Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

Keith Jarrett

The Köln Concert

Music

Sound

Label: ECM

Produced By: Manfred Eicher

Engineered By: Martin Wieland

Mixed By: Martin Wieland

Lacquers Cut By: Daniel Krieger at SST (Schallplatten Schneid Technik Brüggemann GmbH/SST GmbH)

By: Michael Fremer

March 6th, 2026

Format:

Vinyl

Keith Jarrett's Legendary Köln Concert Gets a 50th Anniversary Special ECM Reissue

This is the all-time best selling solo album in jazz history & best selling piano album

MQA is a plot to take over and ruin your music and make the devious and power hungry villain Bob Stuart wealthy. Maybe run the world. The reaction to MQA borders on that level of hysteria and for now it's kind of shut down or on hiatus (Lenbrook owns it) but the first demo of it I heard at a CES some years ago was unforgettable and made me a believer even if a later demo I attended with Rick Rubin made him a skeptic or worse and that surprised me.

Keith Jarrett's The Köln Concert was Bob Stuart's demo disc of choice. Not the original all-analog vinyl issue, but the CD issue, ECM first released in 1983 at the beginning of the CD error. Those in attendance who owned the original vinyl (originally released in the United States by Polydor, and cut by Robert Ludwig at Sterling Sound) knew the recording well—and if they didn't know the entire story behind the production they at least knew it was recorded in the Köln Opera House late in the evening following a performance by the opera company and that it was the first jazz performance there ever.

Without knowing at the time how it was recorded, it was always a fine sounding production with the piano image well focused and presented in three-dimensions on a big stage, followed by hall reverb that helped define the moderately sized, 1300 seat space.

Of course such a popular best selling record would be among ECM's early CD releases and so in 1983 in the infancy of the format out it came. Until Stuart played it, I'd never heard it. The vinyl couldn't be beat at the time I figured, and boy was I right! The CD Stuart played produced a flat, unfocused soundstage. The hall reverb was mixed in with the piano. There was no hall sense and no piano focused on the stage in the hall. I think I may have remarked at the time that it was like Vincent Price in "The Fly". It came out the digital end all mixed up.

Stuart explained that the complaints about early CD sound were in part due to A/D converters that had poor phase response. They blurred the time domain. We are most sensitive to the time domain. It's responsible for our very survival.

Stuart said he'd come up with the way to "de-blur" the digital file and restore phase in the time domain. He played the "de-blur"'d excerpt from The Köln Concert and voila! Soundstage, image, piano in focus, reverb echoing off the stage wall behind the piano, or from wherever, but locked in correct time with the piano to produce a convincing three-dimensional image. "Had that been CD", I remarked, "I'd not have so strenuously objected to it". Well, maybe.

Recording engineer Martin Wieland used a simple but effective rig to put the concert to tape: a pair of Neumann U67 vacuum tube microphones feeding a Telefunken M5 studio quality vacuum tube based tape recorder (the Wikipedia page erroneously identifies it as a "portable" unit). No wonder the recording and record sounded so alive and three-dimensional.

Later the entire story became known—about how the opera hall staff had accidentally supplied a baby grand Bösendorfer, not the 290 Imperial concert grand Jarrett had requested, and how the piano was in pretty bad shape, how the pedals weren't working correctly and how the sound was tinny on top and weak on bottom, which explains why Jarrett concentrated in the midrange. You can read all about it on the Wikipedia page. As the legend grew the the descriptive language became more flowery and monumental—that's not meant to in any way diminish the greatness of the music or how Jarrett performed it.

If you're not familiar it's as accessible as hell and in no way technical noodling. It's funky, and at times oddly country and western though it never devolves into an identifiable music slot, which is part of its greatness and why it's not in any way dated now, nor will it likely ever be. Side one is the 26 minute opening improv and I'm not going to attempt to describe it, followed by applause. The second improve runs longer—36 minutes—which necessitated it being broken into two sections, one 15 minutes long and the other on side 3, running 19:19.

At the risk of annoying Keith Jarrett further in case he reads this site (I annoyed him when decades ago in The Absolute Sound I reviewed his only singing album), the second improv has an uptempo opener, with joyous feel that reminded me of A Charlie Brown Christmas (not that there's anything wrong with that!) before it intensifies into a monumental storm and then on side three turns inward, melodic and majestic.

ECM celebrates the 50th anniversary with a special two LP 180g edition housed in a "tip-on" style gatefold jacket with a glued in full sized booklet containing an essay by Thomas Steinfeld in English and German that provided a useful historical background, and included two black and white photos. There's also a signed free-standing photo inserted in one of the jacket pockets.

