Acoustic Sounds
Lyra

Blind Gary Davis

Harlem Street Singer

Music

Sound

Blind Gary Davis "Harlem Street Singer"

Label: Prestige/Bluesville

Produced By: Kenneth S. Goldstein

Engineered By: Rudy Van Gelder

Mixed By: Rudy Van Gelder

Lacquers Cut By: Matthew Lutthans

By: Michael Fremer

January 15th, 2025

Genre:

Folk

Format:

Vinyl

Rudy Van Gelder Records IN STEREO Gary Davis "One of the Last of a Long Line of Religious Street Singers" (REVISED REVIEW)

a stirring record that surely influenced more commercial folksters

The jacket is for a mono record so guess what? I played this record using a mono cartridge. Someone, (I thought in a comment but now I don't see it) claimed the recording was in stereo so upon returning from a trip to Seattle I played it using a stereo cartridge and? Yes, it's a fine stereo recording! Fine in that RVG kept it "natural", using stereo simply to produce space. Collapsing it to mono either with a mono cartridge or a "mono" summing switch seriously collapses the soundstage, hardens the voice and guitar and that's why it got the sound rating, which is now upped.

If you're expecting a primitive "field recording" you'll be disappointed by this influential set performed by the sixty four year old ordained minister and recorded by Rudy Van Gelder, August 24th, 1960 at his then year old Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey studio. Twenty numbers recorded in three hours, with the exception of one, all first takes. twelve of which are on this record.

The annotation by Larry Cohn suggests that "Pure Religion is "perhaps the most widely known of the songs here recorded", but within two years by far the best known song on this record would be "Samson and Delilah" better known as "If I Had My Way", and popularized by Peter, Paul & Mary on the group's eponymous debut album that reached #1 on the Billboard charts and remained there for a month. The annotation notes that years earlier the song was popularized by Blind Willie Johnson, who recorded it in 1927 but the credits on the PP&M album attribute the song to Davis.

Gary Davis's version is impassioned and bluntly delivered, with his guitar echoing his vocal lines as was the style, but on the tame side compared to PP&M's ferocious, almost scary high energy take, brilliantly recorded dry by the late Bill Schwartau who makes it sound as if microphones had been planted in the trio's mouths. Peter Yarrow's recent passing had me pulling this record from the "to listen" pile and putting it on top.

"Twelve Gates To the City" was another well known tune sung around that time at summer camps throughout the northeast. According to the annotation, Davis born in South Carolina in 1896, was a well-regarded blues guitarist before becoming an ordained minister in 1933. In 1935 he recorded "a series of remarkable recordings for the now defunct Perfect label", which brought him to the attention of the record buying public but he could more easily be heard singing on the streets of Harlem for free.

Twenty five years later he performed these songs at Van Gelder's. The annotation says Davis shared the concert stage with Pete Seeger and Woody Guthrie, probably in the 1940s. His two finger guitar work makes it sound as if three or more are on the strings.

It's a powerful performance and one Van Gelder captured well in STEREO though the jacket is for a mono record. A worthy addition to the Bluesville reissue series and one worth owning.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: CR00748

Pressing Plant: RTI

SPARS Code: AAA

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: original master tape

Presentation: Single LP

Comments

  • 2025-01-16 06:12:12 AM

    Willie Luncheonette wrote:

    I owned this album in the late 60's and I think it is terrific. Blind Willie Johnson, along with John Lee Hooker, is one of my two favorite blues singers although many would classify Willie as a religious singer. A fun thing to do (which I just did) is to listen to all 3 versions of "Samson and Delilah"- Johnson, Davis and Peter, Paul and Mary. See which version you prefer. Then you'll buy this album ASAP

    • 2025-01-18 12:15:24 PM

      db wrote:

      The nice thing about having a music subscription is that I can do as you suggested - listen to all three versions of the song. They are all so different. So different, in fact, that in casual listening I may not have even realized that the Peter, Paul and Mary version was the same song. Kinda like the Led Zeppelin version of Nobody's Fault But Mine. In any case, they're all god versions. And thanks for the suggestion.

  • 2025-01-16 02:51:46 PM

    bwb wrote:

    so what does it sound like? how is the performance? All I see in this review about this album is one song "is impassioned and bluntly delivered" and "It's a powerful performance and one Van Gelder captured well in mono." Is this supposed to be a review? It is a brief history and some interesting trivia but hardly anything about this recording or the music.

