Acoustic Sounds
Lyra

Miles Davis

Miles 1954: The Prestige Recordings

Music

Sound

Miles Davis '54

Label: Prestige / Craft Recordings

Produced By: Bpb Weinstock / Nick Phillips

Engineered By: Rudy Van Gelder

Mastered By: Paul Blakemore **

Lacquers Cut By: Kevin Gray

By: Fred Kaplan

December 17th, 2024

Genre:

Jazz

Format:

Vinyl

Miles Davis in 1954

A grand 4-LP box set marking the great trumpeter's pivotal year

When jazz aficionados see the phrases Miles Davis and Prestige Recordings in the same sentence, they think of the “marathon sessions” of 1956, where the trumpeter and his quintet (known in retrospect as his 1st Great Quintet: John Coltrane, Red Garland, Paul Chambers, and Philly Joe Jones) blazed through four albums’ worth of material (released over the next few years as Relaxin’, Steamin’, Workin’, and Cookin’) in just two days (May 11 and October 26), to complete his contractual obligation to the small indie label before hitching his rising star to Columbia Records.

But this boxed set, issued by Craft Recordings, is something else. As suggested by the title, Miles 54, it contains all the tracks that Miles recorded for Prestige two years earlier—specifically, the 20 tracks laid down, with various bandmates, over five sessions from March to December of 1954. The ’56 quintet sessions established Miles Davis as a great musician and an innovative bandleader who changed the sound and shape of jazz (and would do so again several times over). Miles 54 documents the year when Davis first found his sound and pivoted toward greatness.

 The first of the five sessions, recorded March 15, has Miles just returning to the New York jazz scene, having regained his strength after kicking a heroin habit. Had this marked the end of his road—if, say, he’d reverted to the needle and soon after died of an O.D.—he would not be widely remembered today. Still, these three tracks, which were originally released as a 10” LP (and later combined with the four tracks of the April 3 session into a 12” album called Blue Haze), are pleasant.

 It's with the April 3 tracks that the Miles we all know begins to take shape. First, he discovered the cup mute, which coated his horn with a crisp burnished tone, and he keeps it fastened to the bell throughout. Second, his pianist and bassist, Horace Silver and Percy Heath, had clearly picked up some confidence and verve between the two sessions. Third, drummer Kenny Clarke, replacing Art Blakey, added some crisp brushwork to the mix.

 On April 29, Lucky Thompson and J.J. Johnson joined in, on tenor sax and trombone, for what was properly called an “all-star” band, blowing a blend of hefty blues and complex harmonies that had never before quite been heard. As the pianist-critic Dick Katz said of the session (quoted in Dan Morgenstern’s liner notes to this boxed set), “It is as if they all agreed to get together to discuss on their instruments what they had learned and unlearned” over the previous decade—“what elements of bop…they had retained and discarded.”

 On June 29, the two horns were busy elsewhere and Sonny Rollins filled in on tenor sax, furnishing a few of his own compositions (“Airegin,” “Oleo,” and “Doxy”) as well as his gruff tone and whirlwind improvisations. Rollins gave Miles an idea of what sort of tenor sax sound he was seeking and led him to hire John Coltrane a couple years later. (Rollins by then was a leader in his own right.)

 Finally comes the coup de grace, the masterpiece of the box, the Christmas Eve session, with Thelonious Monk and Milt Jackson joining Heath and Clarke. (When this session was released as an album in 1959, its title, Miles Davis and the Modern Jazz Giants, was no hype.) It consists of just four songs—Jackson’s “Bags’ Groove,” Monk’s “Bemsha Swing,” Davis’ “Swing Spring” (one of just three Miles originals in the box), and Gershwin’s “The Man I Love,” including two takes of the first and last songs (more about which later). This session is a jaw dropper; it was at the time and still is.

 The box set as a whole is not a “best-of” Miles Davis collection. Even for the era, you’d do better with the Great Quintet albums recorded two years later. Still, these sessions are crucial for understanding how Miles Davis—and, in turn, how jazz—evolved in the middle of the 1950s, how it became modern jazz as we now know it. And the best sessions from the box—the one with Sonny Rollins and the Christmas Eve finale with Monk and Jackson—are extraordinary by any standard.

 Now for the sound (mainly very good news) and Craft Recordings’ packaging (handsome but in many ways not good news). The April 3 session marked engineer Rudy Van Gelder’s debut (certainly with Miles, probably with Prestige), and the contrast with the session before (though it sounds good, especially for the era) is striking. The drums are crisp and dynamic, the bass thumpingly clear and precise, the trumpet golden, the other horns billowing brass and air, and the piano is percussive and blooming—in many ways, fuller- sounding than the pianos on many of RVG’s later albums.