Daniel Krieger at SST cut lacquers from what sounds like a somewhat dynamically compressed file, which brings me back to the MQA opening. The new records have good instrumental focus, but the reverb isn't expansive. It doesn't define the space. It's almost like a feeble glow behind the notes that never opens up the room space. The notes themselves are "clangy" and lack harmonic structure. The original RL vinyl sound so much better, and more like a piano in a live space, it's ridiculous. I do not know how this happens or why this happens but as with the Miles Davis Plugged Nickel set cut by Krieger at SST this one will sound "good" not referenced to anything else, but not particularly good and wholly inadequate compared to the original AAA record—and it's more than just the "sound". It's the musician's intent that's almost completely lost. Jarrett is hitting the keys with varying intensity and creating micro and macro-dynamic communication doing that, but it's totally lost in the clanging and banging, which is not at all what's expressed or communicated by the original vinyl Bob Ludwig cut 50 years ago.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: ECM 1064/1065 780 3132

Pressing Plant: Pallas

SPARS Code: ADA

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 180 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: hi res digital files?

Presentation: Multi LP

Comments

  • 2026-03-06 07:43:16 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Good summary including other interesting information! Good that you found out about the release differences.

    After my today’s Pletnev desaster and after I read your feature, I took the chance to once more compare my original old Koln Concert LP with an earlier 180g reissue than the one you reviewed here. More or less the same result as you describe. The old one sounds gorgeous with lots of reverb and crystal clear attack, dynamics and overtones when Keith is hitting the keys. The newer 180g is softer, more damped sounding, has less and shorter reverb with reduced dynamics and overtones in comparison.

    I still listen to the old one while writing this and I didn’t remember it sounding so good, last time was quite a while ago. To all who have a later reissue: get an OG or you don’t know how it can sound.

    When you announced this review several weeks ago, I called them about all those release differences. As so often when I call labels, they ask not to publish what they said, so I also won’t do it in this case. Finally I had the chance to form an opinion about how similar different reissue releases are - or not and about how much they can control or care for controlling the differences in production of such reissues - or not.

    All who have this first release, listen to it again…you probably also didn’t do it for a long time and your setup developed…it’s shocking how much better this sounds now and how great the music still is!

    In digital form I have two Japanese SACD versions and the 2023 24/96 release. The latter is a bit better sounding than the SACD‘s and not really worse sounding than the older 180g vinyl reissue but clearly worse than the OG.

    • 2026-03-06 09:30:23 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I always say never bet against an RL original!

      • 2026-03-06 10:19:05 PM

        Come on wrote:

        Just as we recently had it about the Reference Recordings Nojima:

        The „Arnold Overtures“ is the only other record they made AAA as well as from hires files later. One of the very few other chances to compare what AAA achieves (although it’s not completely apples to apples as mastering engineer and gear was different, too).

        The better quality from the old AAA is as stunning as with the Nojima. Everything is freer, airier, more extended, more dynamic. The digitally sourced one also sounds very good, but the comparison shows what immediately gets lost if one already starts with a digital source.

      • 2026-03-08 12:10:23 AM

        Jazz fan wrote:

        The OG would have been cut in Germany, not the RL US cut.

        • 2026-03-08 03:42:47 AM

          Come on wrote:

          I'm on the way to compare them soon. I guess they probably sound the same, but let's see.

    • 2026-03-10 02:03:00 PM

      Robert May wrote:

      Many (most?) of the ECM US Polydor releases (before US were Warner Bros) are Masterdisk - Bob Ludwig, and in general are excellent sounding. Interestingly, I have both a German OG and Polydor Bremen/Lausanne sets, and latter are just re-labelled German records - same run-out stampings - although the German has a much nicer textured box.

  • 2026-03-06 11:32:55 PM

    Mark Ward wrote:

    At the risk of "over-sharing", I lost my virginity to the strains of this record (as, I imagine, did quite a few others). Thus it holds a special place in my affections. Naturally it was the vinyl original, owned by the young lady in question, who clearly had as impeccable taste in music as she did in men... I cannot recall how we dealt with the side flips, but it was a 33 after all, and at that age I am sure we had more than enough time to accommodate our needs before the hearty applause acknowledged our (sorry, Keith's) performance and necessitated going over to the turntable and lifting the tonearm (of course my girlfriend might have had auto-lift on her deck - ah, those were the days...) Things might have gone very differently if the record had been cut at 45 (or maybe not, come to think of it; I was, after all, as impetuous as any callow and inexperienced youth...)

    Of course I went out and bought my own copy asap.

    The question asks itself: would I have been so lucky had this cut-from-digital copy been on the turntable vs. the AAA original? Maybe so, but would it have been as satisfying, nay "organic", an experience...?

