Acoustic Sounds

Louis Armstrong

Louis in London

Music

Sound

Label: Verve

Produced By: Ricky Riccardi and Ken Druker

Engineered By: BBC TV

Mastered By: Kevin Reeves

Lacquers Cut By: Kevin Reeves

By: Michael Fremer

July 17th, 2024

Genre:

Jazz

Format:

Vinyl

A Career Closing Louis Armstrong Recording Resurfaces With a Feel Good Story

BBC TV show July 2, 1968 first aired Sept. 22, 1968

In need of a feel good story? Here it is. There's even a hi-fi system tie in. The story as told in the booklet by Ricky Riccardi, Director of Research Collections for the Louis Armstrong House Museum (and author of three Armstrong biographies) begins almost a year after this BBC performance with Louis at home recuperating from two hospital stays playing for guests his new Tandberg reel to reel tape recorders his wife Lucille had installed as a surprise while he was away.

That alone is a feel good story for any audiophile who's snuck gear into the house, but it gets better. However, you'll have to get the record to read it all. Sadly, Louis was gone two years later, preferring to die on stage if necessary to keep playing. He didn't quite go that way but it was close. Following a two shows a night March 1971 Waldorf Astoria appearance during which he needed between show oxygen, Armstrong suffered a heart attack.

The mailed promo presentation

Much of this material had been released on a Brunswick LP Louis Armstrong's Greatest Hits Recorded Live (for which he received a producing credit) that he promoted on television before the Waldorf appearance, so here it is again with a few additions, including a wonderful "Blueberry Hill."

Look, this is late crowd pleasing, entertainer Louis that includes "Hello Dolly" and "Mame", "Mack the Knife", "When the Saints Go Marching In" and of course "What a Wonderful World", which was a big hit at the time and the studio crowd eats it up and enjoys listening as much as Louis and the All-Star band (Tyree Glenn, Joe Myranyi, Marty Napoleon, Buddy Catlett and Danny Barcelona) enjoys playing it for them. His voice sounds great and he's having a great time performing entertainment and riding new career popularity heights just around the time Miles was doing Miles In the Sky.

You could say this is hopelessly corny stuff, but it was a time of great stress in the world and Louis' antidote worked then and his joyful performance works now, though "What a Wonderful World" is a stretch!

Kevin Reeves, whose recent lacquer cuts for the "Verve By Request" were universally reviled did the transferring, mixing and mastering at East Iris Studios in Nashville. The grooves here looked more "lively" than those earlier Verves and hallelujah! This is a good cut that sounds as vibrant and lively as the Qobuz stream.

The booklet accompanying the record duplicated the box pictured above so you get a facsimile of Louis' masking tape writing and Ricky Riccardi's entertaining notes. Play, place at the end of your Armstrong record collection and even if you don't play it again (but you probably will) call it a pleasing end cap to a remarkable recorded career. What a wonderful man!

Music Specifications

Catalog No: 602465543698

Pressing Plant: GZ affiliate, perhaps NRP?

SPARS Code: ADA

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 140 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Mono

Presentation: Single LP

Comments

  • 2024-07-18 12:57:15 PM

    PeterG wrote:

    I love "What a Wonderful World", and I sing it to myself regularly. But it does sadden me just a bit that Louis's later music is his more well known legacy. He invented modern jazz, or at least the modern jazz solo; and he was a champion of civil rights. A truly great artist/man

  • 2024-07-18 02:16:40 PM

    Chris O'Shea wrote:

    Great one Michael..Back in the Fall 1974 as a college freshman my meager first "good" stereo was set up in my dorm room... as the posse filtered into my room for our nightly ritual of passing the "Peace Pipe" I was playing some Armstrong Hot 5/7 tracks..... One of the guys asked "What's that on the box?" Louis Armstrong, I answered... " His message was so strong Hitler banned his music"....We need all the joy we can experience these days..... More Pops, less Lee Greenwood....

