Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

Morrissey

Make-up Is A Lie

Music

Sound

Make-up Is a Lie  Morrissey

Label: Sire

Produced By: Joe Chiccarelli

Engineered By: Bill Mims

Mixed By: Patrick Dillett

Mastered By: Frank Arkwright at Abbey Road

By: Malachi Lui

March 10th, 2026

Format:

Vinyl

'Make-up Is A Lie': Not Morrissey's Comeback... Yet

It says nothing to me about my life

If you’ve bought a Morrissey ticket anytime since 2012, there’s statistically a 30% chance he will cancel the show, often with little notice. This could be for any number of reasons: he’s sick or exhausted, or the venue didn’t meet his list of demands (such as removing all meat products from the premises), or he somehow has financial difficulties getting there (even when the show has sold well), or he just doesn’t feel like performing and would rather sit at the hotel bar and drink with Noel Gallagher. These cancellations have obviously infuriated fans, many of whom travel to see him in far-off places, despite widespread advice to never travel specifically for Morrissey. Yet they keep buying tickets, hoping that he will show up. And indeed, when he does show up, he’s usually on time and amazing. I’ve bought two Morrissey tickets and seen two gigs, and it’s a religious experience. The first time I saw him, at New Jersey Performing Arts Center in November 2024, I ended up next to a group of middle-aged superfans, including one who’s seen him over 20 times in the past 15 years. Now 66 years old, Morrissey’s voice has held up remarkably well, and his energy is very much still there. The gamble is worth it for how great he is.

At that 2024 concert, he said, “As you know, nobody will release my music anymore. As you know because I’m a chief exponent of free speech. In England at least, it’s now criminalized… You cannot speak freely in England. If you don’t believe me, go there. Express an opinion, you’ll be sent to prison.” See, Morrissey’s had a rough decade until now. BMG dropped him after 2020’s I Am Not A Dog On A Chain, and in 2022, he signed to Capitol Records to release Bonfire of Teenagers. That album was produced by Andrew Watt—the younger producer who’s re-energized (and excessively autotuned) old rockers like the Rolling Stones, Ozzy Osbourne, and Iggy Pop—and featured a song with Miley Cyrus, as well as the title track about “England’s 9/11,” the 2016 Manchester Arena bombing. Relations between Morrissey and Capitol quickly soured; according to him, they refused to release the album despite holding onto the rights. Eventually, Morrissey bought Bonfire of Teenagers back from Capitol, and spent a few years shopping it around to record labels. Apparently, they all told him that it was great, yet for political reasons were all too afraid to release it. Notably, he refused to release it independently, as he demands the prestige and promotional backing of being signed to a major label.

Amidst all of that, he commenced work with producer Joe Chiccarelli on another new record, originally called Without Music The World Dies, then You’re Right, It’s Time. After further changes to the tracklist and cover art, that record is now called Make-up Is A Lie, and as Warner revives the Sire imprint (which brought The Smiths and Morrissey to American audiences decades ago), the man finally has a record deal. During a recent show at London’s O2 Arena, he proclaimed, “The fact that I’m on this stage is an incredible accomplishment in itself, because as you know, the jealous bitches tried to get rid of me.” (As for Bonfire of Teenagers, it will surely come soon as part of this deal, perhaps even this year. Based on live performances of its songs, it seems to be the best Morrissey record in a long time.)

Morrissey’s music since 2006’s Ringleader of the Tormenters has been a mixed bag: each album has something of value, though his last few records have been increasingly bogged down with filler songs, contradictory political sentiments, and lazy, redundant lyrics. The rollout for Make-up Is A Lie wasn’t exactly promising: the title track and first single comes across as self-parody, and the album packaging is plastered with unflattering photos of Morrissey in a soyjak pose. And if the promotion was engineered for memeability, it didn’t get anywhere with that either.

As it turns out, Make-up Is A Lie is one of the most careless, uninspired records of Morrissey’s entire career. Most of his records at least have some sort of overarching worldview or point to make; Make-up Is A Lie is a scattered collection of songs, few of which are lyrically or musically invigorating. Six years on from the sonically diverse I Am Not A Dog On A Chain, Morrissey’s social criticisms have become less biting, and his emotions less defined. On that last album, the song “What Kind of People Live in Those Houses?” offered a poetic attack against suburban complacency passed down from generation to generation. On the new album’s former title track “You’re Right, It’s Time,” Morrissey’s opening missive is, “I wish to move away from those who stare at screens all day/I want to speak up and to not be trapped by censorship.” He’s right (though not in the way he thinks he is), but it’s not exactly the material for a compelling song.

