ZZ Top-Tres Hombres-45 RPM Vinyl Record
Lyra

ZZ Tops

Tres Hombres

Music

Sound

ZZ Top Tres Hombres UHQR

Label: Warner Music/Analogue Productions

Produced By: Bill Ham

Engineered By: Robin Brians

Mixed By: Terry Manning

Lacquers Cut By: Matthew Lutthans

Texas Boogie Classic Gets Zee Double 45 UHQR Treatment—Limited to 5000 Copies

it is the zz tops?

ZZ Top's third, released July, 1973 was the group's breakthrough set, peaking at #8 on the crowded Billboard Top 200. "Boogie-Rock", flavored with Southern Memphisonian (is there such a word?) blues charm produced a unique blend of pulsating rhythmic drive and country charm . Perhaps that's why all these years later the album continues to find new audiences wanting to both "boogie down" and draw close to the southern ether. It's not the kind of record in need of analysis beyond that, though there's been plenty trying to understand its broad, ongoing appeal.

Tres Hombres has had tres relatively recent reissues and quatro over the last two decades if you count the 2006 Because Sound Matters Warner Brothers release, mastered at AcousTech Mastering by Kevin Gray and Steve Hoffman and pressed at RTI. That one has a median Discogs price of $55 and a high of $135.20, bought by someone who was. The last copy sold was April 19th of this year. Discogs lists 735 releases, with more than 200 on vinyl! Now that's a popular record!

The other recent ones were the VMP and the Rhino High Fidelity, part of the ZZ Top sold out box set but also available individually. The VMP was cut by Ryan Smith at Sterling Sound and pressed oh "hot sauce" red vinyl at GZ Media. Kevin Gray cut the Rhino box version.

Of the aforementioned tres, the Gray/Hoffman sounds closer to this new UHQR than do the others, and that includes the Rhino Gray cut years later that sounds very different. The G/H cut has some bass "whomp", the RKS has the most neutral balance with a bit of warmth and for some reason the Rhino cut is surprisingly bright and antiseptic—almost as if the idea was to give listeners a document. Maybe that was the goal, but you can't turn it up or it gets bright.

And now we have the "ultimate" Tres Hombres cut by Matthew Lutthans from the original analog tapes on The Mastering Lab cutting system and pressed at 45rpm on two Clarity Vinyl UHQR flat discs. You know the process.

I wonder what confirmed audiophile Billy Gibbons would think listening to the quad four listed above, all of which sound different from one another. Which would he think correct? If there even is such a thing.

This new UHQR definitely pushes the mid-bottom end, which adds some warmth almost to the point of making the kick drum the star of the show. Matthew Lutthans is quoted in the annotation: "I tried to cut it so you can play it loudly, and not want to turn it down. Our version leans a little more towards the warm side than some others but not horribly so".

He ain't kidding! The louder you crank it, the better it sounds, but how it sounds will definitely be system dependent. If you like your Tres Hombres loud, this is the one you can turn up. Way up. The louder you play it, the better it sounds.

For people who complain about having to get up and turn over 45rpm double LP sets, that won't be a problem here. Once "Waitin' For the Bus"begins you're not likely to be sitting down until "Have You Heard?" ends!

Music Specifications

Catalog No: UHQR 0023-45

Pressing Plant: QRP

SPARS Code: AAA

Speed/RPM: 45

Weight: 200 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: Original Master Tapes

Presentation: Box Set

Comments

  • 2026-04-25 11:12:43 AM

    Silk Dome Mid wrote:

    It seems like this should have a higher music rating than 8, but that's fine. What a fun album! I saw them on tour back then and they were a breath of fresh air, unpretentious blues rock with great guitar playing and a sense of humor. Remember when they released a ZZ Top collection on CD with the drums re-recorded and terrible, boomy sound? That was a true travesty!

  • 2026-04-25 12:13:29 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Wow this time you used the rating scale. I'd give it a 10, as the music not just grooves, it's also an album with a lot of great tracks.

    Having the Rhino, the VMP and the SH/KG in the two pressing variants, I generally agree with your differentiations in sound quality. The Rhino and VMP have clearer transients and more presence focus while the SH/KG is rather bass focused. The former two as you said have their limits when played loud (which is the basic demand of this record) while the SH/KG release is just pure fun then. I ordered (but not received yet) the UHQR, as I expected a similar meaningful focus as the SH/KG with possibly even better bass and maybe the transients and detail improvement of the others, without being less suited for loud levels. I didn’t read that much from your description of the UHQR in comparison than the mid bass thing, but I’m still full of hope. I’d have rated the SH/KG at at least 9. Certainly not really audiophile sounding in the typical characteristics but very good with a quite perfect balance for the purpose of the music.

    Bass whomp or not? As for some SH/KG jazz releases, you assumed a bass whomp for their ZZ Top (and yes, the bass is really strong, yet perfectly under control). In both cases (for the jazz releases some time ago and for the ZZ Top just recently) SH wrote the opposite in his forum (see the actual quote down below). As any of the 4 mastering engineers usually said or would say (not only for this recording), their (mostly very different sounding) cuts are flat, we now have the alternative truth options of ¾ of them lying or tonality differences instead depending on the involved mastering gear or monitoring equipment. It seems we shouldn't jump to conclusions about mastering choices without the feedback of those engineers, but just relate differences to what we hear on our setups. Certainly we also all think of our (very different sounding and here and there changing) setups as being more or less neutral. ;-)

    Quote of SH regarding Tres Hombres SH/KG cut: “Flat transfer. Chad liked it, even though we tried it with bass reduction and midband boost. He said he wanted one version out there in the world that wasn’t f****d with. The flat master tape cut is the version he picked. Sounds awesome on some systems.“

    If that's true, then from what you wrote, the UHQR is either EQ'ed in the mid bass or again the differences lie in the used gear only and all 4 releases are cut flat.