  • 2024-07-19 10:51:42 AM

    Rich wrote:

    Guess it's nice that this is being released in its entirety. But it raises a question which is usually ignored on this website: coverage of releases of marginal interest in the context of an artist's discography just because newly issued on vinyl vs. older releases of considerably greater artistic and/or "audio" merit (given this website's focus on vinyl and sound quality). There's obviously many live recordings of Louis Armstrong in his small group "All Star" context of much greater historical and artistic quality going back to the 1947 Satchmo at Symphony Hall album (whose best modern day releases have been in digital format). I'm really hoping to see a Tracking Angle review (Fred Kaplan?) of the upcoming Centennial LP box release of the King Oliver's Creole Jazz Band featuring the very first recordings of Armstrong that's coming out August 30 on Archeophone label. It is no exaggeration to call these some of the most important recordings in American Popular Music history and considerable effort has been made over the years to yield the best sounding versions of these sessions. Yeah, it's difficult to rationalize listening to admittedly challenging recordings of King Oliver or Charley Patton on expensive audio systems. But aside from the historical aspects this is simply thrilling music -- forget "11", if Louis in London merits an "8" for Music I'd say King Oliver's Creole Jazz Band is at least a "20" -- that IMO should not be ignored. Could someone who claims to be a movie connoisseur justify not watching Citizen Kane or Casablanca because they are in B&W...?

    • 2024-07-19 03:37:57 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      B&W is a great format! I watched a Gene Wilder bio on Netflix last night (highly recommended) and when Gene and Mel Brooks said they wanted to shoot "Young Frankenstein" in B&W because it was a tribute to Whale, the director of the original "Frankenstein", Columbia pictures balked and dropped the deal! They took it to 20th Century Fox and got it made. How crazy!

      • 2024-07-19 07:12:50 PM

        Willie Luncheonette wrote:

        Michael, you might be surprised how many people, both young and old, but mostly young. will not watch a single B&W movie because "It's too boring." One of my favorite quotes is by the great American film director Sam Fuller. "Life is in color. But black and white is more realistic." BINGO

        • 2024-07-20 12:04:54 AM

          Malachi Lui wrote:

          it's actually really interesting how black and white, subtitles, or even 35mm turns some people off of watching stuff. to the point that just about anything made before 2K digital cameras is something 'esoteric' that they've 'never heard of' and they ask me how i know of these 'obscure' films.

          every process for anything has reason and intentionality often beyond technical or financial practicality. 16mm vs 35mm vs 70mm, analog 2-track vs 8-track multi vs SMPTE-synched 48-track, mono vs stereo vs atmos... it's all the same debate that really should result in the same conclusion of 'well... what works best for this?'

          • 2024-07-20 02:28:42 AM

            Willie Luncheonette wrote:

            Growing up in New York City and spending countless hours of my youth in movie theaters, I have to remind myself there is now a large percentage of Americans who have never known the joy of watching wonderful films made between 1915 and1980 in glorious 35mm on a wide screen in a dark theater. I mean, if you live in a city without a revival house or a museum that shows films, how are you going to have the ultimate experience viewing the art of classic cinema?

      • 2024-07-20 05:27:03 AM

        Rich wrote:

        In retrospect my comparison of a film originally presented in B&W to an "acoustic era" 78 RPM sourced recording was inappropriate -- kinda apples-to-oranges. But out of curiosity, how many Tracking Angle music reviews have covered 78 sourced recordings? Offhand I can only think of Miles & Co. "The Birth of Cool" collection(?) and possibly a Charlie Parker Savoy/Dial recordings review(?) And have there been any TA reviews of recordings that pre-dated Western Electric/RCA Orthophonic electrical 78 recordings which I think started circa 1925 or so?

        • 2024-07-20 05:33:34 AM

          Rich wrote:

          Shame on me -- Willie Luncheonette's fine survey of Monk recordings included the early Blue Notes as well as some Minton's era material. My bad...

    • 2024-07-19 06:44:49 PM

      Michael Weintraub wrote:

      A label called Off the Record did a pretty remarkable job with these recordings on this CD from 2006: https://www.discogs.com/release/4341309-King-Oliver-Off-The-Record-The-Complete-1923-Jazz-Band-Recordings Obviously, one needs to adjust one's expectations given the time period when this music was recorded, but the music sounds fresh and lively and very engaging. For some of these very old recordings, digital is probably the best we'll ever get. As you said, these recordings are a crucial part of America's musical heritage, but they're quite a lot of fun to listen to as well!

      • 2024-07-20 05:53:43 AM

        Rich wrote:

        Agree, the Off the Record (which was distributed by and may be an imprint of Archeophone Records) release is likely the current digital gold standard. And I'm guessing the upcoming release will probably be mastered from those digital files(?) The best pre-digital vinyl version I've heard was the 1974 Herwin release: https://www.discogs.com/master/584660-King-Oliver-The-Great-1923-Gennetts. After posting these anal retentive, overly long comments I'm probably obligated to dig out my copy and do my own shoot out with the upcoming LP/CD box. Cheers!