Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

Art Blakey & The Jazz Messengers

Free For All

Music

Sound

Free For All Art Blakey & the Jazz Messengers

Label: Blue Note / UMe

Produced By: Alfred Lion

Engineered By: Rudy Van Gelder

Mastered By: Kevin Gray

Lacquers Cut By: Kevin Gray

By: Malachi Lui

March 2nd, 2026

Format:

Vinyl

Art Blakey & The Jazz Messengers' ‘Free For All’ Gets Blue Note Classic Reissue

How does it compare to the Music Matters SRX?

The core lineup of Art Blakey’s Jazz Messengers changed regularly, but 1964 brought more drastic changes than usual. On trumpet, Freddie Hubbard had joined the Messengers on 1962’s Mosaic; he stayed until March 1964, when Lee Morgan returned. In September, tenor sax player and musical director Wayne Shorter left to join what became Miles Davis’ Second Great Quintet. Pianist Cedar Walton and bassist Reggie Workman followed in their departures, and trombonist Curtis Fuller also left shortly after. Free For All, recorded in February 1964 but released in July 1965, was the penultimate Jazz Messengers session for Blue Note, and stands as the apex of these musicians’ chemistry.

Side one features two Wayne Shorter compositions, the title track and “Hammer Head.” The latter is a perfectly fine, fairly straightforward midtempo piece, good but nothing special. “Free For All,” however, is probably the greatest 11 minutes that Art Blakey and the Jazz Messengers ever recorded, across any lineup. Shorter takes the first and longest solo, which progressively intensifies as Freddie Hubbard and Curtis Fuller occasionally layer the refrain over him. Fuller’s solo is more restrained, but by the time Hubbard gets halfway through his, it’s fully cacophonous, followed by an especially thunderous Blakey solo and concluding with Shorter and Hubbard’s abrasive final wail.

On side two, Hubbard’s “The Core” doesn’t assert itself as much as the title track does, but still has those exhilarating moments of controlled chaos when all three horns play over each other—heading towards the same direction, taking slightly different paths to get there—as Blakey moves between rhythms to contrast against the front line. Reggie Workman and Cedar Walton are the anchors of these side openers, staying composed and consistent as the others explode around them. The album ends with “Pensativa,” a slower Clare Fischer piece arranged by Hubbard, which has some nice horn harmonization, though perhaps isn’t as delicate as it should be (of course, this session couldn’t have gone all the way in the opposite direction for one song).

Sonically, Free For All is a very good sounding Rudy Van Gelder recording, but not a perfect one—it’s often blatantly in the red (there’s noticeable drum distortion), and the piano and bass are mixed low, sometimes to the point of barely being audible. That said, the stereo spread is excellent (Blakey and Shorter on the right, Hubbard and fuller on the left, and Walton and Workman in the middle), with well-established space and textural delineation, and the piano tone when you hear it is pretty good.

In 2012, Music Matters released a 2LP 45rpm Free For All cut by Kevin Gray at Cohearent Audio and pressed at RTI, followed in 2019 by a 33rpm pressing with the same specs, except pressed on Neotech VR900 premium vinyl (marketed by Music Matters as “Silent Running eXperience,” or SRX). I haven’t heard the 45, but the SRX 33 is one of the best sounding records I have. It’s appropriately bold and doesn’t hold back, yet it’s incredibly detailed and immersive. The musicians are right there and it sounds almost like tape. (That’s partly because the original VR900 compound seems to have a softer character than RTI’s normal VR100 vinyl, and more overtly imparts that character than the VR900-D2 compound, which the Because Sound Matters and Definitive Sound Series one-steps use. They also look different: VR900 is a transparent gray, like a really dark pair of sunglasses, while VR900-D2 is a frosted translucent blue-ish gray.)