    • 2026-04-25 12:29:26 PM

      Come on wrote:

      Forgot to mention:

      if you just spoke of what you heard (not where a whomp comes from), then I fully agree. What seems to have been on the tape indeed sounds not completely neutral, but it fits to the music and probably would have been mixed live in the same way.

    • 2026-04-25 12:46:37 PM

      Come on wrote:

      If I combine my positive impression of the old SH/KG release with your UHQR review (similar bass focus, definitive version), then I'd rate the UHQR 10/10 at least. Based on what I'm used to from the UHQR's, I think I won't be dissappointed. I love to crank up this album!

    • 2026-04-25 01:13:04 PM

      Silk Dome Mid wrote:

      Over the years I have noticed that the bass-treble balance in different versions of the same recording often depends on the system used for mastering. especially the speakers. If the speakers have a lot of bass, the result sounds thin. If they are bass-shy, the result is bass bloat. This even happens when a couple of different systems are consulted during mastering, as the engineer always has a "preferred" system. I friend of mine has a killer studio with some classic, expensive JBL speakers built into the walls. The sound is exquisite, with a ton of bass. All of his releases have weak, tinny bass on every other system, no matter how good.

      • 2026-04-25 01:35:26 PM

        Come on wrote:

        Correct, this happens, when non-neutral monitoring gear is compensated with EQ. But when all engineers claim they cut flat and their versions anyway sound completely different on the same setup, then their mastering gear must produce very different sound on the media. We know from single mastering setups that changed, how different the outcome of the same mastering style and EQ can sound. Think of how different an all tube cutting setup can sound from an all solid state cutting setup, even if either cuts are done flat.

        • 2026-04-25 02:47:21 PM

          Silk Dome Mid wrote:

          Absolutely.

  • 2026-04-25 02:04:31 PM

    Phil Barton wrote:

    Alas on a work trip, but mine was delivered yesterday. I have a Bell Sound London promo original that is the best -sounding Tres Hombres I've heard. I can't wait to compare the two.

  • 2026-04-25 06:50:44 PM

    Rob wrote:

    You didn’t compare this to an OG London? I have a bell sound s/f that sounds incredible. Lots of energy. I know bell sound took some liberties with the tapes they were given, but this is the version to beat. Also have a sterling press with loads of bass that is a close second to the bell sound.

    • 2026-04-25 08:24:59 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      I don't have a Bell Sound. However, they are usually great, SF was an excellent mastering engineer, the tapes were fresh and their cutting system unique. But I didn't have one of those. So we'll rely on our readers....

      • 2026-04-28 02:08:23 AM

        Sam Casanzio wrote:

        I don’t have the new UHQR, but I do have a NM original blue label SF (Sam Feldman) and the Steve Hoffman pressing. I like a lot of Steve’s mastering work, but not on Tres Hombres. The SF original has clarity and well-balanced bass. Play as loud as you want and be swept away with punch and drive that he Hoffman remaster can’t match. Steve’s remastering comes across as bloated and bass heavy, removing some of the air and sparkle. I suppose, as is the case most times, it an be very system dependent. I’m sure on some systems, Steve’s remastering is just the ticket. As for the UHQR, I can’t say other than you believe it to be close sonically to Hoffman/Gray. Can someone please compare the UHQR to an original?

        • 2026-05-06 06:28:28 AM

          Come on wrote:

          “Steve’s remastering comes across as bloated and bass heavy, removing some of the air and sparkle.”

          ————————

          Yes, coming from what’s neutral, this is also absolutely what I hear. Only an extremely bass controlled setup can still play it sufficiently controlled in bass so that it still can be more fun than the others when played loud. Still sparkle and air is lacking.

          The Rhino unfortunately goes in the opposite direction and is somehow bright in upper mids when played loud and the VMP is the most neutral of them. I count on the UHQR as bettering all of them in every aspect. Unfortunately I don’t have an OG. Perhaps the VMP so far is closest to it.

  • 2026-04-28 10:13:54 AM

    Paul Robertson wrote:

    I’ve been curious about this one, so it was great to see that the Master himself decided to review it. I love the UHQR’s I already have and can’t see them being bested to be honest. Tres Hombres is a killer album for me so I needed to know MF’s thoughts. My problem out of the gate learning about this release is that my CDN OG is a demo disc for me personally. It is ridiculously good. Great slam through a deep bottom end with a huge soundstage providing a warm but totally transparent top end…….so truthfully I was not seriously considering this particular UHQR. I think this review confirms my decision of standing pat is the right one.

    I have a sickness and it’s refreshing to not experience FOMO…….for once at least 😉

  • 2026-05-01 03:03:23 PM

    Wyatt Foley wrote:

    This UHQR of Tres Hombres is a definitive sonic masterpiece and a perfect case study for why the physical signal path still reigns supreme. When you have a unique recording that possesses this level of atmospheric fire, it deserves to be heard without being capped and contained into a DSD file. The difference is clear: by letting the full wave expand through the AAA chain, we’re finally hearing the expansive, uninterrupted depth of the original master tape. This isn't just a reissue; it’s a liberation of the living signal. Exceptional work by Matthew Lutthans at The Mastering Lab and the team at QRP for keeping the signal path open.