Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

Art Pepper, rhythm section of Red Garland, Paul Chambers, Philly Joe Jones

Art Pepper Meets The Rhythm Section

Music

Sound

Art Pepper meets The Rhythm Section UHQR

Label: Analogue Productions/Stereo Records

Produced By: Lester Koenig

Engineered By: Roy DuNann

Mixed By: Roy DuNann

Mastered By: Bernie Grundman

Lacquers Cut By: Bernie Grundman

By: Michael Fremer

October 13th, 2025

Genre:

Jazz

Format:

Vinyl

Art Pepper Never Does Meet the Rhythm Section, Nonetheless This is A Classic Encounter

UHQR offers spectacular, if hard left/right sound

Of course Art Pepper, 31 when this album was recorded, doesn't really "meet" the rhythm section on the January 19th, 1957 recording, which puts the alto saxophonist hard left channel and the rhythm section hard right with little but open subtle ambient space between the two. Bernie Grundman explains in the booklet accompanying Contemporary Analogue Productions UHQR titles that the passive board didn't feature a center panning pot so it resembles early Beatles "stereo" albums, meant to be mixed down to mono giving the mixer greater control over the vocals versus the instrumentals.

The story behind the record is well known and probably most Tracking Angle readers are familiar but for those who aren't, to summarize some of what's related in Lester Koenig's album annotation (parts of which were disputed in "Straight Life", Pepper's autobiography): when Koenig found out Miles Davis's group was going to be in Los Angeles during a West Coast swing, he arranged, along with Pepper's wife Diane, to have the rhythm section—Red Garland, Paul Chambers and Philly Joe Jones— do a one day "east meets west" studio gig with Pepper who'd only been told about the gig that morning because Diane didn't want to unnerve him.

Miles had played late the evening before and the trio arrived late the next day at Contemporary's recording studio. Art's horn was in poor condition and he arrived with absolutely no idea what to play with this all-star group.

Pepper had never played most of the standards on the album. Nonetheless by the time it was over the group had laid down 9 tunes that included two collaborations: one between Pepper and Red Garland ("Red Pepper Blues"), the other ("Waltz Me Blues") between Pepper and Paul Chambers.

The album has electrified and fascinated jazz fans since it was first released in mono in 1957 mesmerized by Pepper's inventiveness, rising to the challenge and the rhythm section's high energy playing—perhaps feeling liberated from Miles's cool. It's a jazz collection essential, released in stereo a year later on Contemporary's Stereo label. The mono has sold for as much as $930.00 on Discogs. The stereo original's high price so far is $550.00

I have 3 versions: a '73 Contemporary Records stereo edition, an early Analogue Productions RTI reissue test pressing dated November 20th 1992 (33 years ago!) cut by Doug Sax at The Mastering Lab on the TML-M main lathe and a more recent Record Store Day Contemporary Records Acoustic Sounds Series Mono edition cut by Bernie Grundman and pressed at QRP.

The '73 stereo edition has a relaxed sonic sweetness, transparency and timbral "rightness" that makes the '92 TML cut sound somewhat grating and hard edged, though compared to nothing it sounds fine. The mono RSD day edition surprised because I figured it would solve the hard L/R issue and sound best, but instead it sounded undistinguished and not as well integrated as I'd expected. It greatly diminishes the music's power. I docked the sound one digit because of the artificial spread but otherwise it's an 11.

If you love this record and think you're done and don't need this UHQR I promise you are making a mistake! It's as close to a master tape as I've heard a record sound. Philly Joe's drum sound delivers effortless, explosive dynamics, cymbals that ring true and pure with macrodynamic shifts that add realism. Turn up the SPLs and you're in the room with the kit. Garland's piano and Chambers' bass are also there with unreserved authority and timbral and dynamic verisimilitude that demands you play at realistic SPLs if your system can do that. Backgrounds are jet black.

There's nothing subtle about how much better this UHQR sounds compared to the others I have and given how much better the Rollins Way Out West UHQR sounded compared to the original Stereo Records edition I have here, I'm confident that you'll be wowed by this limited to 2750 copies edition even if you have an original.

Interestingly, the cover art reproduction mirrors the sound. Here's the '73 repress:

The TML (can't hide it):

The mono:

The UHQR:

Am I correct? Or am I crazy? The records inside sound like the jackets look! The '73 is second to the UHQR....I know "conformation bias". Lol.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: UHQR 0022-45

Pressing Plant: QRP

Speed/RPM: 45

Weight: 200 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: original master tapes

Presentation: Multi LP

Comments

  • 2025-10-13 07:35:10 PM

    Come on wrote:

    In addition to those mentioned I also have the Craft Stereo release which probably gets closest to the UHQR. But for sure the UHQR will sound better as always.

    This time I didn’t pull the trigger yet because I don’t like Pepper’s east meets west playing half as much as I like Rollins’ west meets east, but let’s see what time will tell. Art Pepper+Eleven is by far my favorite of his albums, but I’m more an east coast guy anyway.

    • 2025-10-13 08:33:40 PM

      Bryan M. wrote:

      I bought both. Didn't "need" either as I have several different pressings of both. I am 100% happy I bought Way Out West on UHQR. The APMTRS unfortunately has lots of pops and ticks on Side 4 even after multiple cleanings. Only UHQR I've had a problem with so far (I have about 10 of them I think?) Too bad. If QRP let's UHQR quality slip, what else is slipping?