Continuing the brutal opening stretch are the songs released as advance singles. If Sire/Warner selected these as singles, I’d suspect internal sabotage; if Morrissey himself pushed it, then he’s shooting himself in the foot. “Make-up Is A Lie” tells a story about a poet in Paris who silently tells Morrissey an important message, even after her death: “Make-up is a lie! All make-up, make-up is a lie! All make-up is a lie, all make-up is a lie!!!” He sings this redundant chorus with gusto, as if the entire world needs to take notice.

Indeed, Morrissey recorded this album in France, and of course he has something political to say about it. “Notre-Dame” is a repetitive song heavily implying that Islamic extremists caused the 2019 Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris fire, and that the government has actively engaged in a coverup. “Notre-Dame, we know who tried to kill you/Notre-Dame, we will not be silent/Before investigations, they said ‘there’s nothing to see here!’” he sings. (Early live versions had the chorus line as “Before investigations, they said ‘this is not terrorism!’.”) Many conspiracy theories have proven somewhat valid, except this one has been well debunked. I don’t think “Notre-Dame”’s messaging is particularly problematic—just braindead—though the exaggerated public perception of Morrissey’s politics doesn’t help his case. After he wore a For Britain pin on TV in 2019, the far-right has claimed him as one of their own, even though he’s never really been a rightist. More than anything, he holds socially traditional views on British culture and incoherent opinions on international relations.

The album proceeds with a bafflingly bad cover of Roxy Music’s “Amazona,” which is out of place and even messier than the original song, though Morrissey’s vocal performance is good. “Headache” is whispery and insignificant, but things pick up at the end of side one with “Boulevard.” The opening lines are a bit cliche, but it’s an epic, yearning ballad with a dramatic vocal performance and strong lyrical imagery. “I’ll have one more pass/At a long cold glass/And then throw up in an icy bathroom/Somewhere, just off the boulevard,” Morrissey sings in what comes across as his not-perfectly-successful attempt at a Jacques Brel song.

Side two doesn’t save Make-up Is A Lie, but it’s more consistent. “Zoom Zoom The Little Boy,” this album’s “save the animals” song, is the catchiest thing here, even if its lyrics (“He wants to save the cats and the dogs/And the bats and the frogs/And the badgers and the hedgehogs”) are nothing more than an elevated nursery rhyme. “The Night Pop Dropped” has a decent chorus, “Kerching Kerching” has moderately clever lyrics undermined by a cloying vocal melody, and “Lester Bangs” is a nice tribute to the titular writer, albeit rather sappy (“3000 miles away/This nerd hangs on your every word/I lean, and you are leaned upon/When all my youth went oh so wrong”… Bangs’ own single for Ork Records tickles the ear a bit more). “Many Icebergs Ago” reminisces about past haunts but musically doesn’t go anywhere. Closing track “The Monsters of Pig Alley” is one of the best songs on the album, a reflection on success and youth through the lens of a great who’s sustained his career into old age. “The monsters of Pig Alley say/Why don’t you pack it in and come back home?/We’re not sophisticated/We’re overweight and dated/But we love you.” Along with “Boulevard,” it’s the most honest, emotive, and substantive piece on the album.

Given the long, fraught wait between I Am Not A Dog On A Chain and Make-up Is A Lie, some fans are anxious to declare this record seriously great, his best since Ringleader of the Tormentors or 2004’s comeback You Are The Quarry. I even saw one person online say that it’s the best thing he’s done since The Queen Is Dead. None of this is true, of course, as it’s not even as good as I Am Not A Dog On A Chain or even 2017’s Low In High School (half of which is garbled nonsense, but at least it’s tuneful and “I Wish You Lonely” is an all-time great Morrissey song). Also infuriating is that the download-exclusive (for now) bonus tracks “Hello Hell” and “Happy New Tears” are better than most songs on the proper album (even if these bonus tracks don’t sound as if they were properly mastered). More than anything, Make-up Is A Lie reminds me of another recent album well below its artist’s standards: Taylor Swift’s The Life of a Showgirl. Both of these albums are glossy, polished, serviceable pieces of product, which upon even cursory logical inspection range from mediocre to truly dreadful, but it’s all listenable or at least “pleasant” enough that these artists’ respective rabid fanbases can delude themselves into liking it if they try hard enough.

