Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

Walt Dickerson

To My Queen

Music

Sound

Walt Dickerson To My Queen

Label: New Jazz

Produced By: Esmond Edwards

Engineered By: Rudy Van Gelder

By: Brian Fisher

January 22nd, 2026

Format:

Vinyl

The Electric Recording Co. Presses a Masterpiece- No Offense Intended!

A true all tube, monaural cut of a deeply moody and romantic album

There are certain words that trigger an immediate snarky response the instant they are uttered. Rolex. Mercedes. The list writes itself. Yet, at the root of the reaction is often one commonality: Money. In our current world, consumerism has become fully globalized. You can get just about anything you want when you want it. But there have been certain companies that simply won’t change their production, or their quality to meet market demand. Rolex comes to mind here. The result becomes waitlists, screening tactics and an increasingly agitated public. Who needs a Rolex anyway? My phone tells me the time. And who, may I ask, needs more than one? So, to many, the Rolex owner becomes a douche bag. And so it goes for many of the great old brands. What starts as a no-compromises product grows into a classic, and then the world has its way and gives birth to hype. And not every great product stays great- most don’t, in fact- even as the marketing (and pricing) machine continues to turn. It’s simply too easy to compromise quality and let the money flow.

But this is a record review, isn’t it?! You are correct, and it’s a review of a sold out, very pricey release that is basically unattainable unless you are willing to mine the secondary market for gold. And gold is practically what it will take in that space. Wow, just what the world needs right now! So, why even bother to take time and write these universally triggering sentences? For the algorithm, of course. I jest. My true motivation is to simply acknowledge how I often feel- and it’s certainly not just me- when I come across products like those made by The Electric Co. As soon as you mention the company, a common response may sound something like, “You spent $300 on a record?! How did you even get it? How could this sound better than an original pressing? You’ve changed, man!” No fun at all, I can assure you.

My good friend Ethan has an eclectic record collection that most would die to call their own. One night after a few drinks and many records, I realized that he had a section of his records dedicated to New Jazz. I remember him saying that he was into New Jazz, but I simply heard “new jazz”. I immediately made an internal judgment that sounded a little like, “Does that come with a linen shirt and a coke habit?” Shame on me for misunderstanding. And, funnily, I already had several titles in my collection without even making the connection. Yes, New Jazz was the "budget" arm of Prestige that debuted in 1958. If you love hard bop and soul jazz, you probably have a bunch of their fantastic titles. But what I noticed immediately, during a night that immediately turned into a nearly exclusive New Jazz listening session, was that the label featured supremely melodic players often with avant garde leanings. Mal Waldron, Jackie McClean, and the subject of today’s writing, Walt Dickerson.The top of the pile for that night was Dickerson’s To My Queen. Even the cover is evocative, and its mission statement is all contained in the title: This is a record for Mrs. Dickerson. She’s the “queen” on the cover…

Ok, so you hear an album and it fully obsesses you. And you are a record collector. So, what do you do? You, of course, immediately find yourself with a drink in one hand and Discogs in the other. You can either get an $250 original pressing (probably with their famous recycled vinyl), an early 80s Japanese stereo copy,  or a $900 secondary market Electric Recording Co. copy. Fuck that. I got the Japanese copy. It wasn’t the original mono copy but man it sounded like God. A new favorite record. 

But then I had the pleasure of visiting one Michael Fremer. And wouldn’t you know that a gleaming To My Queen from Electric Recording Co. was leaning right up against a giant stack of records next to his listening chair. “Hey, Michael, any chance we could throw this on!” And as I said the words, I knew I had made a mistake. Michael would not give me this record. That was for sure. And, I couldn’t afford to buy it second hand, so why bother torturing myself? Like all their records, it was out of print almost immediately. So, I mentally switched gears. I was prepared to hate it and, like so many others, unleash my bile on this label that would dare to have such an “exclusive” business model. Oh, the nerve…

But, that didn’t happen. On Fremer’s gargantuan Wilson speakers, the mono image stood as tall and wide as a skyscraper and it seemed to float, but it also contained such a heavy solidity at the same time. Fat and light- now that’s a party trick. It sonically shone like a gem. And that’s no exaggeration. Of course, there is the question of Michael’s system. But I’ve heard plenty of crappy sounding records at his house. His system, like any other, can’t make diamonds out of coal. So, I thought I had to at least reach out to Philip Vernol at ERC for a review copy to hear on my system. Fully expecting silence after hitting “send”, I was quite surprised to see a warm reply the next day with a tracking number. Wow, we were off to the races.