    Why an 8 for music and sound? Since most things reviewed here get a 10 or 11 even when the reviewer notes that the sound is not very good ("I gave it an 11 because it is the best version of a poor recording") should we assume that that this 8 is not very good?

    • 2025-01-16 08:00:27 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      so you complain about the site's sound and music "inflation" and then complain when a record doesn't get an inflated pair of ratings? How to rate sound on reissues of older material is tricky. If a poor recording to begin with gets a significantly upgraded sonic reissue, how else to reward the effort but give it a higher grade? I'm not sure. An "8" is a very good grade IMO. However, while this is an RVG recording I could produce a long list of better mono acoustic/folk/blues recordings so I chose an 8. I'm sure Joe Washek could have produced a more detailed review. I did the best I could with the time I had to write it. I think I communicated it well enough. You obviously think otherwise.

      • 2025-01-16 09:01:25 PM

        bwb wrote:

        How did you come up with that? I didn't say your ratings for this record were inflated, or not, and I have never complained about music inflation. That is a matter of taste. but sound is something we can more likely agree on.

        I do complain about the extremely limited value of sound ratings because there is absolutely no consistency. Your explanation that this is an 8 compared to other better recordings is the way it should be. An 11 should be a reference quality recording so an 8 is very good as you just stated. However, when crappy sounding records are awarded an 11 because they sound a bit better than every crappy sounding release of the same material that came before it, how can one interpret an 8 without an explanation? You justify an 11 for crap because it is better than previous crap of the same material, then justify an 8 for this because you judged it against recordings of different material. As I said, no consistency.

        Also, a competent reviewer should be able to divorce their emotions about the music from the sound, and not rate a record as an 10-11 for sound just because they love the music and they think the release sounds better than previous releases, when everyone seems to agree that some don't sound all that good and never will due to the limitations of the source material. Some Steely Dan UHQRs for example. ( I also complain about the poor text editing ability here)

        • 2025-01-19 07:31:39 PM

          Michael Fremer wrote:

          I came up with "that" from this: "Since most things reviewed here get a 10 or 11 even when the reviewer notes that the sound is not very good" and I disagree with it!

          • 2025-01-20 06:05:11 AM

            bwb wrote:

            My how did you come up with that referred to “ so you complain about the site's sound and music "inflation" and then complain when a record doesn't get an inflated pair of ratings?”

            Because

            1. I have never complained about music rating inflation
            2. I did not complain about this not getting inflated ratings

            So yeah, how did you come up with that?

            • 2025-01-20 06:16:27 AM

              bwb wrote:

              And asking “why an 8” is not complaining, it is just that, asking “why” you rated it that way, ,,, because on this site a rating without an explanation means very little

              • 2025-01-21 05:37:36 AM

                Silk Dome Mid wrote:

                Somebody fell off the wrong side of his high horse this morning.

                • 2025-01-21 06:16:31 AM

                  bwb wrote:

                  I don't think you should make snide remarks about him just because the ratings on his site are inconsistent. It is a difficult task when his reviewers have differing opinions about what the ratings mean.

                  • 2025-01-21 04:54:42 PM

                    Silk Dome Mid wrote:

                    Ha ha ha...I think you realize that I was talking about YOU, Mr. High Horse. Ratings are always subjective, and must be interpreted by the well-informed reader.

      • 2025-01-16 10:44:41 PM

        Come on wrote:

        My suggestion for sound quality ratings would be to add a rating scale for something like „reissue effort“.

        We then had „sound“ for absolute sound quality“ and „reissue effort“ for appreciating if it’s the best or not of all the mediocre sounding releases of a recording.

        Unless we have this, it frequently happens what both of you discuss ;-).

        I’m still thinking about a second „music“ rating which could differentiate a 10 or 11 for a nice Swedish choir Christmas album from Coltrane’s Blue Train, but it’s complicated ;-)

        • 2025-01-18 11:52:36 PM

          Sloan Lamb wrote:

          Frankly, this review was terrific and interesting, I learned a lot. In terms of subjectivity of sound quality, it may be best to just listen to the album on Spotify or Qobuz. Yes, it will be somewhat different but will still provide a very close facsimile to judge for oneself.

        • 2025-01-18 11:52:38 PM

          Sloan Lamb wrote:

          Frankly, this review was terrific and interesting, I learned a lot. In terms of subjectivity of sound quality, it may be best to just listen to the album on Spotify or Qobuz. Yes, it will be somewhat different but will still provide a very close facsimile to judge for oneself.