The sound of Make-up Is A Lie is also not great: everything is indistinct, congealed, compressed, thick mush. You can tell that everything is slathered in reverb but nothing exists in a distinct space, nor does anything have shape or texture. Frank Arkwright mastered the 96kHz/24bit master for digital distribution, and presumably cut lacquers too (there’s no runout identification, though the GZ Media codes indicate it’s an external lacquer). The digital master is at normal modern levels but not as heavily limited as I expected, not that it matters because the mix isn’t very open to begin with.

I received a sealed promo copy of the 140g standard blue vinyl edition (marbled red vinyl and zoetrope picture disc variants also available), pressed at GZ for Europe and one of GZ’s US facilities (Memphis or Nashville) for the American market. My copy is flat “enough” though has light to moderate surface noise throughout much of the album. It’s cut a little quiet (50 minutes on a single disc), yet sounds slightly better than the digital master; the cut to lacquer brings a bit more spatial separation and smooths over the grain in Morrissey’s voice caused by digital time-stretching and pitch correction. The packaging is merely a standard direct-to-board gatefold with a printed inner sleeve, with all the lyrics and credits plus more photos of soyjak Morrissey. If you like the album or need to have everything Morrissey releases, it’s a fine enough edition for $30, though don’t pay more than that.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: 093624829799

Pressing Plant: GZ Media (US affiliate)

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 140 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: Digital Master

Presentation: Single LP

Comments

  • 2026-03-10 08:42:58 PM

    Arnaldo D'urso wrote:

    Comparing Morrissey’s album to Taylor Swift says a lot about your taste and knowledge of music. Stick to reviewing music for which you have more sensibility for. To think that “reviewers” like you get free promos is kinda F’d up.

    • 2026-03-10 09:20:10 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      cmon now. i’ve made it clear that i’m personally a HUGE morrissey fan. this album just isn’t very good by his standards, though compared to everyone else, shit morrissey is better than a lot of people’s best. i DO like it a lot better than swift’s recent album (which i compare it to cos it’s mediocre/bad in very similar ways), but that’s mostly because i’m very much in the morrissey cult and not in the swiftie cult. still, southpaw grammar remains his best solo record (followed by viva hate and your arsenal)

      • 2026-03-11 11:34:41 AM

        Arnaldo D'urso wrote:

        I will tell you where you failed as a reviewer and “journalist” Your review spends more words regurgitating the same old laments of concert cancellations and Morrissey’s political outbursts rather than highlighting the real changes this new album ushers in. You make no mention of his new band and cowriters. Gone is Boz Boorer his collaborator of 30 years. The reemergence of Alain Whyte writing the two best songs on the album (Monsters & Boulevard) is an important detail you neglected to mention. Alain also wrote the two excellent outtakes (Hello Hell & Happy New Tears) which you rightfully acknowledged should have been included in the album. (IMO way better than Notre-Dame & MUIAL) In a typical journalistic fashion you put words into Morrissey’s mouth just to fabricate controversy. Where in the lyrics did you read that the conspiracy alluded to regarding the Notre Dame fire is accusing “Islamist extremists”? An assumption you made that will only fuel the accusations of Moz being a racist. While you do highlight Monsters of Pig Alley as being the best track on the album I feel you slighted its greatness. Hands down this is the best song Morrissey has written in 30 years. It will go down as a classic, up there with Everyday is Like Sunday. Regarding the other standout track, Boulevard you offer contradictory opinions in separate sections. First you blast it as a “not perfectly-successful attempt at a Jacques Brel song”. Later you revive it as “the most honest, emotive and substantive piece on the album”. So which is it? Whispered vocals of “Headache” are not new to Morrissey. Maybe you’re not familiar with “Lifeguard sleeping, Girl drowning”? More importantly, you missed the mark on Morrissey’s lyrical craft & wit. Not only is it in fine form, it’s evolving and maturing to incorporate different metric styles and melodies. Short verse rhyming (akin to rap flow) is more present in this batch of songs than ever before. However the overall tone of your review is one of disdain rather than disappointment from Morrissey’s album on behalf of a “HUGE FAN” like you. MUIAL is not a perfect album by all means, but it deserves an 8/10 in my book. Tracks 2,3 &4 are the lowest points, but the peaks outweigh these flaws. And finally, while it may be cool for you to name-check the often forgotten and neglected, although excellent, Southpaw as his “best” album, every true Morrissey fan will name “Vauxhall & I” as his finest.