Now, as Blue Note’s all-analog mass-market Classic Vinyl Series continues to supplant the digitally sourced Blue Note 75 reissues, we get another Free For All cut from the original master tape once again by Kevin Gray at Cohearent, but pressed at Optimal. It’s a new cut, and I’m not sure what upgrades Gray has made since 2019 or if he changed any EQ here, but the BN Classic is smoother, more polite, and spatially drier. Blakey’s drums don’t have the same physicality and textural detail, and Walton’s piano and Workman’s bass are less robust, though horns have more grit without sounding hard. The SRX has better dimensionality and more air, whereas the Classic is a little more forward; in some ways, the Classic sounds as if it’s a generation removed from the SRX, despite the source being the same. Plating, pressing, and vinyl formulation can make a huge sonic difference, and this is a good example.

Despite my reservations, the Blue Note Classic reissue of Free For All still sounds excellent, and some people seem to prefer it over the SRX. For the $28 retail price, the Classic is a no-brainer if you don’t already have this essential recording. If you have the SRX Free For All, you might not be replacing it with this new BN Classic, but those who don’t have any modern all-analog pressing can get the Classic and be set for life. The Music Matters SRX isn’t reasonably obtainable now: it was limited to 1500 copies, which retailed for $60 back in 2019 ($75 now adjusted for inflation), and regularly resells for $200 or more. Those aftermarket prices are probably because no one wants to sell their SRX pressings, because they’re the absolute best these albums will ever be. But the BN Classic gets you 80-85% of the way there for 14% of the current SRX price, and you might even prefer the BN Classic horn sound.

The 180g Optimal pressing for this Blue Note Classic reissue arrived slightly dish-warped with some light surface scuffs, but plays very quiet as expected. Unfortunately, though, the text colors on the front cover aren’t accurate. It’s not a major difference, but the colors are lighter and occasionally just wrong: “FREE” is supposed to be purple, except it’s dark blue on the BN Classic. Not sure how that happened. No color or resolution issues with the Blakey photo, however.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: ST-84170 / 7522506 / 00602475225065

Pressing Plant: Optimal Media

SPARS Code: AAA

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 180 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: Analog Master Tape

Presentation: Single LP

Comments

  • 2026-03-02 06:00:39 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Interesting comparison and spot on music rating, not one of the stronger hard bop recordings imo.

    As far as I know, all the major mastering chain upgrades of KG were done when the MM33 started, so differences towards the BN Classic reissue must be somewhere among Joe Harley‘s possible EQ‘ing influence or pressing plant differences. I have the fantastic Griffin SRX, so I’m aware of the Neotech benefits, but I don’t think it’s responsible for all of the differences you heard. In my experience (with few exceptions, including the very first AP45s Blue Notes), the MM45 usually better the BN Classic and BN80s reissues, too, in most aspects (inspite of not having all the mastering chain upgrades). Nevertheless... nothing against BN Classic, they're good.

    • 2026-03-03 02:10:40 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I'm going to ask Joe about where the early MMs were cut.

      • 2026-03-03 05:29:32 PM

        Come on wrote:

        I understand you mean the early MM33 (not the early MM45 or the early AP45) and where they were cut (not pressed).

        I’m just not sure what’s unclear here. At least my understanding is:

        The AP45 were cut at Acoustech by KG, mastered by SH (if at all just little influenced by KG)

        The MM45 were cut at Acoustech by KG, mastered by KG/SH with Joe Harley influence (to different, more MM33-like LKG influenced standards later compared to earlier where mastering was more SH influenced)

        The MM33 (normal and SRX, early or later) were cut at Cohearent by KG, mastered by KG with Joe Harley influence

        All were pressed by RTI

        The BN Classic were cut at Cohearent by KG, mastered by KG and pressed at Optimal

        Would be interesting if you get a different status by Joe Harley.

        • 2026-03-05 06:29:48 AM

          Malachi Lui wrote:

          some of the later MM 45s were cut as cohearent. the runouts make that clear. but all of the AP 45s were mastered by KG and SH at acoustech, as well as some of the early MM 45s

          back in 2019 i reviewed the KG cohearent 33 BN 80/classic reissue of dexter gordon’s doin’ allright and compared it with the KG/SH acoustech MM 45. i vastly preferred the transparency of the cohearent BN 80, but you seem to regularly prefer the boosted, more rounded bass of the steve hoffman EQ at acoustech.