    • 2026-03-07 02:50:45 PM

      Marc wrote:

      This story has been really hilarious. And honest. Had to smile during the entire read. Following your exciting story your lovely girlfriend surly had an auto-lift on her deck😅 Now, the last two questions are: Did you marry her? And,lastly, to which record strains did Mr. Fremer lose his vir…? 😅Can he „better“ your story? I think that the commentary function on trackingangle is so important as you can learn so much from others’ experiences, sometimes it is just refreshing. Wonderful.

      • 2026-03-07 03:35:21 PM

        Come on wrote:

        Now that we know what time it took for Mark. the better question is: what was the format (single or LP) to which MF lost it? Wait he's smart, I guess he built an endless tape or he had an automatic LP changer!

    • 2026-03-07 07:03:30 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I think Mr. Softee would have paid a visit

  • 2026-03-07 03:54:56 AM

    PeterPani wrote:

    Music must be an 11. There is no other record in my huge music collection played more often over the years.

  • 2026-03-07 04:45:43 AM

    Will wrote:

    I was going to comment after your Plugged Nickel review, but then thought again. However reading your review here, I would like to say that the issues you describe on SQ are not dissimilar to my recollections of listening to other SST cuts from Columbia/Sony (Dylan and Davis) that are from presumably digital sources. As to what the cause is I can only guess. The result is that the SQ is ok but not fantastic and the records end up in the garage.

  • 2026-03-07 02:19:38 PM

    Kevin Jones wrote:

    …”at the beginning of the cd error…” love it

  • 2026-03-07 04:41:36 PM

    Josquin des Prez wrote:

    I was a bit suspicious about this reissue, now confirmed by your review. I have an old U.S. release/repress on vinyl. I'll stick with that.

  • 2026-03-07 07:08:34 PM

    Michael Fremer wrote:

    Music when I lost it.... ok you asked: It involved Ronnie Dio (no, I didn't lose it to him). Ronnie Dio and The Prophets were a local Cortland/Ithaca band when I was a sophomore in college. Dio played a Hofner bass and the band performed Beatles covers. We'd consumed many Purple Passions and my date and I were quite sloshed. They were playing "I Need You". The song begins (as I'm sure everyone knows) "You don't realize how much I need you". As he sang that my date put her hand down my pants and dragged me from the room and we made our way upstairs into a silent room. No music. But The Beatles song gets the nod.

    • 2026-03-09 04:43:27 PM

      Anton wrote:

      "Hey! Wait a minute! That's not records, more new records you're sneaking into your room! Samuel! Our Mikey has become a man!"

    • 2026-03-10 07:55:05 PM

      Marc wrote:

      The trophy goes to Mark. Smoking Purple Passions, being sloshed, the needy Beatles song do not speak for a mutual conscious decision😂. You probably can be happy that you did not lose it to Ronnie Dio. 😂 I did not know the band. I like the music. You would only have topped it if the girl‘ s name had been Brenda😅

  • 2026-03-08 12:38:44 AM

    Anton wrote:

    This great article reminded me how much I like this album. I agree with others and I’m going to stick with the OG pressing.

    Part of my flight of fancy while playing this today led me to look up which of his concerts Keith Jarrett thinks was his best performance. He says it was the 1992 Vienna concert. What is so interesting about that is, guess what?

    • 2026-03-08 01:09:14 AM

      PeterPani wrote:

      I have no idea. I was there 1992 and I would like to exchange the experience with that of the Köln concert or Bremen, a week later. And I guess, there were a lot of other great gigs, not recorded, in the ‘70s.

      • 2026-03-08 07:02:24 AM

        PeterPani wrote:

        I may add a hearty recommendation for the better understanding of this time: the wonderful coming of age movie “Köln ‘75” from 2025: https://m.imdb.com/de/title/tt20414360/

    • 2026-03-14 03:03:30 PM

      Anton wrote:

      To answer my own silly question: Vienna 1991 (released in 1992) is the concert the artist feels is his greatest work, yet is has never been released on vinyl!

      Mr. Fremer, can you get right on this? Maybe in time for RSD next month?

  • 2026-03-08 08:05:41 AM

    Rashers wrote:

    This is one of the biggest selling jazz records of all time, and ECM undoubtedly have the original tapes and probably the original metal masters. It is intriguing that they chose to use digital files for this major release. Many of the reissues in the past few years have been AAA and one would have thought that, if ever there was to be a major reissue, this would be it.

    • 2026-03-08 09:45:03 AM

      Come on wrote:

      It could also just be a different, inferior AAA cut. There’s an article on soundstagenetwork comparing the OG‘s with the later reissues. They also mention that ECM told them, the reissues are also AAA. What I hear as limited in openness, overtones, room ambience and reverb from the reissue, they hear as more pleasant on the reissues and brighter on the OGs. So there are always different opinions.