Some people look at records like fetishistic objects. And I guess it's easy to view them that way, especially if you don’t own any. They are an ancient medium; they are expensive; they can be quite exotic and, yes, they can be beautiful simply as objects. But, in general, that’s not really how I view them. I care about sound. And if the best sounding copy has a ring-worn cover or a stain, I’ll gladly add it to my collection. So, it was fairly amusing to feel a giant grin spreading across my face as I unwrapped the record that shipped (next day air from London) in a giant cardboard sandwich. This was no PB&J, either. It was a solid double club sandwich that was so rigid and fat that warps were simply not possible. Ok, so that was impressive, as warps are the enemy of my Kuzma arm featuring the impeccable, but choosy, Colossus headshell. The deep gloss of the cover, the letter-pressed artwork and even the characteristic “purple” shade chosen from the palette of purples that New Jazz has unintentionally enticed fans with for decades- this pressing has it all. Ok, so there was no “deep cut” on the label, but we’ll excuse that. Another fun aspect of this particular record was the all tube chain mono cutting system and the finished product that it yields. The grooves are so tight and even that it almost looks like there are no grooves at all. It was an impeccable specimen presented gorgeously. I guess that’s the level of quality that one should expect from such an expensive, limited release. I can say with confidence that, in this case, you truly do get what you pay for. 

All reviewers have their own style. Don’t tell anyone, but I generally skip all the sentences that opine about snares that “crack with authority” or bass lines that “speak with a voice that displays both depth and clarity”. I’d rather hear a quick overall impression because that’s how impressions work for me. I generally listen to the first few minutes of an album and I know exactly how I feel about the sound. Of course, after hearing the whole album, you do sometimes notice inconsistencies between tracks. And I note them. After much research you can often even discover reasons for these discrepancies. Maybe the album wasn’t all recorded at the same studio. Maybe different engineers were responsible for different tracks. Maybe there was damage to the tape, etc… Yet, none of that is happening here.

Luckily, Ethan lent me his original New Jazz pressing; I had my Japanese stereo copy, and I now had the Electric Recording Co. version. I ultrasonically cleaned all 3 and sat down for impressions. If you just heard one of these records, you’d fall in love with the sound (and most surely) the music. The star of the show is Walt Dickerson’s vibes playing, of course (though Andrew Hill just might be a tie). And the presentation of his instrument was fantastic on all of these versions. Yet, there was more noise on the original pressing and the drums and bass both seemed to have been limited. We could talk about the reasons for this, but it would be conjecture. The Japanese pressing was silent and dynamic. It contained much of the magic that the Electric Recording Co. version displays with such ease. But it’s stereo, and this is an album that, to me, is best enjoyed in the original mono. If you are looking for a reasonable copy that sounds incredible, I’d seek out one of the Japanese pressings for sure. But the ERC version is simply special. You can wipe your mind of all thoughts of packaging and presentation and just listen and you’ll agree. My copy was dead flat, dead silent and stunningly dynamic. I’ve heard many mono recordings that felt like you were simply listening into a narrow but deep sonic passage. They certainly feel “authentic” but I always miss the stereo. I know them’s fighting words, but it has often been my experience. So, the party trick here is the width and the dynamics of the image thrown by this version of To My Queen. You realize AFTER listening that it was mono. And then you immediately wonder why all monaural recordings don’t sound this good. Is it the fact that Electric Recording Co. doesn’t remaster? Is it because they choose recording where the tape is in incredible condition? Is it because of their obsessive vintage cutting system using a monaural cutter head? It’s probably all of the above, and frankly I don’t care. 

Why do you seek out one of their recordings? You passionately love the featured album like your favorite movie. I watch "After Hours" at least 2 times a year and have since it came out in the mid 80’s. If I could watch it on film each time, I certainly would. And that’s what the Electric Recording Co. does. If you have enough money to buy them all, do it. You probably didn’t feel the lost cash anyway. And you’ll be supporting a no-expenses barred venture. If you feel your purchases, and most of us truly do, I still can see a world where I pick up a few of my treasured albums from their catalog. Most of us don’t listen to our entire collections. We listen to our lifelong friends, our gems, more regularly. If all my gems were from Electric Recording Co, I’d be living my best musical life. Bravo. 

Music Specifications

Catalog No: ERC115, New Jazz – 8283

Pressing Plant: Record Industry

SPARS Code: AAA

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 180 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Mono

Source: original master tapes

Presentation: Single LP

Comments

  • 2026-01-22 12:44:59 PM

    Todd Fredericks wrote:

    Thanks for the review! I'm sure this sounds incredible.

    I'm just curious.

    Why do they charge so much? I get it they do a limited run and it does sell out so there's a big demand. But why the high price tag?

    I also know they have their own press and everything is top shelf but why so much more than other operations like Analogue Productions? How many times more is one of their limited releases compared to an AP UHQR which is not as limited (but still limited).

    Again, I'm just curious. I know they sell out and their releases are supposed to be stellar.

    I would love to hear one of their releases one day but for me the cost would be too high.

