Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

The Stooges

Fun House

Music

Sound

The Stooges Fun House Rhino High Fidelity

Label: Elektra/Rhino High Fidelity

Produced By: Don Gallucci

Engineered By: Brian Ross-Myring

Mixed By: Brian Ross-Myring

Mastered By: Kevin Gray at Cohearent Audio

Lacquers Cut By: Kevin Gray at Cohearent Audio

By: Michael Fremer

March 13th, 2026

Format:

Vinyl

The Stooges' "Fun House" à la Rhino High Fidelity

compared to what?

If you'd told me my original Artisan Sound mastered Pitman pressing was up on Discogs for around $700, I'd not believe you until I looked to confirm. But it is. Not that anyone will ever buy it for such a price, but still! After listening to the new KG mastered Rhino High Fidelity reissue, I have to ask "why"? Why would you pay that much for a record that sounds distant and from the wide open spaces when you could have this for $40 bucks and with Iggy's droll informative annotation? Actually, there is a reason, but it's not sufficiently compelling unless having the original artyfact is your goal.

You'd know from listening back in 1970 that these guys were well-prepped and ready for the studio when they first entered Elektra's posh La Cienega Boulevard recording venue built by audiophile and label founder Jac Holzman. Iggy's droll annotation confirms that and that he was tripping the entire time, which makes his performances that much more impressive.

Fun House has always sounded recorded "live in the studio" and it was, with a nice amount of microphone leakage obvious in the wide open spaces and that's a plus for hearing a well-oiled band performing live in the studio. Confirmation supplied by Henry Rollins in his notes for the big complete Fun House box set. Rollins' notes also confirm that these weren't "one-off" takes. Instead, the rock classic is the result of "...a punishing regimen of repetition". Yet the whole thing was completed in a two week span to 8 tracks. The producer, Don Gallucci notes that "..it was mixed almost when it was first taken down...".

That big box, which let me tell you I purchased like all of the other fans (and the money creeps who buy these limited editions as "financial instrument" investments), is a fitting monument to a rock record Mount Rushmore, musically and sonically.

In his postscript notes Rollins writes about Bill Inglot arriving with the master tapes then hearing the master tape playback and watching Bernie Grundman cut lacquers at 45rpm for the 3 sided box set version. Rollins was "...struck by how much more was happening in the midrange and that the snare drum had a dynamic (he) had never heard before". And how they started the process by referencing a first pressing.

So I'll get to the point: the absolute best sounding version of this iconic record is that 45rpm Bernie Grundman mastered record. Not even close. It has the "wide open spaces" of the original, Artisan mastering, but with added weight on bottom and far greater dynamic "oomph". What stood out most on that cut is Dave Alexander's bass lines. You can feel his fingers touching the strings unlike on any other version. That's among other great aspects of the original mix best revealed on the double 45rpm pressing.

Malachi and I spent some time comparing various Fun House editions previous to this Rhino High Fidelity release, and the young and old ears agreed that among those (and maybe I'm even missing one I can't remember I have), the Bernie box cut rules!

This new Kevin Gray cut has an inexplicably narrower and flatter soundstage and has an overall densely packed, somewhat congealed sound. Iggy's voice doesn't get as much room in the middle on Kevin's mastering. I don't know what causes that or why this version sounds so fundamentally different compared to the original and BG cuts—it doesn't sound like dynamic compression.

I also have an ERC (Electric Recording Company) edition. ERC cuts what's on the tape—no mastering—and while its all tube system gives the sound a warmer, fuller glow, and loses some of the edge, it too has the width and space found on the original and 45rpm box set cuts.

Still, in that shoot out, I think most rock fans would prefer this new Rhino cut for its edge, but be sure to never hear the box set version! No rock library is complete without a copy of Fun House. It's limited here to 5000 copies so don't miss out. However, if those 45rpm BG metal parts exist, the smart money says release that version.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: RHF1 74071

Pressing Plant: Optimal

SPARS Code: AAA

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 180 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Presentation: Single LP

Comments

  • 2026-03-13 07:46:08 PM

    MrRom92 wrote:

    And therein lies my issue with the ”Rhino HiFi” series. There is effort in making releases that are at least decent and affordable, but it doesn’t really live up to the promise of high fidelity when there is always some pre-existing release that is even higher fidelity, and no attempt made to match or exceed that. The records should really be called “Rhino So-So”

