Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

Jimi Hendrix Experience

Axis: Bold As Love

Music

Sound

Axis: Bold As Love UHQR Mono and Stereo

Label: Analogue Productions

Produced By: Chas Chandler

Engineered By: Eddie Kramer

Mixed By: Eddie Kramer

Mastered By: Bernie Grundman

Lacquers Cut By: Bernie Grundman

By: Michael Fremer

February 13th, 2026

Genre:

Rock

Format:

Vinyl

"Axis: Bold As Love" 45rpm UHQR Mono and Stereo Teach Old Musical Dogs A Few New Sonic Tricks

limited to 2500 mono and 4500 stereo copies

If you're old enough to have bought Axis: Bold As Love when it was first released in January of 1968, and you were a stoner, you'll not likely ever forget your first spin, especially in stereo, wearing Koss Pro 4A headphones. Eddie Kramer was never shy about using the pan pots and things flew around your head and shifted left to right to left, sometimes without purpose. But it was fun, it was a free-wheeling time and Jimi had as deft a sense of humor as he had fingers on string touch.

If you got your copy really early, you got this label

Jimi conjured up vivid images in his lyrics. Castles made of sand, smell of a world that has burned, I want to hear and see everything, and eleven moons played across the rainbows, "Go ahead on Mr. Business man you can't dress like me"... you didn't need mood enhancers to float away buoyed on Jimi's poetry. Kramer close mic'd him so he sang directly into the center of your head. Was that gum he was chewing?

There were and of course still are so many epic musical moments. The abrupt gear change to "I have never laid eyes on you, not before this timeless day...." always delivers as does the end of "Bold As Love" the phasey finale that the annotation incorrectly states was the effect's first use when Small Faces' "Itchycoo Park" had it in 1967. The albums' finale was as close to a musical description of an acid trip as has ever been recorded IMO.

Over the years I've bought and been given so many editions of this record. First the original U.K. Track edition that's a bit more polite than the raucous Reprise, and also more detailed and then later ones from Experience Hendrix at first cut from digital files but eventually from tape more times than I can remember. There are few bad ones!

This photo taken at Sterling Sound, which you might have seen here before, was from 1997 when the album was first re-issued on vinyl cut by George Marino from a high resolution digital file (Janie, me, Eddie Kramer). Kramer brought a test pressing over to hear on my system. That was fun!

Jimi at 45rpm UHQR should be better than Jimi at 33 1/3rpm UHQR, as good as the 33 1/3 UHQRs are/were in both stereo and mono. More spacious by a surprising amount, greater instrumental and vocal separation, absolutely no inner groove high frequency roll-off, notably better bass guitar attack and kick drum definition. I compared. if you have the 33 1/3 UHQR do you need this? Your call of course and I'm not here to say the differences are dramatic, because they are not, but they are obvious: after you've been playing this record for so many decades hearing something new or hearing something old in a new way is kind of amazing.

"Up From the Skies" and "Spanish Castle Magic" didn't register big differences but "Wait Until Tomorrow" really did, especially on the bottom end, which like most rock records really doesn't go all that deep but the definition was notably better. And the overall dynamic punch was obvious. Bernie's cut is outstanding and the UHQR pressing is silent and concentric. You pay a premium price and you get a premium product.

The Mono UHQR

This is a real mono mix, not a fold down. If you find the pan potting gimmicky and want a more pure musical, less psychedelicized version, the mono is highly recommended. It's timbrally very different from the stereo mix but that's partly probably due to having the same material coming from both speakers, so bass is essentially doubled. Everything is of course. So the real comparison would be one speaker centered in the room and I can't do that. Regardless, the balance is warmer, fuller and more powerful compared to the stereo mix.

Eliminating all of the back and forth gadgetry lets more of the solid musicianship shine through, which mostly spotlights Mitch Mitchell's drumming and helps produce a more coherent sense of the group's ability to play as one. There's plenty of depth/front to back layering developed too, something good mono mixes usually produce.

The shelves here are lined with every possible American, a few U.K. and a Japanese edition that I didn't pull out and compare to this one. Sorry! No time. But look, this is one of the enduring records of the 1960s and while some critics though the songs were too short and underdeveloped, how can you argue with "Up From the Skies", "Little Wing", "If 6 Was 9" (American title), "Castles Made of Sand", "One Rainy Wish" and "Bold As Love"? You cannot!

