which culls 25 alternate takes, a cappellas, and tracking sessions from the 1997 Grammy-nominated box set The Pet Sounds Sessions. For more information or to pre-order the Pet Sounds 60th anniversary releases, visit: https://beachboys.lnk.to/PetSounds60PR.

 Iconic Artists Group oversees The Beach Boys’ legacy in partnership with the members of the band and their estates.

Comments

  • 2026-03-24 09:36:24 AM

    MrRom92 wrote:

    Begs the question - what will Vinylphile be using and why can’t two different arms of UMe agree on what is the best tape to use?

    I will likely stick with the DCC, enough stories have been told about which tapes were the source back in the 90’s and whatever the case it is a shame that they no longer seem to be available, as I don’t doubt that better cutting and pressing could be done today if those original tapes reappeared. Or at least the DCC tape copies. It is a travesty that ANY of those were not kept track of carefully. My peanut brain simply will not be able to get over the issue of sourcing when it comes to this album.

    • 2026-03-24 11:29:56 AM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I hope one day you get to compare this new issue with the DCC....

  • 2026-03-24 11:28:34 AM

    Gary Saluti wrote:

    Yet another!? Enough already.

    • 2026-03-24 11:29:19 AM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      a younger generation needs this even if you do not

      • 2026-03-24 06:20:26 PM

        Come on wrote:

        …remains the question which younger generation still listens to the Beach Boys ;-)

        It seems to me the whole reissue industry (with some release exceptions) is aimed towards the 50-80 year olds, but I may be wrong.

        • 2026-03-30 11:17:40 PM

          Malachi Lui wrote:

          plenty of gen z kids listen to the beach boys. among rateyourmusic users, pet sounds is still ranked the 27th greatest album of all time (many boomer classics have been lowered in stature there in recent years, but pet sounds rightfully hasn't). and we're the generation that acknowledges that love you and surf's up are great albums. so no, the beach boys legacy isn't fading anytime soon, though of course we all ignore the 80s-onward stuff led by scumbag mike love.

    • 2026-03-24 08:32:08 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      i fully understand the fatigue of the same boomer albums being reissued over and over again. in many cases, those endless reissues are minimal differences or upgrades. i agree it's exhausting. but this DSS one-step of pet sounds is by far the best it's ever sounded, and it's also one of the greatest and most important albums of all time. there are new pressings of pet sounds every year, but most of those are for general/casual markets and are cuts of varying quality from digital transfers of the lesser capitol copy tape. the reprise tape used for the DSS one-step is better. the new DSS also sounds much more three-dimensional than the analogue productions mono from the capitol tape, which is now out of print and also has really inflated bass.

      • 2026-03-25 02:44:12 PM

        Come on wrote:

        I'd be interested in your take on how much of an exception you are within the "younger generations" in terms of sound quality affine.

        In the same way oldtimer prices are going down due to the lacking interest of anyone younger than boomers in them, I assume labels produce reissues for boomers mainly, because they may be the last generation interested in sound quality the way we are here at this place. Surely the younger generations are interested in vinyl now, but in my perception this is focused on the tactile experience, fancy colored pressings..but not necessarily the Grundman or 1step cut.

        I guess a more expensive 1step or a Grundman cut of a Gen X-Z favorite group wouldn't sell at all, because neither them, nor the boomers would buy it.

        • 2026-03-29 05:29:30 PM

          Malachi Lui wrote:

          as a gen Z person, i can say that my generation is basically priced out of this stuff, but millennials and gen X making better money have gotten into vinyl over the past few years (especially during covid) and they seem willing to spend on high quality product. VMP did really well with catering audiophile grade reissues to millennial and gen X buyers before they combusted in an unfortunate series of bad internal decisions. and now with because sound matters and the definitive sound series, we've gotten one-steps of green day, linkin park, a perfect circle, and blink-182, since the target audience for that music has now hit 40.

          it's true that younger buyers are more swayed by aesthetics, but go through any discogs page for a recent release big pop album and you'll see comments about the actual pressing quality. they might not be the most informed comments, they're not exactly from perfectly trained ears on high-end setups, but younger buyers know crap quality from good quality, even if they might not currently understand the process that leads to those different results.

