ZZ Top-Tres Hombres-45 RPM Vinyl Record
Lyra

Blink-182

Enema Of The State

Music

Sound

Blink182 Enema of the State One Step

Label: Geffen / UMe (Definitive Sound Series)

Produced By: Jerry Finn

Engineered By: Sean O’Dwyer

Mixed By: Tom Lord-Alge, Jerry Finn

Mastered By: Chris Bellman at Bernie Grundman Mastering

By: Malachi Lui

April 14th, 2026

Format:

Vinyl

Blink-182’s ‘Enema Of The State’ Gets A Definitive Sound Series One-Step

Definitive indeed, with inherent limitations

It’s always interesting to see how bands grow up, especially a band whose younger work is as juvenile as Blink-182’s. In this case, drummer Travis Barker is now dating a Kardashian, bassist/co-frontman Mark Hoppus seems to have a fairly normal existence podcasting and working on other bands’ records, and guitarist/other co-frontman Tom DeLonge co-founded To The Stars, a company dedicated to multimedia investigation and promotion of ufology, for which he has directed films, written novels, and made concept albums inspired by secret meetings with government officials.

The first evidence of DeLonge’s UFO obsession was “Aliens Exist,” the third track from Blink-182’s world-conquering 1999 album Enema Of The State. “What if people knew that these are real/I’d leave my closet door open all night/I know the CIA would say/What you hear is all hearsay/I wish someone would tell me what was right,” goes DeLonge’s nasally drawl. But before he could sink his money into UFO research, he had to make it. Thankfully, Blink-182 was one of the biggest guitar bands of the Y2K era, inescapable on MTV, and Enema Of The State has sold 15 million copies worldwide.

Blink-182 emerged from the San Diego suburbs in the early-mid 1990s, but didn’t break through until 1997, with their first major label album Dude Ranch and its second single “Dammit.” “But everybody’s gone, and I’ve been here for too long/To face this on my own, well I guess this is growing up,” sings bassist Mark Hoppus in the chorus, marking the arrival of Blink-182 as the band for millions of pubescent teenage boys coming of age at the turn of the millennium.

A grueling tour schedule followed, including four months on the Warped Tour, followed by DeLonge and Hoppus firing original drummer Scott Raynor over his drinking problem and replacing him with Travis Barker, who’s simply a better drummer. By the end of 1998, Blink commenced work on Enema Of The State with producer Jerry Finn, known for his balance between punk power and mainstream-friendly pop polish.

Eschewing late-90s CD bloat with only 12 songs over 35 minutes, Enema Of The State arrived into a mainstream landscape ruled by the mathematical factory pop of the Backstreet Boys and Britney Spears, aggressive nu-metal bands like Limp Bizkit and Korn, and East Coast rappers like DMX and Nas. Compared to all of that, Blink-182 related to suburban teenage boys whose lives revolved around chasing girls, skateboarding and getting drunk with the bros, and the anxiety of being forced to mature soon, because that’s what Blink wrote songs about. The songs on Enema Of The State bear simple melodies, with a deliberately immature attitude. “Life just sucks, I lost the one/I’m giving up, she found someone/There’s plenty more, girls are such a drag,” goes DeLonge’s chorus on “Dysentery Gary,” which sums up the album pretty well.

Not that that’s a bad thing, though, because the songs are catchy; there’s a reason why everyone on the face of the earth has heard “All The Small Things” and “What’s My Age Again?.” And there’s still some genuine emotional depth, like Hoppus’ “Adam’s Song,” written from the perspective of a depressed young man contemplating suicide. The following year, in fact, a survivor of the Columbine shooting left “Adam’s Song” on repeat as he hanged himself in his garage at 17.

How well Enema Of The State holds up depends on how much these songs—at the very least, the hits—have been in your life, or how much fun you’re willing to let yourself have. Whether or not you were there (I was not), listening to it now is a throwback to an era when guitars were still on the radio, but with the precision (not boardroom-manufactured) of the sort of pop music emergent then and still sort of dominant now. Generally, prime Blink survives better than many of their contemporaries because they mastered such a specific approach that resonates with a specific audience that never fully fades away—there are new teenagers every year. The following record, 2001’s Take Off Your Pants And Jacket, is just as good (arguably better), but this is the one that captures not only the style, but the specific moment in cultural time when it mattered to so many.