Every rock collection requires this record, whether or not you need a UHQR 45 is a personal choice but if you want what is probably the most consistent sounding throughout the sides with no end of side high frequency roll-off and of course zero distortion, this would be it. Mono or stereo.

Happily the tape remains in excellent condition. Chances are good you will hear things you never before heard, and chances are better you'll hear familiar things just sounding better defined.

The packaging is the newer box, not the older doweled box. There are people who complained about the doweled box taking up too much space and there are people now complaining that the new box isn't as "deluxe" as the doweled box. Kassem says both the cost of the doweled box and more to the point the delay time in getting it was creating havoc with release dates and keeping current. I say, just put the record on, crank it up as loud as you like it, and your complaints will surely wait til at least tomorrow.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: UHQR 0001-45, UHQR 0002-45

Pressing Plant: QRP

SPARS Code: AAA

Speed/RPM: 45

Weight: 200 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: original analog master tapes

Presentation: Box Set

Comments

  • 2026-02-13 05:34:23 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Looking forward to the Stereo UHQR very much, should arrive soon. From my experience with the gorgeously atmospheric “Are you experienced” UHQR 45 RPM Stereo vs. the 2013 33 RPM Grundman mono cut, I’m not sure I’ll need the bold as love mono, but let’s see.

    Michael, are you sure the mentioned Marino cut is digitally sourced? My copy’s sticker says “The authorized Hendrix family edition, all analog remaster from the original 2-track master tapes by Jimi’s original engineer”. And it sounds better than I’d expect from a digitally sourced one. Anyway, the UHQR will be even better.

    • 2026-02-13 07:24:32 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      michael is referring to a 1997 experience hendrix/MCA reissue cut by george marino at sterling, but before sterling had a preview head for the ampex deck. so that one was cut from the highest resolution digital they could get at the time. the 2010 marino stereo was cut from tape.

      i reviewed the analogue productions stereo/mono SACD on the old site, back when that came out. the mono mix is worth having, for me the highlight is the drum reverb on the mono 'little wing' that's not really there on the stereo mix. i think the mono on the AP SACD is better than the 2013 grundman AAA mono vinyl, the mono SACD/UHQR master has more texture while the 2013 vinyl is too smooth. UHQR stereo is definitive though, i'm sticking with the 33rpm cos i already have it but anyone who loves this album and doesn't have the stereo 33 UHQR should get the stereo 45.

      we haven't heard the 5LP stereo/mono/sessions box set that came out last year that was also cut by bernie grundman.

      • 2026-02-13 08:09:45 PM

        Come on wrote:

        thx...yes, my Bold as love Stereo Marino cut also sounds like AAA. Interesting that the mono UHQR might really be worth a it for an alternative experience, but probably the Stereo 45 RPM alone will do it for me. Those two Hendrix albums are probably the best sounding Rock recordings available with some of the best Rock music ever. Definitely worth such a reissue. I saw that I also have the combined AP SACD, will make the Little wing mono/stereo comparison.

      • 2026-02-15 01:40:26 PM

        Come on wrote:

        Had a little time to compare the stereo and mono SACD versions with the Marino AAA stereo LP (which until now is the only vinyl version I have). As Michael said, AP stereo and mono have a very different tonal signature. Stereo is very spacious and resolving, maybe even a little ragged sounding tonally and in soundstage, but fascinating. The AP mono sound is much more compact in tonality and certainly in soundstage, as it's mono. Less top end sparkle, less upper and more lower mids and slightly more bass. As you said Malachi, "Little Wing" is the most facinating mono experience, the other tracks I'd prefer in stereo, not only because with an active crossover I personally can adjust tonality if necessary.

        The Marino AAA stereo release is a compromise betwen the mono and stereo AP. It has at least the same weight as the mono AP plus the advantages of a stereo soundstage, but the tonality and soundstage is not as spacious and sparkling as the one of the AP stereo. It's a nearly perfect compromise for those who need mid centered, weighty sound from a stereo version.