          • 2026-03-29 08:31:51 PM

            Come on wrote:

            Thx much, really appreciated! It will be interesting if there’s still a second hand market, halfway paying the prices of past‘s hq and rare releases, as soon as boomers will have other priorities and are still able to sell them and to benefit from the revenue.

      • 2026-03-26 01:18:12 PM

        A.N. Other wrote:

        MF gave the $40 AP mono version an 11 for sound when he reviewed it for Analog Planet in 2015, concluding (after comparing it with the usual suspects including DCC and the 1972 So Tough version) that "if you're going to have but one version this one from Analogue Productions is the one to have." I appreciate that this is all subjective and that assigning a numerical score is really just shorthand, but do you really mean to say that the DSS is "by far the best" and "much more three-dimensional"? I'm sure it's good, but given how good the AP mono is, that sounds a bit hyperbolic; I share your enthusiasm for the album, but surely at this point we're in the world of diminishing returns. Also, unless you were referring to a different AP mono version, I don't think it's out of print: https://store.acousticsounds.com/d/95587/The_Beach_Boys-Pet_Sounds-180_Gram_Vinyl_Record

        • 2026-03-26 07:17:48 PM

          Spin The Black Circle wrote:

          Very well said! Exactly what I was thinking.

          • 2026-03-27 12:14:19 PM

            Michael Fremer wrote:

            I made a mistake there, swayed by the bottom end power that's not on any other release, original or reissue...I own up to my young and foolish mistakes.

      • 2026-03-27 05:28:21 PM

        13th Duke of Wymbourne wrote:

        I like the phrase 'boomer albums' but I wonder what is the corollary phrase for someone not a Boomer writing about it for Boomers? Yoofsplainin' ?

  • 2026-03-24 12:10:11 PM

    Thomas Ream wrote:

    I have a Beatles question to ask.....I don't know how else to, I believe that someone at Tracking Angle might know the answer, and since Pet Sounds was a response to Rubber Soul - here goes. We have had elaborate sets of Abbey Road, Let it Be, the White Album, Sgt Pepper, The US Beatle releases, etc, but nothing of Rubber Soul. I have always felt that Rubber Soul marked the change in the Beatles music from pop to something different, and thus deserves a deep look....and I have also felt a strong preference for the tracks on the US version, which kicked off with "I've Just Seen a Face"...I was disappointed when that was seen to be not really a part of Rubber Soul. On the other hand, my purple label US version is what I would call "dual" mono......not really stereo at all. Anyway, now that we have Anthology 4, are there other Beatle projects in the works?

    • 2026-03-24 01:45:58 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I don't know what's in the works but I wish the original stereo mixes (problematic as they are sometimes, would get the AAA treatment like the mono mixes got...

      • 2026-03-26 12:25:27 PM

        Steve Edwards wrote:

        Concur Michael. I have the AP stereo version from 2016. IMHO, it sounds pretty good; would be curious to compare it with a DSS stereo version.

        • 2026-03-27 12:12:42 PM

          Michael Fremer wrote:

          The DSS will be mono only

  • 2026-03-24 01:21:01 PM

    Mark Harding wrote:

    Fantastic. The DSS series has been very impressive sounding so far. Ordered.

  • 2026-03-24 01:35:23 PM

    Jeffrey C. Robbins wrote:

    Michael, you say you have compared the new DSS test pressing against a variety of older sources — but unless I missed it, you don’t mention comparing it against the So Tough vintage version. As that is the one I already have, I’m interested in whether the new DSS is an upgrade or sounds essentially the same as the 1972 release. Thanks. JCR

    • 2026-03-24 01:48:08 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      The "So Tough" uses the same metal parts as the brown "stand alone" version but I did compare to the "stand alone" version and this is better. When I review the finished product I'll cover them all!