        • 2026-03-11 11:50:05 AM

          Come on wrote:

          I don't know anything about Morrissey, but I love this exchange and different opinions, even if they may sometimes be wrong or unfair, or if the text (in the eyes of a hardcore fan) may be guided by the desire to be superficially controversial.

          One of my favorite jazz magazines regularly publishes a record review of the same album by two editors. One is in favor, the other is against, and neither holds back. It's fun, no matter which side the reader is on.

          • 2026-03-11 12:16:35 PM

            Arnaldo D'urso wrote:

            Trashing or Glorifying an album always garners more attention. It's the 101 of news media. Sensationalism always gathers audience. Malachi & Fremer are probably relishing in all this chatter about a record review.

            • 2026-03-13 10:35:26 AM

              Jeff 'Glotz' Glotzer wrote:

              I would rather think you are relishing the attention. Sensationalistic, indeed. I've seen Morrisey more than once, and I've been paying attention & purchasing since The Smith's 1st album. I feel there is a lot of validity in what Malachi has said here and previously on this site about Morrissey and his art. Sometimes biting humor has it's place in communicating truth, especially when the focus is as outlandish as Morrissey himself.

              Giving me the information with his disdain or admiration is why I love Malachi's writing- that notion of expressing his truth, without fear of reprisal. Because you and he value different songs & albums for different reasons is as pedestrian as having an opinion itself. Your built no arguments for why Malachi is wrong about this or that song and it reminds us that everyone is different and there is no 'accounting' for taste, even if you attempted such.

          • 2026-03-11 05:29:19 PM

            bwb wrote:

            I agree, not familiar with Morrissey's work, but entertaining exchange... listening to "Vauxhall & I" now so hope I can come to appreciate it. Isn't streaming a wonderful thing ??

            BTW.. what jazz magazine are you referring to?

        • 2026-03-11 01:29:39 PM

          Malachi Lui wrote:

          ok now that you’ve articulated your criticisms (though maybe next time use some paragraph breaks?), i can actually respond properly.

          i admit i probably should’ve said something about the current lineup and co-writers, but that’s a big can of worms that wasn’t the most necessary to delve into. i think fans excessively blame jesse tobias for morrissey’s downfall, and while the whyte/boorer iteration of morrissey’s solo band was definitely the best overall (given how long it lasted), i don’t think alain whyte deserves ALL the praise either considering he co-wrote ‘notre-dame’, which is musically redundant and dull.

          as for the lyrics of ‘notre-dame’… well… he doesn’t directly SAY the terrorists were islamic extremists, but it’s heavily implied given that that’s the relevant conspiracy theory, and because of the original chorus lyric. i’m nicer to most of morrissey’s politics than most people seem to be, but interpreting this song otherwise would be overly apologetic and journalistically irresponsible. considering the context, he makes it very clear what he’s trying to say.

          ‘the monsters of pig alley’ is very good but not his best song in 30 years. it’s not better than ‘alma matters,’ ‘irish blood, english heart,’ ‘first of the gang to die,’ ‘i will see you in far-off places,’ ‘you have killed me,’ ‘it’s not your birthday anymore,’ or ‘i wish you lonely,’ to name only a few basic favorites of post-southpaw morrissey.

          ‘boulevard’ is a very good, perhaps even great song. to my ears, it’s also trying to be like a jacques brel song, and might not be entirely successful in that attempt. both aspects can be true at once.

          i’m familiar with ‘lifeguard sleeping, girl drowning’ and its whispery vocals. i’ve spent the past few weeks listening to almost nothing but solo morrissey in anticipation for this new record. however, that doesn’t detract from my opinion that ‘headache’ is pretty lyrically insignificant.

          i believe my review of this album is even-handed and certainly more generous than what you’ll see from the guardian, rolling stone, or pitchfork. also, there’s no single album that every morrissey fan must ‘admit’ is their favorite, and i have no motivating factor aside from my own opinion to name southpaw grammar as his best

          • 2026-03-11 02:32:46 PM

            Arnaldo D'urso wrote:

            First of all the GUI of this comment box doesn't format text properly. So, no need to be sarcastic and snippy about it. I posted the comment with paragraphs, and although I am not a highly regarded author or journalist, I do know a thing or two about articulating my thoughts clearly in a written format. (paragraph)