          • 2026-03-05 01:10:40 PM

            Come on wrote:

            You're right, I forgot, that about 1/3rd of the MM45 releases (changed somewhere in 2011) was already cut at Cohearent, so also this Blakey 45 RPM one. Even earlier than that, KG/SH mastering of those changed to solely KG.

            I understand your impression, as when I commented, I mostly commented the cases where I preferred the MM45 to BN Classic or BN80 releases, but in fact I just see it more differentiated. I prefer quite every MM33 to the MM45 and I also prefer several BN80 or BN Classic series 33 to the MM45 (Hancock/inventions & Dimensions, Parlan/Us three, Shorter/Adams Apple just as examples and several more). It's a case by case topic.

            I remember Michael compared one of the first AP45s with an MM33 and correctly stated how much better the latter sounds. Just as you made your Dexter Gordon Comparison, which was an early Cohearent MM45. It’s just wrong to transfer single results to the whole MM45 series, as a lot changed within this series. The first of them were mastered at Acoustech, the later at Cohearent. The later of the Cohearent already got part or all of the Mastering chain upgrades, the early ones not. EQ of the MM45 changed from mainly to lesser to not at all SH influenced anymore within the series and this also affected the transparency perception. You’ll hear this if you compare more of them and have lots of doubles.

            I do hear the boosted EQ of the early more SH influenced MM45s when it's present and it neither serves my genral taste, nor my setup's voicing, my setup just got much less critically sensible to the EQ topics, the more controlled bass got and the more resolution the top end had. I also hear the better transparency of the Cohearent releases after the complete mastering chain upgrade. The thing is just…all this differs among the MM45s. Partly even tape condition may have changed in certain cases, I don't know. When I prefer some MM45 over BN Classic or BN80 releases as in the examples above, it’s usually not because of the EQ differences but for a more palpable, airy and less dry sound. For others it’s the opposite and I prefer the BN Classic and BN80 for their better bass definition and transparency.

            It’s very similar when comparing old SH/KG Fantasy series releases with newer Cohearent releases of different series. It depends. It’s not as easy as if all Cohearent are better than the old ones, not at all, but various are.

          • 2026-03-06 08:25:24 AM

            Come on wrote:

            Finally, my suspect is, that at Acoustech, SH and KG either used a combination of solid state and tube gear or they varied their use depending on the recording. While at Cohearent (maybe also later at Acoustech), KG just uses the same solid state setup for all different qualities of recordings.

            This would explain why it depends, if an MM45 is preferable to a BN80 or Classic release or not and why, even when the latter is preferable and the revamped solid state mastering gear delivers better transparency, transients and better defined bass, there's partly still also an argument for the 45 in terms of a better tube-like palpability of instruments and solidity in tone. Although the newer releases often win in a majority of characteristics, for me it's definitely not just that simlpe reduction to a boosted EQ or not, it sounds as if there was more influence than that.

  • 2026-03-03 12:44:07 PM

    piero croce wrote:

    BN Classic is impossible to buy the records,the percentage of dished records is very high. Convex on a side and concave on the other side...is a cup?... Optimal at a very, very low level. 3 copies all failed. With The Eminent Jay Jay Johnson Volume 1 BN Classic even worse 5 unusable copies. instead the Tone Poets, 39 titles are all perfect. And use RTI as pressing plant...?

    • 2026-03-03 05:40:37 PM

      Come on wrote:

      Nowadays (all labels, reissue series and pressing plants) I have no idea how someone would play records without having access to a flattener. Nearly everything is dished more or less, sometimes to a cart-damaging degree, in any case to a degree that sounds inferior and stresses the cart. I would say something like 1-5% is flat, maybe 30% warped close to unplayable and the rest inbetween. It seems to be a matter of the vinyl boom and priority on output vs. proper cooling down and storage. On the other hand I think it’s hardly possible to manufacture a product like a record really flat. A flattener is a good investment for folks with large collections.