        Looking forward now to the UHQR, as I expect an even much better sound than from the AP SACD. I fully understand that releasing the mono UHQR also makes sence, for "Little Wing"'s reverb and for those who need the more compact tonality. Having the Marino AAA as an alternative also makes a lot of sense as a combination of mono tonality and stereo soundstage.

  • 2026-02-14 11:12:04 AM

    PeterG wrote:

    I do not understand why the "bass is doubled" in stereo. IOW--wouldn't the mixing engineer account for that to insure that the bass is the same in both versions? Or are you pulling our legs, and I'm just too dense to realize? Please expand. Thanks

    • 2026-02-14 04:27:42 PM

      Come on wrote:

      I think this was a bit confusing, as 2 things were mixed up and what Michael added relativated it anyway...

      He didn't say bass doubled in stereo but doubled in mono. After that he added "Everything is (doubled)" (bass and the higher frequencies), which is correct and contradicted the first part. A bit too complicated to explain all optional backgrounds for why mono records often have a stronger bass than stereo ones. One reason that doesn't apply here is that fold downs (summed channels) have the bass increased by +3dB. As this is a true mono mix and no fold down, the reasons why bass is seemingly stronger than on the stereo must be different ones. One typical reason is that mono cutting is more robust for bass levels due to lateral movements only and this was often utilized at the time. Another is, that mono was mixed in a deliberately powerful way as the main format at the time. As this recording is no fold down and probably has a for cutting reasons anyway centered bass signal, I guess MIchael was just thinking loudly and corrected his statement immediately within the text. IMO the only reason for stronger bass in this case should be, because they simply intended it in the mono mix for the reasons I mentioned first.

      • 2026-02-14 08:02:23 PM

        Come on wrote:

        Near the end it should read… „As this mono recording is no fold down and the stereo probably has a for cutting reasons anyway centered bass signal…“

      • 2026-02-15 07:48:32 PM

        PeterG wrote:

        Thanks, very helpful

  • 2026-02-14 11:09:38 PM

    Buzz wrote:

    Love the review. Great description of a mind blowing listen on headphones.

    I was “too cool” to spend much time with classic Jimi growing up in high school in the mid 90s. Wasn’t into classic guitar gods and my brief exposures confirmed that he was just a very adept party trick type figure. Hey Joe was way overplayed in my surroundings.

    Thank you Chad for making me question my dumb assumption and take a good hard listen on AYE UHQR. I have the stereo 45 Axis waiting on the shelf the special night to break it out in a strawberry field that can hopefully last, forever?

    Ha. Can’t wait! This review pumped me up for the upcoming listen.

  • 2026-02-18 09:09:59 AM

    Gary Saluti wrote:

    I did indeed purchase the LP in 1968 and yes I listened to it through my Koss Pro 4A headphones at the time. Great Memories.

  • 2026-02-23 02:55:17 PM

    Steelhead wrote:

    Yes, fantastic album. I spun my original or close to it a month or so ago and still inspires. Hendrix is like the Beatles for this old ok boomer. Never get sick of listening to him and all these decades later still frequently pull and spin this fantastic artist.

    I am not going to spring for this one although tempted as my original is great shape and still brings it for me. I had a original MoFi Aja and thought that was the end all and be all until I bought the UHQR Aja. WHEW. That just destroyed my beloved MoFi

    Congrats to anyone scoring one of these mono's or stereo's.

  • 2026-03-04 06:56:35 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Chad, I love you!

    I now finally have the Stereo UHQR and you and Bernie next level nailed it again! This is the most airy, transparent, 3D, palpable rock record I ever heard besides the “Are you experienced” UHQR. To achieve this walk through level of detail and atmosphere without getting it to lean is really masterful!

    It certainly betters the AP SACD by far and also the fabulous Marino AAA cut. I still additionally recommend the latter for every fan, as it delivers a lot of additional midrange/upper bass richness, which can also be fun, depending on one”s mood, but it doesn’t have the detail level level, resolution, transparency and 3-D of the UHQR at all. I had a fantastic, live-like listening session with this UHQR today, it was fantastic! And by the way this UHQR once more was not only pressed flat, but also with zero background noise.