            Doing a crash-course on Morrissey's 40+ years of work in a few weeks does not really qualify you as a fan nor expert. (paragraph)

            "Alma Matters" & "You have Killed Me" are not as good as "Monsters of Pig Alley" ask any fan (paragraph)

            On the matter of Notre-Dame, all I can say is that assumptions are journalistically irresponsible. For readers that are unaware of the non-Morrissey conspiracy theories, it's journalistically irresponsible to put words in Morrissey's mouth. He does enough damage when sticks his own foot in his mouth, we don't need "journalists" to imply or assume non-factual stances. Yes, ND is an uninspired lyric and song, but that's not the issue here (paragraph) I've read quite few of your reviews and I don't care for your arrogant, pedantic and condescending style of writing. (paragraph)

            Finally, I don't think you will ever understand Morrissey. You probably weren't aware of his music when his last album was released. (How's that for condescension?)

            • 2026-03-12 12:56:49 PM

              Michael Fremer wrote:

              Well Arnaldo, your assertion that Malachi did a "crash course on Morrissey...in a few weeks" is something you made up and an incredibly cheap shot. Up until that, this was interesting (though believe me, nothing I 'relish').

              Malachi has been a Morrissey fan for as long as I've known him which is now close to 8 years. So to take him to task for prepping for the record and turning that into a "crash course" etc. is really deserving of an apology IMO and perhaps then if you care to continue the Morrissey debate on less personal terms, it would hold interest even for readers who are not Morrissey fans. Ok?

              • 2026-03-13 02:48:25 PM

                Arnaldo D'urso wrote:

                Michael, I guess I am guilty in ASSUMING (based on how he articulated his rebuttal) that Malachi did a "crash course on Morrissey" in a few weeks as much as HE is guilty of ASSUMING that Morrissey was alluding to an "Islamist terrorist conspiracy” when he described the subject matter of the lyrics of “Notre-Dame”.

                Once Malachi’s apology and redaction of the review to correct that non-factual assumption is posted, I have no problem apologizing.

                My critique to Malachi’s review was mostly factual. Different tastes and opinions can only be accepted, not debated. No review is absolute, rather just a subjective view. That’s why an album can garner different reviews and grading. I don’t believe in music reviewers as “authorities” and I frown upon the ones that exhalt or trash albums with sensationalistic stances. “Make-up Is A Lie is one of the most careless, uninspired records of Morrissey’s entire career”. That is a very heavy statement and it irked me to the point of making my initial comment.

                I’ve been a fan of The Smiths & Morrissey for 40+ years and don’t need a refresher course to review his album. If Malachi did so, then I laud him for being diligent. Showing off his homework just came off wrong.

                Maybe you can check out my review on my YouTube channel and critique me there.

                https://youtu.be/YwarWA7pmIs?si=uIOnL-_NpQKpDdpu

            • 2026-03-12 12:57:55 PM

              Michael Fremer wrote:

              I don't know why you are having trouble hitting the return key to format a new paragraph...

              • 2026-03-13 02:50:54 PM

                Arnaldo D'urso wrote:

                FYI, you have to hit the return key TWICE (in this comment box) for a paragraph space, unlike any other text editor.

          • 2026-03-11 04:58:42 PM

            Todd wrote:

            I keep picturing Morrisey frantically (much like this new album cover) punching at the keyboard when this website asks for a login name. And in an epiphany, he calmly types "Arnaldo D'urso"

    • 2026-03-11 12:56:20 AM

      David wrote:

      Arnaldo D'urso … why take the time to spread hate, especially in such a boring and unoriginal way.

      • 2026-03-11 01:20:20 AM

        Malachi Lui wrote:

        the irony is that he’s attacking me for negatively comparing this morrissey album to taylor swift’s latest… using the exact same tactics that swifties use to attack anyone who’s even slightly critical of her. but morrissey fans kinda are just as insane, which is a little more understandable considering how negatively he’s been portrayed in the media over the past decade (it’s a bit unfair, but he’s also kinda brought it upon himself for being rather inarticulate when he talks about hot button political issues, especially in the UK)

        • 2026-03-11 11:41:07 AM

          Arnaldo D'urso wrote:

          Wow, that's one I've never heard. Morrissey is "rather inarticulate". HAHAHAHA! Morrissey has been annoying the hell out of me with his outbursts, but I can't deny his talent. Morrissey's fans aren't insane, just passionate.

