Acoustic Sounds
Lyra

Ray Charles

Modern Sounds in Country and Western Music

Music

Sound

Ray Charles "Modern Sounds in Country and Western Music"

Label: Tangerine Records

Produced By: Sid Feller

Engineered By: Frank Abbey, Gene Thompson, Bill Putnam, Bob Arnold, Johnny Cue

Mastered By: Michael Graves

Ray Charles’ ‘Modern Sounds in Country and Western Music’: Sorry, Stick With The Original

DYNAMIC COMPRESSION DOES NO FAVORS FOR THE GRAMMY HALL OF FAME-WINNING CLASSIC

As a record, Ray Charles’ Modern Sounds in Country and Western Music holds up just fine. But as an idea? It may be one of the most beautiful we ever had.

The story is a familiar one, as far the American musical mythos is concerned: Back in 1962, at the flashpoint of the civil rights movement, Charles recorded 12 standbys originally by Hank Williams (“You Win Again,” “Hey, Good Lookin’,”) Don Gibson (“I Can’t Stop Loving You”), and other luminaries of the tradition.

Six decades before Cowboy Carter launched a thousand thinkpieces — and won the golden gramophone for Album of the Year — Charles courageously demonstrated a self-evident truth: country music is Black music is country music.

Of course, Charles is one of the singers of all time, and he had three top-shelf arrangers on board: Gil Fuller and Gerald Wilson for the big band charts, and Marty Paich for the string orchestra. But for all these qualities, Modern Sounds in Country and Western Music can be a bit of a stodgy listen — a gilded lily.

All respect to Fuller, Wilson, and Paich — and Charles, who’s said to have closely guided them in the arrangement process. But the (over)use of call-and-response is a bit draining, as is the era’s omnipresent use of angel-choir backing vocals: we’re all here for Ray, but to get to him, we have to maneuver around a bit of clutter.

Despite all this: listening to an original vinyl pressing of Modern Sounds on Tracking Angle editor Michael Fremer’s elephantine system, I was surprised by how much closer I felt to Charles, as he sang these gorgeous ballads through his nose. He sounded tenderly human. In short, there was a real presence there — one missing from innumerable streams over the years.

Which brings us to this 2024 remaster on Charles’ label, Tangerine Records, with the blessing of his estate — released last September via vinyl, CD, and digital. Finally, I thought. A fresh version! A record that could use a leg up could finally get it. 

Instead, when I popped in the CD — the label didn’t send us vinyl, but you’d better believe it sounds like this too — I was severely disappointed. Plumped with excessive bass — with a similarly contrived top-end to the soundfield — everything in the middle seemed to coagulate. (Blame dynamic compression.) Charles was no longer running the show; he seemed lost in the sauce, on a record where he can scarcely afford to be.

I’m left with so many questions. It’s called Modern Sounds, right? So why does it sound less modern today? Doesn’t this work — of such historical import, not just musical — deserve a nuanced, clarifying touch? Why did the estate think this should fly? Is this how future generations should hear this? Who benefits from degrading it to the aural equivalent of a weekend at Grandma’s house?

The answer is nobody; we all lose. Grab an original pressing. Sorry, Ray. None of the 20th century’s preeminent musical figures deserve a rush job like this, least of all you.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: TRC22462

Channels: Stereo

Presentation: CD

Comments

  • 2025-02-11 11:04:59 PM

    PeterG wrote:

    Thanks for the recommendation on the original and your warning on the reissue. I share your loathing of compression and your suspicion that they trashed the vinyl as well as the CD. But there are plenty of reissues with CDs that suffer from compression much more than their vinyl counterparts. So maybe we don't really know?

    • 2025-02-12 01:04:00 AM

      bwb wrote:

      "the label didn’t send us vinyl, but you’d better believe it sounds like this too'

      First time I've read a review that trashes how a record sounds when the reviewer hasn't heard it. Too much to buy a copy for $26 and give it a listen?

      • 2025-02-12 06:58:48 PM

        Silk Dome Mid wrote:

        When I read that I did such an exaggerated double take that I hurt my neck. Lawsuit to follow.

      • 2025-02-12 09:39:06 PM

        Michael Fremer wrote:

        That was the reviewer's choice. The CD sound was truly awful and there was no reason to believe the record would sound better. I wouldn't waste money on it to find out.

      • 2025-02-13 12:43:55 AM

        Malachi Lui wrote:

        i'll agree with michael and morgan here. i wouldn't waste my money either, especially cos necessarily trashing the reissue would make even fewer people want to take an unwanted copy off my hands! (not that that's important, but still...) if anything, i'd assume that the vinyl would even sound slightly worse than the digital, considering how haphazard most LPs are these days. a bad digital master is gonna make a bad record, and i doubt they mastered separate batches of files for each format. if it sucks, it sucks. sure, cutting a file to a lacquer objectively adds coloration (whether or not you like it and whether or not you wanna admit that), but that will NEVER totally save a bad sounding digital master. it might change it in a way that you think is more pleasing, but it'll be a negligible difference for what the prices are these days.

        • 2025-02-13 11:50:40 PM

          Michael Fremer wrote:

          Some really interesting comments from John Atkinson and Joe Harley about vinyl sourced from digital in the interview section of Paul Seydor's Sasha Matson record review.

  • 2025-02-13 12:52:40 AM

    Lemon Curry wrote:

    Wait a sec..

    It's very often the case that for a release the CD is severely squashed but the vinyl is far more dynamic. It's the number 1 reason I chose vinyl over digital.

    It's sad indeed that the CD is a mess, but the vinyl is likely better. Original quality better? Maybe not.

  • 2025-02-13 01:16:01 PM

    Georges wrote:

    Here it is a space of freedom without the terrorism of moderators (like on SHF, ASR or Stereophile who exclude at all costs). And also free. Nobody even asks you to contribute as so often! So what would be great would be to respect the work that its many quality contributors offer us and to speak to them POLITELY. Thanks to the whole team!

  • 2025-02-13 04:44:59 PM

    AnalogJ wrote:

    Steve Hoffman did a reissue for early DCC on vinyl (before it was a noted audiophile label). Digitally mastered, it still sounds good.