Enema Of The State wasn’t released on vinyl until its 10th anniversary in 2009, though it was finished on tape and the mixes were assembled into sides A and B cutting masters. Those fully assembled 1/2” 30ips flat masters have never been used for disc cutting until this Definitive Sound Series one-step cut by Chris Bellman, limited to 3000 copies pressed at RTI on Neotech VR900-D2 premium vinyl. All previous editions, including the 2016 SRC audiophile pressing cut by Kevin Gray, have been sourced from digital files.

So far, Warner’s Because Sound Matters and Interscope/Capitol's Definitive Sound Series one-steps, produced by Tom “Grover” Biery, have all lived up to the latter series’ name—they are the definitive pressings of their respective albums. However, some are bigger leaps than others, considering some recordings have inherent sonic limitations and others already have great existing pressings. This one-step Enema Of The State is indeed definitive, though it’s still a sterile sounding mix without much depth. That’s just what this album sounds like, and Chris Bellman more or less cut what was on the tape without trying to add “texture” or “richness” or “space” that isn’t and shouldn’t be there.

I don’t have any LP pressings to compare, but I compared the DSS one-step with the original CD master by Brian Gardner at Bernie Grundman Mastering, and an anonymous 96kHz/24bit digital remaster unceremoniously dumped out in 2020. The original CD is a bit glassy, but is nicely shaped and controlled. Meanwhile, the 96/24 remaster is a cleaner and smoother transfer, but drums get lost in the lower midrange sludge and whoever churned it out botched the track indexing. Chris Bellman’s EQ on the one-step strikes the perfect balance between clarity and weight, and while it’s still a bass-shy mix, there’s more bass than both digital masters. The real highlight is Travis Barker’s drums, which cut through with muscularity, and the digital masters can’t approach his cymbals’ physicality and natural decay on the one-step.

Generally, the one-step offers some dynamic upgrade, but mostly in little microdynamic details rather than the overall picture, because these mixes were already slammed on the tapes. “Mutt” is the most notable dynamic improvement, but despite not having the digital masters’ peak limiting/clipping, Enema Of The State is the least dynamic of the Definitive Sound Series or Because Sound Matters one-steps. That’s simply what this album is, and the one-step is a responsibly faithful presentation.

What’s interesting is that, while Enema Of The State was tracked analog and finished on 1/2” 30ips tape, the majority of the album mixed by Tom Lord-Alge has a cutoff around 22kHz, which means that it passed through some sort of digital before being mixed or printed to analog tape. I can’t find any information on what it was or why it’s there (some sources claim Lord-Alge used MIDI sample triggers for some of Barker’s drums), but the digital step back in 1999 isn’t exactly the reason for the album’s sound. “The Party Song” and “Wendy Clear,” the two songs mixed by producer Jerry Finn, go above 22kHz on the 96/24 remaster, so those were all-analog. Those mixes are just as dry and sterile as Lord-Alge’s mixes on the rest of the album, and despite being fully analog are actually cloudier with less articulation and punch.

All things considered, the Definitive Sound Series one-step of Enema Of The State is the best the album will ever sound, between Bellman’s balanced EQ and the beautiful black backgrounds of the Neotech VR900-D2 vinyl. The packaging by GPA Global is also appropriately deluxe: a matte tip-on gatefold (with the Parental Advisory label still there as needed for an album from 1999), a single sheet lyrics and credits insert (which I wish was printed on thicker stock for such a deluxe product—especially in this case, since there’s no “original pressing” to replicate), a DSS certificate of authenticity, and a spot-varnished outer slipcase. Some people hate these one-step slipcases, but I think they’re fittingly luxurious without obnoxiously taking up too much space. Whether or not this one-step is worth $100 depends on how much you like this album and how good your system is. Is it better than the recent commercial pressings done fully in-house at GZ, Connectiv, or Takt Direct? Inevitably yes. Is it a demonstration quality record that reveals revelatory new sonic detail? No, but it’d be the last copy of Enema Of The State (as the core album, at least) that you’d ever have to buy. For hardcore fans or nostalgists, that’s probably worth it. For more traditional audiophile types, keep your expectations in check but approach with curiosity.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: DSS 8 / 602478915192

Pressing Plant: RTI

SPARS Code: AAA

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 180 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: 1/2" 30ips Analog Master Tapes

Presentation: Box Set

Comments

  • 2026-04-14 01:32:10 PM

    Come on wrote:

    I think there are enough truly excellent recordings (and music) to choose from for the most elaborate and expensive reissues in the audiophile business, and I don’t see the point in producing such an expensive One Step edition for an "8ish" recording quality, even if it ends up being the best of all other mediocre releases.

    • 2026-04-14 10:45:08 PM

      Tim wrote:

      I partially agree (perhaps 50%).