          • 2026-03-13 10:39:01 AM

            Jeff 'Glotz' Glotzer wrote:

            You're definitely coming off unhinged.

          • 2026-03-13 02:04:21 PM

            Robert German wrote:

            Sure, Jan. (eye roll)

  • 2026-03-10 10:02:49 PM

    Todd wrote:

    Always fun to read your reviews.

  • 2026-03-11 08:24:10 AM

    PeterPani wrote:

    Agree fully! Morrissey seeing live is listening and looking to a performance of art, If you are a fan, you have to buy the ticket and hope. It is similiar to wanting to see a great opera singer. Friends of mine paid huge money to see Anna Netrebko in Nabucco last week here in Vienna. But she got fever and missed it. And Nabucco is really a boring opera to sit through with an average cast.. But as a fan you have to take the risk - it is part of the game. Taylor Swift did not perform her 3 gigs of the Eras tour in Vienna, too. Last year a tried terror attack made her cancel the shows. But the Swifties in Vienna had a good time - dancing and singing with themselves all over the places in Vienna. They chose a tree in Vienna for friendship tree and this is still a place for them to tie their friendship bands to the tree. Very nice. Love the 2006 vinyl, Morrissey Live at Earls Court!

  • 2026-03-11 09:26:49 AM

    Charlie wrote:

    This is a very perceptive review. I’ve been an ardent Moz fan since 1995, and he is still a great live performer (when he shows up) but I really find it difficult to get into his more recent work. The main problem for me is the lyrics. While he used to write poetic, reflective, and subtly humorous lyrics, oftentimes now his lyrics are repetitive, crude, and even mean-spirited. It is a shame.

    • 2026-03-11 01:32:16 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      fully agree with you, though i still think some of his mean-spirited latter-day lyrics are funny in how random they are. case in point: ‘if you’re gonna kill yourself, then for god’s sake, just kill yourself’ on ‘jim jim falls’.

  • 2026-03-11 03:49:04 PM

    Charlie wrote:

    By the way, regarding Southpaw Grammar, that is an album that definitely should be reissued on vinyl! Existing copies are very rare and expensive.

  • 2026-03-11 07:22:08 PM

    Silk Dome Mid wrote:

    I enjoy Malachi's work, but I did get a laugh from him knocking Arnaldo's lack of paragraph breaks. After all, Mr. Lui can't even manage to capitalize the first letter of a sentence.

    • 2026-03-11 08:43:39 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      stylistic choice / generational thing. the actual review was submitted with all the proper capitalization, and i'm pretty sure that not a single edit was made.

      • 2026-03-12 12:50:16 AM

        Silk Dome Mid wrote:

        Oh yeah, I get it. You can certainly write. Just thought that particular paragraphic criticism was funny.

      • 2026-03-13 08:01:36 PM

        Arnaldo D'urso wrote:

        My lack of paragraphs was a “stylistic choice” too. The difference between me and you is that I didn’t call you out on it. The nerve you have…

        • 2026-03-13 11:25:24 PM

          Malachi Lui wrote:

          eh. bit of a difference i’d say. one is readable. one is not. but then the first paragraph of autobiography is four and a half pages long and it’s plenty readable so…

          • 2026-03-14 07:50:08 AM

            Arnaldo D'urso wrote:

            I was being ironic. I guess you didn’t get it. That’s probably why you don’t “get” Morrissey’s lyrics too. Let me be clear before you jump on my comment. I am not comparing my writing to Morrissey’s.

  • 2026-03-12 09:36:46 AM

    Mark Dawes wrote:

    Thanks for your review and contextual comments, Malachi. I don't personally have much motivation to listen to Morrissey, although when I was young I listened to everything The Smiths released and saw them live too. If I can chime in on the political commentary that has been a little contentious here in the comments... Morrissey was and still is a very influential character. Agree or disagree with what he says, but he has a facility for finding the bruised tissue in any argument and leaning his full weight on it. The Smiths era long predates the idea of toxic masculinity, but Morrissey exposed a lot of the hypocrisy around male behaviour - however he did it in such a way that opponents were sickened and enthusiasts were delighted. I think his very influential nature is an element of his fame, and his disdain for orthodoxy magnifies his fame. His willingness to allude to or espouse unpopular attitudes (especially now) brings even greater fame and notoriety. I think you highlight this honestly, Malachi, showing that being a huge fan needn't mean you must be uncritical. The passion aroused by Morrissey in his fans is visible here in the comments. In some ways I feel both Morrissey and John Lydon operate in similar ways - they both knowingly display genius and scorn simultaneously. I appreciate what both those artists have done, whether I like it all or listen to it all is another matter, and the outbursts and controversies tend to turn me off - I just ignore it. I know I'm certainly not as dedicated as Morrissey fans - after the second time Lee Scratch Perry didn't turn up, I gave up on my hopes of hearing him perform live...