      • 2025-10-14 04:56:14 PM

        Come on wrote:

        Yes WOW UHQR is so great!

        I just once had a slight defect of an Acoustic Sounds LP and the way I see Chad (also from own experience), a respectfully addressed complaint can never be a problem and means exchange.

  • 2025-10-14 01:39:05 AM

    bwb wrote:

    As an Art Pepper fan with probably 80 of his records I am tempted, but I already have the 45rpm 2 LP Analogue Productions – AJAZ 7532, from the 2003 Fantasy 45 Series.

    If you could tell me this UHQR bests that version, I might be inclined to get it.

    • 2025-10-14 07:26:13 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      Turns out I have the double 45 AJAZ 7532 and will add a comparison to this review ASAP!

      • 2025-10-15 12:49:11 PM

        Bret wrote:

        I also would love to hear about that comparison.

  • 2025-10-14 11:20:33 AM

    TJH wrote:

    What a treat! On the other hand, I happily own the Craft RSD Mono which - in contrast to the reviewer - I liked a lot and still do. Great mono sound, great pressing. Also a treat for approx. 40 USD. In Europe, the UHQR is abt. 260 plus shipping (no duties applicable). Leaving the superfluous deluxe packaging and the scarcity feeling aside, what justifies the hard panned the difference?

    • 2025-10-14 06:49:11 PM

      Come on wrote:

      I just listened to the Craft Stereo vs. the RSD Mono and agree with Michael. The mono is rather one of the one point monos than of the 3D monos. A lot of ambiance room information and resolution, the stereo has, gets lost, the instruments sound rather pin point small than 3D with an aura and the music looses some appeal.

      The stereo is really left right and more so than for example the WOW, but it extents airy and 3D well behind the speakers in a nice, deep and wide enough space, the mono is more dry sounding.

      Hard to believe it can get any better than the Craft stereo, but I don’t doubt it.

      • 2025-10-14 07:27:41 PM

        Michael Fremer wrote:

        exactly what I heard with the mono. Room ambience gets sucked away for some reason etc....

      • 2025-10-15 07:03:16 AM

        PeterPani wrote:

        Loss of ambience is a sign of a digital step very often…

        • 2025-10-15 08:28:05 AM

          Come on wrote:

          No I don't think so, except for the resolution difference it's more difference than from the loss of a good digital step or a tape copy. It must be the mix, different equipment used or similar.

        • 2025-10-15 11:05:40 PM

          Michael Fremer wrote:

          True but not in this case.

  • 2025-10-15 10:14:13 AM

    Rashers wrote:

    I must have a dozen vinyl copies of this record. No OGs, unfortunately. There is no question that this is the best sounding and although I thought that the RSD mono would be the holy grail, I agree with Michael - the room feels smaller. I have many Contemporary OG monos and they sound amazing - I would love to hear from someone who has the OG mono of APMTRS and has made a comparison. I have been waiting for an ERC mono but I can see myself shelling out again, at some stage for the Mono UHQR. Thanks Chad for the smaller box. It will stay with the record, unlike the Steely Dan ones that are now in my attic.

  • 2025-10-15 12:23:42 PM

    Vocalion wrote:

    Having heard recent issues of this album in both stereo and mono, I'm delighted that I was able to get a copy of the Bernie Grundman RSD mono issue despite Michael having found it "undistinguished" and "not as well integrated" as he would have liked. No matter how well hard-panned albums like this are mastered and pressed, I find them distracting to the extent that I have trouble getting lost in the performance and will always opt for the mono if there is one available. I've tried adding a mono summing box to my processor loop, but the results in my system are a bit flat in comparison to true mono. I really wish that there were a high-end summing box available that would preserve the proper levels of left-center-right information.

  • 2025-10-15 10:05:52 PM

    Lemon Curry wrote:

    I also have the '23 Craft stereo, which sounds very good. Although having absolutely nothing come out of one speaker so often always pushes me to throw the mono switch. No loss of ambience detected in the fold, sounds great.

  • 2025-10-17 10:51:04 AM

    rl1856 wrote:

    Looks like I have a shoot-out ahead ! I have a 1973 "D4" pressing, 1984 pre OJC Fantasy reissue, 2023 Craft OJC Stereo remaster. I will have to check my c1984 pressing because discogs lists a variant of this pressing that has "D5" in the deadwax, implying that it may have been pressed using original metal work. Happy Listening !

  • 2025-10-17 01:55:40 PM

    Rashers wrote:

    I did a shootout of several versions of APMTRS that I own - OJC, a spectacular 1979 Japanese King reissue, Craft Mono and Stereo, UHQR, Craft SACD, Analogue Productions SACD. I hate to say it, but the Craft stereo was the worst - it made an edgy dynamic recording sound like lounge music. There was tremendous variability in the sounds of the others (the Craft SACD was equally poor), but I wasn’t over impressed with the UHQR. The 2002 Analogue Productions SACD, although mastered louder, had better instrument definition (particularly the piano), less obvious right and left separation, better soundstage with similar timbre to the UHQR. It was far more engaging. I’m sure that the vinyl AP 2x45 version is phenomenal (expensive, though).