      On one hand, I think an "8" is even too high for Blink 182: its REALLY basic stuff..

      On the other hand, I am fully on board with Audiophile issues (especially 'higher end' offerings) that are using fresh music material... Im REALLY sick othe same 50 Jazz / Rock reissues time and time again.

      I do not need more Miles, Coltrane, RCA living stereo releases... enough is enough.

      The world is full of other music.

      • 2026-04-15 10:32:02 AM

        Come on wrote:

        I also agree with the other 50% of your statement. Audiophile reissues mainly seem to be made for us boomers, with corresponding repetitions. It seems there is much less interest in expensive audiophile reissues in other generations.

        Although I was rather referring to the sound quality „8“, I’d say for both, music rating and basic sond quality, it would make sense to make a quite safe choice for an ultra expensive reissue (not necessary so much for a similarly well remastered 20$ Craft release). As you say, the world is full of great and great sounding music to be reissued, so why choose an 8/8 one? It seems to me a bit like mounting a large rear spoiler on a Chevrolet Spark. Nice for Spark fans probably, but of limited use.

    • 2026-04-15 03:08:17 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      i think it's fine to do these ultra-deluxe audiophile reissues of recordings that aren't sonically perfect. not every recording can be great and there are still people who want the best possible version of their favorite albums, regardless of baked-in sound quality flaws that can't be fully 'fixed.' grover is targeting these not just to the usual audiophiles, but to superfans. blink-182 has a lot of fans, and the ones who were around back in 1999 have now hit 40 and might have more disposable income to buy nice things like a one-step pressing to play on a good hi-fi system. and there are still plenty of better sounding recordings that are getting high quality reissues, and there's more to come. i think the curation of the DSS/BSM one-step series has been great, much better than what the other high-end audiophile reissue imprints have been doing lately (some of those records are great, but c'mon, do we really need another marquee moon only three years after the last one?)

      • 2026-04-15 03:47:08 AM

        Tim wrote:

        My point on the '8' was in relation to the music moreso than audio.

        As someome who fits your description very well; I can say wholeheartedly yes - but also no... I have a list of about 2000 albums from the 80s or 90s more deserving than something from Blink182.

        Ask and I shall list them :)

        • 2026-04-15 05:49:51 AM

          Malachi Lui wrote:

          i wasn’t debating you on the music! was responding to the first commenter

  • 2026-04-14 07:00:42 PM

    Paul Robertson wrote:

    Really enjoyed this review, and the overall insight provided. Thank you. It reminds me of an in-depth review of a Kayne West release that you did a number of years back. It introduced me to his music, although no I’m not a fan of him as a person. Super insightful that review was regardless. And those bundled reviews of current new releases you haven’t done in a while are missed. No they weren’t as in-depth obviously but that’s not what they were about and I enjoyed them a lot. Your assessment of the recent PF Wish You Were Here box though seemed……..I can’t say and still remain sounding respectful to be honest……….it’s also nice that MF I can only assume wanted a different generational take on that one versus his own, and of course anyone can ultimately review anything especially timeless music………having said that I could be out to lunch on the age thing as your knowledge of Bowie front to back is simply outstanding

    Please keep up the interesting work you do, as I can assure you it’s appreciated!

    • 2026-04-15 03:44:40 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      appreciate the appreciation but feel free to give your honest opinions even if harsh! but i stand by my wish you were here box set review, which was focused more on the curation and remaster quality than the musical content that we've read about a zillion times.

      review explosion is coming back very soon, and i will also review the new kanye record, which gets into really interesting territory about the limits of auteurism. first-run physical copies of the album use an earlier version with almost entirely AI deepfake vocals, meanwhile the digital release version is mostly ye's actual voice. welcome to 2026!

  • 2026-04-15 12:48:26 AM

    MrRom92 wrote:

    Malachi, thank you for an excellent review and your thorough investigation of the different versions available. I came to many of the same conclusions when I checked out those 24/96 files several years ago.

    That version is problematic, to say the least, Aside from weird glitchy track indexing/clipped intros, etc, the party song (one of the two that appeared to be All Analog) seemed to be an entirely different mix than the original album and most LP pressings!

    There have also been other discrepancies in the past depending on which pressing you got, which is weird for an album that has a finished master. One pressing inexplicably had the clean version of “What’s my Age Again” inserted, etc, dumb stuff like that.

    So, with this in mind; I have a few questions for you, that I’ve been wondering about this one step, and you are just the right person with the knowledge and ears to investigate further and confirm these things.

    1. Does the mix of The Party Song match the 24/96 or the original CD? (And you do hear the mix differences I’m talking about, right?)