    • 2026-03-12 11:28:55 PM

      Willie Luncheonette wrote:

      Yes, Johnny Lydon certainly was a terrific punk singer with just right touch of snarl, anger, fury and sarcasm. And the Pistols and Public Image are two of the very great bands. But his scorn for the Ramones, constantly slagging them off and claiming punk rock started in England with the Pistols, cuts him down to an itty bitty size

  • 2026-03-12 05:57:56 PM

    Mark wrote:

    Is the bunfight at the OK Corral over yet?

    Malachi's statistics holding true - Morrissey cancelled tonights's Valencia gig because he was in a 'catatonic state' after a bad night's sleep at his 'noisy' hotel. Sad old git!

    I saw The Smith's play live in Dublin in 1984 - His Nibs had the flowers sticking out of his back pocket and all that jazz. . It was a good gig if a bit vague as I was on acid. Sorry to let the side down but I have never bought a Morrissey solo album and never will.

    • 2026-03-12 08:52:35 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      the valencia cancellation was so hilarious. ‘circumstances render the show impossible’ is the excuse i’ll start using for anything i don’t show up for.

  • 2026-03-13 03:02:52 PM

    Georges wrote:

    Moz was a good fit with The Smiths, although their standout tracks (the singles; the idea of ​​an album never quite caught on) became progressively worse. Because, unsurprisingly, it was always the same formula. They seemed rather snobbish, didn't play very loudly (thank goodness for the ears), didn't talk much, and only played a handful of times on the continent (just twice in Paris in five years, in 1984!). Not a big show, they barely moved, and he wriggled awkwardly around. He was quite woke, seemed to be against their prime minister at the time, without delving too deeply into the subject. In that respect, it wasn't very disturbing. But it didn't bring anything new to the table. I once owned one of his records, a compilation of 45s on a double vinyl LP, which a friend bought from me. (He also gave me one of his live DVDs: OMG!) It was worse than J. Cope (and that's saying something!) or Brett Anderson, not even up to G. Friday's level. Perhaps it's closer to "Rep" Butler's albums?!

    • 2026-03-13 11:58:42 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      i strongly disagree that the smiths’ standout tracks—singles AND album cuts—got worse as they went on. ‘death of a disco dancer,’ ‘girlfriend in a coma,’ ‘last night i dreamt that somebody loved me,’ and ‘shoplifters of the world unite’ came out towards the end and are among their absolute best. i can agree that they weren’t as much of an ‘albums band’ as many other acts around that time but the queen is dead is basically a masterpiece.

      and yes, morrissey was very much against thatcher, and made that loud and clear in both his interviews and his lyricism. ‘margaret on the guillotine’ from his solo debut viva hate resulted in him being questioned for an hour by the UK government until they determined he wasn’t a tangible security threat.

      • 2026-03-14 01:24:34 PM

        Georges wrote:

        1. I quite like a few tracks from their early period, like 'Still Ill', 'Barbarism', 'How Soon', 'Hand in Glove' (especially by Sandie Shaw), and the sound of the BBC sessions or the Troy Tate demos.

        Or 'Some Girls etc' from their later period.

        The tracks you mentioned are a bit too mellow for me; I like rock.

        1. I've spent quite a few times in police custody, always for over an hour (wow, the rebel!). If they'd questioned me about my political views, they would have brought out the guillotine, and not in song, mind you. He's just criticizing traditional education, basically everything that worked. I don't really see what's so great about that?! Well, you're a huge fan. You'll never kill your idols.
  • 2026-03-15 02:48:00 PM

    Marc wrote:

    I think Notre-Dame is just rubbish. And it is great that „art“ is open to every body‘s own opinion🙂

  • 2026-03-17 07:42:22 PM

    Chelle Strand wrote:

    I wrote a deep dive literary analysis on this masterpiece.

    masterpiece.

    https://medium.com/@chellestrand/make-up-is-the-truth-6dd3260e766e