    • 2026-01-22 01:35:58 PM

      Brian Fisher wrote:

      Who am I to speak for them, but I'll give it a shot ; ) Limited releases cost more because big batches have more profit. Big batches often have more issues with quality control. Also, small batches create a sense of urgency and make products seem more special. They create collector's markets. I'm fine with all that. And, these releases are special. I'll add that you price according to what people will pay. Why wouldn't you? This isn't a release for everyone. It's for people who have systems that can resolve what they put out. Those are often quite expensive. I doubt these guys are getting rich on these releases, but I hope they are. So that's just my take.

    • 2026-01-23 04:44:25 AM

      Robert Nakata wrote:

      Another part of the high cost of ERC releases is the print and assemblage of the record covers. Efforts to track down original photography, original (or close-to) paper stock and original, metal typesetting is executed in the same spirit as the vinyl manufacturing. While not the main point of the music, it adds a lustre which can only be fully appreciated by holding a copy.

      • 2026-01-23 05:50:41 AM

        Come on wrote:

        The following link is the perfect counterexample (at less than a tenth of the price), or any luxury Impex or AP release (at less than a fifth or the price):

        https://trackingangle.com/music/new-reissue-label-gammaut-sets-a-higher-packaging-standard-bar

        IMO all the arguments mentioned by ERC price apologists have counter examples, and as far as I can judge including those mentioning the "Lyrec tube mastering chain", where I doubt its superiority or higher price level compared to what Kevin Gray or Bernie Grundman developed over the years. For a comparison of results just hear Kevin Gray's pure tube mastering releases for a tenth of the price!

        I don't doubt there are fantasic sounding ERC releases (although I doubt that the "no mastering touches approach, only flat transfers" makes all releases sound right at home or superior) and for sure I would be able to hear and appreaciate differences.. For me that price level for a new vinyl product, without any comprehensible justification and a lot of competition, is not acceptable, especially considering paying between 1/10th to 1/5th for any other record of this quality added to a large collection.

  • 2026-01-22 01:37:03 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Listened to it on the web, really nice music! Congrats to the review copy! Would buy one as soon as Chad or someone releases it. I spend more silly money on other possibly more silly things but even for one of my very favorite records (Lateef/Eastern Sounds) I couldn't decide for spending the up to 600$ including tax/shipping for one record. Unfortunately their concept works.

    The comparison with luxury products like Rolex is somehow correct - maybe not even regarding the equivalent value but regarding the unrelated cost and production background. Enough want it, nobody needs it, the effort to produce it is not more expensive and it doesn't run better than a cheaper watch. There are just enough who buy it anyway.

    For me not buying ERC is rather a principle than comprehensible, given other similar expeditures, but they went overboard and as an addon, surrounding conditions are simply too bad outside the UK.

    • 2026-01-22 01:50:44 PM

      Brian Fisher wrote:

      Yup. Who is wrong to be offended by an expensive item that "should" be cheaper? I get it. Buy what you love. No one needs this shit. But, man, what a sound...

      • 2026-01-22 03:09:27 PM

        Come on wrote:

        I have yet to be convinced of "what a sound" (compared to others). I just heard the ERC Rollins Way out west stereo and didn't find it superior. Admittedly an album that has numerous other high quality AAA releases starting at different AP (tube and solid state remastered), Grundman and KG Craft AAA up to the UHQR. I didn't find the ERC convincingly better (but different, similar as the Doug Sax releases are different in audible tube cut advantages as well as disadvantages). But maybe this is a special case. It's just too expensive for a hit or miss risk. It may be worth it for a release that was and never will be reissued normal priced by the other best engineers on the best other mastering chains. Would be interested in your comparisons of some albums with other AAA HQ releases. So far all ERC reviewers seem to avoid detailled comparisons with other pressings, although many ERC have several AAA equivalents mastered by KG, Grundman and others and probably all reviewers would have access to those for a comparison.

        • 2026-01-22 08:26:33 PM

          Brian Fisher wrote:

          I fully see this. To me, if it’s the best available and you can swing it, that’s what you get. For this record, it was so much better than what was available that it makes pure sense.

  • 2026-01-22 04:35:21 PM

    Jeffrey C. Robbins wrote:

    Brian, I see three stereo Japan reissues: 1965, 1980 and 1992. What would estimate is the version that comes closest to the ERC? Thanks. JCR

    • 2026-01-22 08:27:54 PM

      Brian Fisher wrote:

      The stereo one from 1980 is my other copy. It’s purely incredible. Snag one.

  • 2026-01-22 11:17:04 PM

    Todd wrote:

    Fun review. Your enthusiasm comes through for sure. I’m starting to realize that most vinyl reviews are flexes. “I have this and you don’t.” “Here is a great release, but the OG is better and you probably can’t get it.” Again, the review was cool and the writing is great. I just don’t give a shit whether I get to hear it or not.

    • 2026-01-23 06:17:35 AM

      Brian Fisher wrote:

      I so appreciate that. That attitude is exactly the opposite of how I feel. And, at the end of the day, they are just records. If you are flexing with plastic, you were denied hugs from your parents ; )

  • 2026-01-23 07:21:53 AM

    Todd wrote:

    Haha!