    2. Only the unedited versions of the songs are present and no “clean” edits have inexplicably made their way into the master this time?

    3. Does the mix used for Mutt match the original album? There is an entirely different mix (single tracked vocal) that was used for this song on the American Pie soundtrack CD and given their propensity to mix things up their, uh, mixes, in past releases of the album, I wouldn’t put it past them to use that wrong mix by accident either.

    Anyway, I’m just glad there’s finally a version directly from the original tape with no extraneous ADA stages, how it always should’ve been done regardless of whatever digital stages may have been extant in the finished master from 1999.

    • 2026-04-15 03:41:40 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      just checked all of that for you.

      1. 'the party song' sounds closer to the original CD than the 96/24. and yes, i do hear the difference, the 96/24 weirdly sounds a lot wider for some reason. not really a fundamental mix difference but yes, it's odd. it could be a weird mastering choice via exaggerated EQ and stereo widening, as i don't really hear any drastic differences in instrument levels or placement between that 96/24 version and the CD/one-step. i'd assume that the 96/24 was done entirely from the same 1/2" 30ips master tapes used for the one-step, though of course they have hi-res digital backups of everything and on the digital side, it's hard to tell who's even doing this stuff.

      2. no clean edits as far as i could tell. the one-step has the 'sodomy' line on 'what's my age again'

      3. 'mutt' matches the original album and is the correct mix on the master tape and therefore the one-step

      i assume that the weird variations in earlier LP pressings is because whoever was in charge of those just grabbed the first digital files they found in the UMG server and sent it off. the one-step is the first time that this LP has been cut directly from these master tapes, and i highly doubt the tapes have been handled frequently. digital is even easier to mislabel and make archiving mistakes with. you're right, it's weird that there have been so many previous reissue mistakes for an album with a finished, assembled set of analog masters. it's not like the 2014-onward remaster of oasis definitely maybe where they used the wrong mix of 'slide away' (and never corrected it, not even when they reissued it again in 2024) presumably because it was on a different reel, since those albums don't seem to have assembled analog cutting masters.

      • 2026-04-15 06:19:42 AM

        MrRom92 wrote:

        Thanks for the further investigative work, Malachi. All sounds like good news to me that this was finally handled by someone who wasn’t asleep at the wheel. I will absolutely get this Eventually™ - even without news of this pressing coming, I sold my 2009 MTS pressing last year with the knowledge I would probably never spin it again, considering how crummy it was. And I made more than it would cost me to upgrade, sooo. No complaints from me.

  • 2026-04-15 04:14:59 AM

    Gregg Durkin wrote:

    Just got mine last week. I did a comparison with my SRC pressing.

    Mid range to top end has a much better level of clarity, like a veil has been lifted. Vocals are much better - articulate and tonal improvement. Cymbals are better - presence & decay.

    Mid range to low end is also much better. Guitar, drums & bass tones are noticeably better.

    Soundstage is better, imaging is better.

    It’s quieter - Neotech VR900 D2 vinyl - translucent.

    On my system, this is significantly better than the SRC.

    There are certain limitations of the original recording.

    For me, I’m glad I got it & it’s worth it for the improvement in sound qualit.

    VPI Prime 21 Soundsmith cart All analog tube system - tube phonostage, preamp & monoblock amps.

  • 2026-04-16 11:15:36 AM

    Georges wrote:

    100$...

    • 2026-04-17 02:58:13 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      yes, all of these one-steps are $100. and not because of basic record label greed, but because these are significantly more expensive to make. for a run of 3000, that’s 5-6x the mastering and setup costs of a normal three-step record, because each lacquer can only make one stamper in a one-step process. more test pressings to have to listen to as well. the neotech VR900-D2 premium vinyl formulation is also more expensive.

      these are worth it for people who really like a given album in the series, and want the best possible copy of it. but i understand that not everyone can afford them or that not every record is worth $100 to every collector. though i just got my pet sounds one-step test pressing the other day and i can say that i’ll never settle for listening to another copy of that album ever again, the one-step is by far the best it’s ever been. perhaps the biggest upgrade in the entire series. i played it for a non-audiophile friend recently and he heard the difference. so some of them are fully worth it when it’s a monumental upgrade. something like the blink-182 one-step is the definitive pressing but the potential is more limited by the source recording, so maybe more debatable as to how ‘worth it’ it is

      • 2026-04-18 06:26:28 PM

        Michael Fremer wrote:

        Another source of the higher price is that pressing on VR900-D2 is far more difficult and it results in more rejected records.....