  • 2026-03-24 02:55:58 PM

    Ben wrote:

    Hi Micheal, thanks for the stellar write up. The 1972 LP is known for having a 2:1 compression ratio and use of a high pass filter. Do you know if this tape found is with these additions or just the EQ before these were applied? Just curious if it’ll be the same as the 1972 just a new cutting or the same source tape this time without limiting or filtering. Thanks!

    • 2026-03-27 12:16:43 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      how does anyone know the compression ratio? No doubt the tape has some compression applied but high pass filter? I compared the 1972 LP to the 30th anniversary box set's CD overseen by Brian and mastered by Joe Gastwirt and the bottom ends were very similar...

  • 2026-03-24 03:22:56 PM

    Will wrote:

    aaaarrrggghhhh :)

    Information from the Vinylphyle site: SOURCE: AAA. MONO: 1966 assembled master reel - Joe Nino-Hernes. ADA. STEREO: 1996 assembled master reel -- 2025 sequenced 1/2" 30IPS copy - Joe Nino-Hernes

    • 2026-03-24 06:54:06 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      this is what's interesting. the vinylphyle mono uses whatever the 'best available source' in the capitol vault is, which is clearly inferior to the reprise tape recently found and used for the DSS one-step (i've heard the one-step, it's truly amazing and the last copy of pet sounds you'll ever need). yet the vinylphyle stereo is that new 1/2" 30ips analog copy... meanwhile the analogue productions stereo 45 was cut from a 1/4" 15ips dolby SR master. not sure the rationale for running off a new copy of the 90s stereo remix.

      • 2026-03-24 10:28:25 PM

        MrRom92 wrote:

        I am not sure either, if I had to guess - maybe Sterling currently lacks the capability to cut directly from an SR encoded tape, and so a decoded flat copy needed to be made. One would presume the stereo versions cut directly from the 1/4” 15IPS mixdown tapes would be better. I would be more inclined to find one of the Analogue Productions pressings if it were the stereo mix I wanted.

        That they describe their mono tape as the “1966 assembled master” would indicate to me that it is the compiled original mixes and if that is the case, would be preferable to me for use in a reissue over a 1970’s Dolby A 1/4” copy of the same. I would like to see photos of the mono tape box used for the vinylphile.

        • 2026-03-27 12:19:24 PM

          Michael Fremer wrote:

          Me too! It would be the first use of those original tapes ever since the missing 1966 master must have been an assembly of those, then copied, then these were disassembled and returned to the Capitol vault. That sounds highly suspicious. Once assembled, why disassemble?

  • 2026-03-24 06:09:35 PM

    Will wrote:

    and while Carl and the Passions is a bit inconsistent it, IMO, has some absolutely wonderful sounding tracks. Rather gutted that it, along with Friends and Wild Honey didn’t make it onto the AP release list. Maybe some were too hip to notice at the time, and I was lucky discovering them when I was 13 or 14.

  • 2026-03-24 10:45:20 PM

    Michael Zlotnicki wrote:

    Okay Michael, I have learned to trust you over the last 15 years or so, so you’re speaking of the test pressing as you have knocked me off the fence. Ordered !

  • 2026-03-25 01:39:53 AM

    Tony G wrote:

    Michael, I believe you choose the AP MONO when released definitively over the two-fer back in the analog planet days.

    • 2026-03-25 07:51:16 AM

      Tony G wrote:

      Maybe definitively overstates but you did prefer the AP MONO.

      • 2026-03-27 12:08:50 PM

        Michael Fremer wrote:

        I was snookered by the bass.... I was so young and impressionable lol....