 Unfortunately, in some of the later ’54 sessions, Van Gelder ladled on some artificial reverb, maybe to make his parents’ living room sound more like a club or concert hall. It’s not annoying—the sound throughout the rest of the box is still very good, especially Jackson’s ringing vibes on the last session—but he could have done without the echo.

 Last year, Electric Records Company released one of the these albums, the Miles Davis All-Stars’ Walkin’ (the session with J.J. Johnson and Lucky Thompson), and it sounded terrific. It’s a great tribute to report that Craft’s pressing of those tracks sounds just as good (for a fraction of the price). As for comparisons with other vinyl reissues, I have only Analogue Productions’ two-LP 45rpm pressing of Miles Davis and the Modern Jazz Giants (part of its Fantasy 25 series), and, perhaps because it is 45rpm, it sounds better: all the instruments are richer in their harmonic overtones. Still, the Craft’s sides of this material are excellent. Due to the compilation nature of this set, the cutting sources were 192/24 bit files. To cut from tape would have required cutting up masters to assemble.

 Now for some complaints. The booklet should have cited the titles of the albums where the tracks were originally laid down. (It mentions none of them.) It lists all the musicians involved, but you have to read the liner notes to learn (if you didn’t know already) who is playing on which tracks. It also would have been useful to group all the pieces from a session onto the same side or the same slab of vinyl instead of dividing them up (for instance, putting three tracks from one session and one track from the next session on one record, then the remaining tracks from the second session on the next record). There is also a serious mistake: On Disc 4, the listing for the two tracks of “The Man I Love” are reversed; the booklet says Take 1 is first, then Take 2. In fact, it’s the other way around. This isn’t a small point. At the start of what is really Take 2, we hear the famous exchange where Miles tells Monk not to solo this time and Monk complains about it. This is because Miles didn’t like Monk’s soloing, which was rather erratic, on Take 1. If you think Take 2 is Take 1, you might wonder if there was a take before Take 1. *

 Finally, there is a credit problem. The booklet properly notes that Kevin Gray cut the lacquers but says that Paul Blakemore mastered the tapes. In fact, Gray mastered, as well as cut, these LPs from the original analogue tapes. Blakemore mastered the digital versions (on CD and streaming). Gray deserves full credit for a splendid job.

*Turns out, upon inspection, I was wrong about the labeling of “The Man I Love,” Take 1 and Take 2. The labeling is right. (Miles wasn’t telling Monk not to solo, but rather not to comp behind him.)_F.K.

**You may have noticed the credits changed from AAA to AAD and mastering from Kevin Gray to Paul Blakemore. FK did check with KG about this and he mistakenly told FK it was cut from tape. He'd confused this project with an OJC. Mistakes happen. We correct them when they are discovered_ed.

Music Specifications

SPARS Code: AAD

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 180 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Mono

Source: 192/24 bit files

Presentation: Multi LP

Comments

  • 2024-12-17 10:44:31 PM

    Tim wrote:

    Great write up Fred. Appreciated the context you painted of the sessions.

    $125 is somewhat of an ask IMO -> with shipping and import taxes to Europe it's closer to $200. Ouch

    • 2024-12-18 03:50:12 PM

      bwb wrote:

      $125 for 4 LPs is only $31 a disc. On US Amazon it is currently (18 Dec) only $108 so either way hardly a big ask.. Not much they can do about European shipping and duties.

      • 2024-12-18 05:09:36 PM

        Tim wrote:

        Congratulations for being American, but for the rest of the world $200 USD is a tall ask for a 4 disc set. Also; it's not 4 separate albums; it's a single collection with 4 LPs.

        Also; unlike Craft records premium offerings; this isn't pressed on Neotech v1 or v2; it isn't a one step; and according to the latest update it isn't AAA either.

        For that, many will not part with $200.

        Enjoy your US Amazon prime delivery.

        • 2024-12-18 10:02:42 PM

          bwb wrote:

          Despite being an American, I'm not parting with even $108 mainly because I have most of that material on other records, but in any case, $31 for a single vinyl record is NOT a big ask, no matter if singly or in a box set.

  • 2024-12-17 11:57:02 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Very good information and writing! I agree with all of it, up to the AP45 comparison, which usually is as you say + more open sounding - 3D and top end wise. Although it was KG”s older mastering chain, they seem to have done some magic beyond the 45RPM difference at the time. For some early 45RPM Blue Notes it’s different.