      • 2026-03-04 03:43:54 AM

        Come on wrote:

        Having had various perfectly flat Quality Pressings releases recently (not only UHQR) I'd say their percentage is different.

      • 2026-03-05 11:05:59 AM

        bwb wrote:

        my experience is very different. I don't buy near as many records as you do, but rarely (never?) do I find one that is anywhere near unplayable as is. The ones that are warped to the point I take out my flattener are a very small %. .

        I use an Acoustical Systems Reflex clamp which holds them tight to the platter so that takes care of slight warps. Maybe I'm just lucky, but I don't think I have ever returned a record for being warped, and rarely feel the need to flatten one.

        https://www.acoustical-systems.de/as-accessoires/helox-reflex-clamp-system/

        • 2026-03-07 05:16:57 AM

          Come on wrote:

          Nice, I also use the Reflex! I think we agree that clamping a warped or dished record mostly just helps (more or less) for one side. To be able to clamp everything, I additionally even have a screwable Brinkmann clamp and a flat puck for the spindle. But since I have a flattener I don’t use the clamps anymore for that purpose, just for resonance absorption. I flatten everything that’s not perfectly flat. Also because then I ensure a complete platter contact of the vinyl.

          I think I exaggerated a bit with „unplayable“, but what I mean is, that even many playable warps stress and on the long term harm the cantilever suspension and causes pitch variations (especially on piano records), which makes it „unplayable“ for me. I agree that the „really unplayable“ are very rare.

    • 2026-03-05 06:33:13 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      i have hundreds of optimal pressings over the past decade+ (i’d even estimate that maybe 20% of my collection was pressed at optimal) and within that i have many, many perfectly flat, quiet pressings. their defect rate has been very low for me. but every press run has a few duds. BN presses the classic series at optimal because it’s cheaper yet still very high quality (most of the time, at least). and i’ve also gotten duds from RTI.

  • 2026-03-06 10:08:05 PM

    AnalogJ wrote:

    But you know what? I own the SRX and the 45rpm of this album. The 45 is better still. It handles the explosiveness of this album in ways that the SRX only touches. It's got an ease with the dynamic swings that the SRX just doesn't have. Get a hold of the 45 if you want the best sounding, the most musical.

  • 2026-03-07 11:20:21 AM

    cashgrab wrote:

    Optimal has a problem. No two ways about it. I don't expect perfectly flat records but the warpage rate is way too high. And so are the warps.

    • 2026-03-07 11:54:13 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      again, i've only had a few optimal pressings with minor warps. most of the ones i have (which i buy, almost always new and sealed, no special promo records treatment) are excellent. i recently got the 18LP bowie 'brilliant adventure' box pressed at optimal and all of the 180g discs arrived flat, clean, and quiet. maybe i have better luck than you do, but i consider optimal to be one of the best pressing plants around - though i think sony japan, record industry, and RTI are a bit better (optimal equals pallas and QRP for me). every pressing plant has defects slip through, though. warpage can also be caused by packaging and shipping.

      the pressings i've had the most issues with lately are coming out of GZ's US facilities, memphis and nashville. noisy, hairline scuffs right out of the package, non-fill, and more likely to be slightly warped than most optimal pressings i get. and i've found the issue is specific to GZ's US plants, not GZ overall. i have better luck with GZ/precision canadian pressings, and even better luck with GZ czech pressings lately. memphis and nashville pressings are tolerable at best but extremely spotty, not sure what's going on there.

  • 2026-03-14 08:50:00 PM

    Tony Fafoglia wrote:

    I have the MM 33 on this and it's excellent bettering my old UA/Van Gelder copy considerably. Never got the hear the AP 45 and RE:Optimal pressings. In my old age I;ve generally come to view 45 LP's as a inconvenience and often not worth the gains in sound quality. I've purchased dozens of the 80th and BN Classics titles and only had 3 that had press defects and those were minor and didn't detract from the enjoyment of the music. In my experience the warpage thing has been minor. IMO RTI pressings while still of high quality are generally not as good as the pressing work they were doing in the 1990's and early 2000's.