    At least there will be overlap with Chad’s promising 45 series, and perhaps their own R2R series (if they manage to release more than 2 albums on tape a year)

    • 2026-03-13 08:24:14 PM

      Come on wrote:

      What seems to be valid for this release isn’t fore others. I think there’s no general rule with Rhino releases. The Fleetwood Mac s/t (especially the one with the 7“ 45RPM added) was exceptional as well as the Coltrane mono box set, which contains several best sounding versions of those records. Both were KG cuts as far as I remember. I must also emphasize that I got 3 times fantastic replacement service from them (covers), two of them, in particular, were very accommodating!

  • 2026-03-13 08:42:56 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Good to read about an ERC comparison for once (the first maybe, if I didn’t miss one). The part of the seemingly usual characteristics „warm and losing some edge“ is elsewhere described even more extreme and is another main reason, keeping me from buying any release (unlike those of Kevin Gray‘s tube mastering chain).

    It’s a shame that mastering engineers always have to keep quiet when it comes to providing background information on sources and other reasons for differences in sound; otherwise it would be very interesting to hear from Kevin Gray how the modest sound of this release came about.

  • 2026-03-13 09:27:09 PM

    Nicholas Paredes wrote:

    I have both the ERC and the Rhino versions. I’ve not done a direct comparison, and should for fun. I preferred the ERC. Maybe not a $600 preference, but still. I enjoyed hearing the room, the space, It also had a more raw feel to me with the ambience coming through the recording. Maybe one day I’ll get to hear the 45s.

    • 2026-03-13 10:50:55 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      The ERC correctly gets the space and it gives Iggy room to wail…

  • 2026-03-14 06:35:15 AM

    PeterPani wrote:

    My HiFi is 50’s tube based. I love tonal colour and I love to hear the space between the vocals and instruments. For loud music I go to live venues. So, I am very happy with my ERC-cut.

    • 2026-03-14 08:04:49 PM

      Andrew Curtis wrote:

      I love my ERC too. It's sublime.

  • 2026-03-15 01:06:45 AM

    Mark wrote:

    Asking for a friend - what is the meaning of 'Ala' in the article's title? Perchance are we talking about 'à la'?

    • 2026-03-15 01:37:07 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      we are. I will ficks.

  • 2026-03-16 01:36:56 PM

    Azmoon wrote:

    A 10 for music? What a joke.

    The bar must be pretty low now.

    • 2026-03-17 09:07:43 AM

      Mark wrote:

      One can tell from your detailed and analytical précis that you think 10 (Thank God MF did not give it an 11 or you would have burst a blood vessel...) is overly generous. On the Azmoonometer what are we showing? We await enlightenment.

    • 2026-03-24 10:27:55 AM

      directdriver wrote:

      What a joke. It's too low. Automatic 11!

  • 2026-03-16 09:17:33 PM

    Lemon Curry wrote:

    Until recently, I had not heard this album before. I was more into the Rock/Pop thing back then, and I would never have listened to Fun House for more than 5 minutes before dismissing it. So I have a certain advantage - it's all new to me.

    Before I read Iggy's liner notes, I dropped the stylus on side 1 and just listened. My first reaction, and the one I want to comment on, is that I instantly knew he was singing into an SM57 stage mic. The middle bloom and rolloff on the top and bottom to prevent feedback. I KNOW that sound. What I heard overall was what I think of as the standard KG sound signature. Nice soundstage, that elsewhere sometimes comes at the expense of the middle. (His Buckingham-Nicks was really middle-deficient on my system, compared to what was happening on the wings). But on Fun House, and especially after reading the liner notes, I felt like I was getting, dare I say, original intent. The stage mic sound of Iggy that he wanted when he pushed away the condenser mic. I'll probably never hear the BG (maybe you could post a sample?), but I loved the ride and the ethos of the RHF. When you crank this thing, it IS a stage performance in every sonic way.

    I loved every bit of it.

  • 2026-03-24 10:12:09 AM

    directdriver wrote:

    For me, the music rating should be an automatic 11 as it's my favorite rock record and, I believe, one of the greatest rock records ever recorded. Mount Rushmore level. I also love the way it's recorded.