  • 2026-03-25 06:59:27 AM

    Rashers wrote:

    This is annoying. As soon as I saw the One Step, I ordered it (European tax and shipping increases the price to $150 - but, whatever....), then I saw the Vinylphyle version. Hmmm - these have been great products so far - and the website states "Pressed at RTI on 180g black vinyl and cut from original mono and stereo analog tapes by Joe Nino-Hernes at Sterling Sound." So, I'm totally confused - if the original mono and stereo tapes are lost - why are they making this statement? It is also followed by the comment "this newly remastered, limited edition.." - it can't be Original Master Tape and be "Remastered" because the tape is the master - it can only be "cut." This version requires another $100 investment (VAT and shipping to Europe - not being shipped from the UME warehouses in the EU - which is egregious, given that the "lesser" weird color version will ship from there). Any thoughts?

    • 2026-03-25 07:24:21 AM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I am very skeptical about the “master tape” claim. Joe Gastwirt, who mastered the 30th anniversary box set commented under the TrackingAngle Facebook post that the Pet Sounds mono master tape has long been missing or stolen and he too is skeptical. The stereo tape created in 2016 isn’t lost. If what was called “the original master tape” was assembled using copies of each song’s tape and Joe Nino-Hernes has gotten each of those tapes and assembled a new master tape that would be something but I’m skeptical of that scenario

      • 2026-03-25 09:02:47 AM

        Tony G wrote:

        Did you have a chance to revisit your original review of the AP mono vs DCC and the twofer? Since Chris ran the tape direct, very subtle nuances should only be expected. Your view of the bass on Chad’s mastering seemed very enthusiastic.

        • 2026-03-27 12:21:19 PM

          Michael Fremer wrote:

          I did that and will describe what I heard when i review the final DSS edition.

      • 2026-03-26 07:59:31 AM

        Rashers wrote:

        The other question that bothered me was the numbers: 6000 One Steps - about the number one would expect, but only 3000 (initial pressing) Vinylphyle. If the latter are from the purported sources then there won't be a lot of wear and tear on those stampers with that quantity. I'm torn so I poneyed up for both versions. They certainly won't lose value.

  • 2026-03-25 08:07:48 AM

    Tom wrote:

    When So Tough was first released, a 7.5 ips tape was issued which was quickly changed to a 3.75 IPS. IMO, the 7.5 ips mono tape is probably the best that this album will sound but the one step is intriguing me.

    • 2026-03-27 12:23:54 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I'd love to hear that 7.5IPS tape played back on my refurbished Revox G36!

  • 2026-03-25 12:19:52 PM

    Matt Shirley wrote:

    Michael, Malachi et al,

    I have a pristine White Label Promo of Carl and The Passions twofer with Pet Sounds sounding incredible. Does this one-step likely sound better than that pressing?

    Moreover have you or anyone in your orbit asked Joe Nino-Hernes for an image of the tape he used?

    Also confused by the 2025 stereo mix. Is this a new remaster from the digital threads printed to tape, much as the AP version?

    • 2026-03-27 12:25:11 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I'd love visual documentation of Joe's claims. I'm also confused by the 2025 stereo mix description. Something here doesn't add up!

  • 2026-03-25 12:32:18 PM

    Michael Zlotnicki wrote:

    Michael, that CD you held up in the Westerman round table…was that the mono CD in the ‘96 Sessions box set ?

    • 2026-03-27 12:07:15 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      was mono CD in the 30th anniversary "Making of Pet Sounds" box set

  • 2026-03-26 03:57:42 AM

    Anders Sørensen Uth wrote:

    Last year I came across the dreaded Duophonic release. As US originals of Pet Sounds are sought after I had to have it. To my surprise it doesn’t sound awful. It actually sounds great. Off course the aestetics of duophony is questionable, but I repeat myself: It sounds great. Deep bass, good clarity, freshnes. I prefer it over the AP mono which I also have. Just my take on it.