      Also for the pure digital productions there were big differences. Most of the Bauer and Oslo Talent studio recordings were much worse sounding imo than those of the other ones (Rainbow Oslo and others).

  • 2026-03-08 08:07:29 AM

    Rashers wrote:

    The extraordinary Sun Bear 10LP box set reissue was AAA

  • 2026-03-08 11:52:07 AM

    Spin The Black Circle wrote:

    I’ve been looking for the RL version, and can’t find one anywhere. Or at least a good copy. Most of the ones that are listed as such on Discogs, aren’t actually the RL. I’ve contacted several of the sellers to confirm that it’s an RL, and the ones who have responded confirmed that they were listed under the wrong variant. That’s my biggest gripe with listings on Discogs, but that’s another topic for another day. I’ll keep looking….

  • 2026-03-08 03:10:09 PM

    Mark Dawes wrote:

    My copy of this LP (a Spanish 1984 pressing) came from my local district library in Paisley, Scotland, when they sold off their vinyl collection at 20p or 50p per record at some point in the late 1980s. I picked up at least five Keith Jarrett LPs from them, including my favourite "Changeless". While they are great records, the copies I acquired had been loaned out to countless library borrowers so they are not in great condition. Some reviewers on Discogs are complaining about their version of the "Köln Concert" reissue mentioned here by Michael, including warped discs and sound on only one channel. The holy grail pressing seems to be a 'Pitman' pressing: https://www.discogs.com/release/1259362-Keith-Jarrett-The-Köln-Concert

  • 2026-03-08 08:29:42 PM

    MrRom92 wrote:

    It’s interesting to read so much praise for the RL cut. For a US issue of a record from a German label one would have to assume Ludwig was supplied with a copy tape, there should be a marked difference between a German pressing and a US. Unless ECM handled things differently in the 70’s?

    • 2026-03-09 10:48:58 AM

      Come on wrote:

      Yes, the only argument against your assumption would be if all countries used a cutting master of the same generation. I will post my comparison results as soon as I have both here.

    • 2026-03-09 06:10:50 PM

      Terje Leknes wrote:

      I have yet to hear a US pressing of an ECM album that sounds better than the original German pressing. I'm not saying it does not exist, but I have not come across it.

    • 2026-03-12 01:10:27 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I have not heard an O.G. German pressing of this one.

  • 2026-03-09 06:36:13 PM

    bwb wrote:

    "I think I may have remarked at the time that it was like Vincent Price in "The Fly". It came out the digital end all mixed up."

    It wasn't Price who went through the disintegrator-integrator and got scrambled. He played the brother of the fly.

    • 2026-03-12 01:09:31 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      Help me! Help me!

  • 2026-03-09 07:34:31 PM

    RickS wrote:

    Ive had this album maybe 20yrs. Always liked Jarretts trio jazz albums. This one never got played much. NOW Im listening real good. Sounds fabulous. So, did I mistakenly luck out with an RL copy? A Mint one I might add. I looked on sides 3 and 4, no dice but there is a tiny Sterling stamp. Side 1, nope. Side two RL and Sterling!

  • 2026-03-13 06:28:29 PM

    Jack Graham wrote:

    100% correct---RL did some great mastering on a few Metheny ECM's as well....!

  • 2026-03-19 04:06:24 PM

    Come on wrote:

    So now i have both, the Sterling and the german OG cut. And I contacted the only person still available and at least roughly knowing about those times of ECM productions.

    The person said, usually there should have been cutting tapes for each country, so it's assumed that the tape generations of all country's pressings should be the same. The person also said that for CD, at the time, procedures to modify level, dynamic and sound were more intense (in a bad way as we see it today).

    The comparison of the two OG LP cuts is very interesting, as both sound slightly different on more or less the same high level. The german pressing is cut louder and has a little wider piano soundstage (not ambiance soundstage) and has a little fuller piano sound. Both have the same better and more airy soundstage, dynamics and transients as we heard in the comparisons of the Sterling to the later reissue (in MF's article and in the comments above). So the Sterling cut has a little thinner and more sharply cut piano attack of high notes (but not in a bad way), the piano sound to the right tends more towards the middle than on the german cut, but the ambiance of the room towards the back is a tiny bit more realistic and airy on the Sterling than on the german cut.

    To me it seems they are both from the same tape generation with slight differences through the cutting process or gear. It's very difficult to decide which to prefer, as they are very similar and the small differences show advantages for both, depending on the track or personal focus. No one who has either really needs the other. For freaks the comparison is interesting and the decision what to listen to difficult.