    • 2024-12-18 02:33:56 AM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      Before writing this review Fred Kaplan asked Kevin Gray about cutting source and he said analog tape so that was how it was listed when the review was published earlier today (December 17). Kevin Gray read the review and then realized it was actually cut from hi resolution files due to the compilation nature of the set. He alerted us after the review was published and I just updated it to reflect that it was sourced from digital files.

      • 2024-12-18 08:58:04 AM

        Come on wrote:

        Thanks for the update, this explains it here! I wished the clarification of sources would be generally allowed for the mastering guys or expected as a matter of course from the labels, who should be transparent. Would be interesting to compare for example the AAA Japanese Blue Haze pressing to this one. Sometimes they sound surprisingly good, sometimes their tape copy origin is obvious.

        It would also be interesting to read a feature, how much more expensive and complicated AAA productions are for labels, compared to ADD or AAD. If so, the times will change for us even more quickly I suspect and we should try to name it in order to influence and slow down this process. But probably there are already more vinyl buyers who don’t care or are not aware or can’t hear the difference on their setups. I hope the wish for AAA doesn’t die out when generation z reaches the age of getting the typical clientele for this demand.

      • 2024-12-18 04:28:24 PM

        Come on wrote:

        I wanted to add, that I understand the compilation reason as one example where AAA seems to make little sense without dubbing everything to another tape.

        If I’m not alone, the producers of such releases just have to see that most of their typical customers prefer or even just buy if they plan their projects for vintage jazz, so they can be done AAA.

        If it’s not like that and a majority already doesn’t care anymore, then this majority of vinyl projects is t for me anymore, I’ll listen to them alldigital then.

  • 2024-12-18 02:28:32 PM

    MrRom92 wrote:

    Have to wonder why they did not just issue a box of the original albums containing the ‘54 material. Then they could be all analog and presented in something resembling their original context.

    • 2024-12-18 06:44:24 PM

      Simon Walker wrote:

      I agree and so frankly the article lost me at “ Due to the compilation nature of this set, the cutting sources were 192/24 bit files.”

      • 2024-12-18 08:43:11 PM

        Come on wrote:

        Imagine there are different source tapes for various tracks on one record. How could one cut that record without making one cutting (tape) master from those various tapes first? And if this cutting master was made, it would probably have lost more sound quality compared to the original masters than the 24/196 file.

        • 2024-12-23 11:52:40 AM

          MrRom92 wrote:

          There are only so many ways to skin this cat. The original tapes were either already dubbed to make album cutting masters in the 50’s (in which case, they could go back to the session reels and copy new, even higher quality cutting masters than they could’ve done 70 years ago.)

          Or more likely, the album cutting masters were originally just cut and compiled from the 1st generation session reels in the first place. In which case, they should just. You know. USE them.

          • 2024-12-23 06:07:21 PM

            Come on wrote:

            My understanding was…they have never been compiled like this before…so then there’s no session tape they could have used.

            You now may ask…why did they aim for a compilation that wasn’t able to be produced AAA? My answer would be „because they don’t care about AAA that much (unfortunately)“.

  • 2024-12-18 07:33:38 PM

    Rashers wrote:

    I was wondering if any Miles fans out there had bought both this and The Prestige 10-Inch LP Collection (Volume Two) - a box set released for RSD in 2015. This features the original LPs in their sleeves in a fabric box. I think they sound great - but am curious how they compare with Kevin Gray's cuts. Did they use the same source files or did they go back to the original masters in 2024 (I presume they did given the KG has been working away AAA on the OJC series and others)?

    • 2024-12-18 10:04:51 PM

      Mark Ward wrote:

      I've been wondering that myself. As far as I know, these earlier Prestige records came out in two separate boxes for RSD, then in one box with everything. I saw a used copy of the latter in Amoeba some years ago for $200, and could kick myself now for not picking it up since these cost way more now. However, I suspect the mastering and plating etc. on this new release is superior - but would likewise love to hear from someone who actually owns both versions.

  • 2024-12-19 02:53:51 PM

    Tom Donald wrote:

    Too many omissions and indifference to details with the accompanying booklet. I'll pass on this one.

  • 2024-12-19 05:39:33 PM

    rl1856 wrote:

    Not AAA- Pass. Out of curiosity, has anyone compared this new release to the AP 33 box from the mid 90s or to original pressings ? I have 1st or 2nd pressings of all of the material, along with 2fer and OJC as backup.