    • 2026-03-26 05:28:13 PM

      Will wrote:

      A few years ago I picked up a mint US Duophonic Smiley Smile, but didn't get round to playing 'til a few weeks ago - and when I did, I was pleasantly surprised, I thought it sounded rather good. Maybe one day I'll do a shoot out vs US & UK mono's and the AP's. Unlike many I prefer it to Pet Sounds. Maybe it was buying my first copy when I was 13 and before I had heard PS.

      • 2026-03-27 12:26:21 PM

        Michael Fremer wrote:

        I have the U.K. original Smiley Smile and haven't played it in probably 40 years (!).....I'll give it a spin.

  • 2026-03-28 08:46:11 AM

    Matt Gregory wrote:

    Great overview Michael. I ordered the one step and the Vinyphile too along with Session highlights. Looking forward to to playing all of it. And I have 50th anniversary copies too!

  • 2026-03-28 03:05:45 PM

    Ivan Bacon wrote:

    DSS vs Vinylphyle 2LP ??

    The link at the end of the article is not working

    NOW DSS vs Vinylphyle 2LP - everything appears to be the same so what is, or what does, "one step" mean and why should i pay more for it as apposed to the Vinylphyle 2LP. ?? I have vague understanding of One Step process but i would like to know exactly what it is and how it works. MF? I have wanted this LP for a long time, hoping for just such a quality AAA release. (i don't do digital)

    • 2026-03-28 03:23:54 PM

      Ivan Bacon wrote:

      Hindsight question, is the quality difference worth the 45.00 difference??

      • 2026-03-29 05:23:43 PM

        Malachi Lui wrote:

        yes, it's worth the $45 difference and the fact that the one-step only gives you the mono mix. the DSS one-step is from a better tape AND it's pressed on the neotech VR900-D2 formulation with the one-step process

        basically the one-step process is the closest a pressed record can be to the starting lacquer. normal three-step process is lacquer—>father—>mother—>stamper—>vinyl. in other words, positive—>negative—>positive—>negative—>positive. the one-step process is lacquer—>convert (negative)—>vinyl. which is also why you can only get one 'stamper' off of each lacquer for a one-step. hence why they're so expensive, because of all the extra labor for cutting multiple lacquers (though the electroforming process is easier than the usual three-step plating). and the VR900-D2 vinyl is a superior, quieter formulation, even compared to the already very good neotech VR100 that's standard at RTI.

        hope that answers your questions. we haven't heard the vinylphyle pet sounds yet but the one-step is undoubtedly the best it'll ever be. and that's not mere hyperbole.

        • 2026-04-02 01:39:17 PM

          Ivan Bacon wrote:

          Thank you for taking the time to answer my questions.

  • 2026-03-29 08:30:27 AM

    Jake wrote:

    Will this version be released on SACD? (If not, can you kindly ask them to?)

    • 2026-03-29 01:44:59 PM

      Ivan Bacon wrote:

      Jake, acoustic sounds does have their older release on SACD, catalog (product #) CAPP 067 SA

    • 2026-03-29 05:17:12 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      grover says he's working on having an SACD series alongside the one-step vinyl series

  • 2026-03-30 06:37:37 PM

    Georges wrote:

    I like the cover! Will there be a download for sale?

    • 2026-03-30 11:07:29 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      none of the DSS/BSM one-steps are gonna get equivalent downloads (though some of the BSM titles sourced from digital have had previous hi-res downloads that are pretty close to what the one-step LPs are). but as mentioned above, grover has been working towards launching an SACD series tied in with the one-step vinyl.

      i'm not sure what the absolute best digital copy of pet sounds is, but the 2014 SHM-SACD is a flat transfer of the mono capitol copy tape (the master they've been using for the last 30 years until the reprise tape was rediscovered for this one-step), and that sounds decent considering the inferior source. and you can dump it into a workstation and master it to your liking.

      • 2026-04-01 05:41:54 PM

        Georges wrote:

        Thank you for the quick and precise reply, as always. I find it unfortunate, but we'll have to accept it. Alas.