Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra
First Original Source Series 2026
By: Michael Johnson

December 31st, 2025

Category:

Discography

'Original Source' 2025 Wrap Up: Part I

A deep dive into the final 4 AAA Deutsche Grammophon titles of 2025

It’s been a while since I reviewed what Deutsche Grammophon and Emil Berliner were up to with their Original Source series. I’m happy to report that not only is their program still going strong, but they have also dipped into the catalog of their subsidiary Archiv Produktion, which is something I’m very excited about. This fall we saw four new releases from the acclaimed series, and before we get ready for all the titles that 2026 will bring, I thought I would recap and review these interesting release choices, starting with another title from label-favorite pianist Emil Gilels.

It's been nice to see this series tackle some further works by Edvard Grieg (1843-1907). The Norwegian composer might have recognition due to his popular Peer Gynt Suite melodies, but outside of that his compositions don’t receive much play in the 21st century, at least in North America. I’ve already reviewed one release from this series, which coupled the aforementioned ‘Peer Gynt’ with the lesser-known ‘Sigurd Jorsalfar’ incidental music. Well now we get another gem from the composer that to me exemplifies Scandinavian romanticism.

Grieg was an accomplished pianist prior to his work as a composer. Raised in a musical household, he started piano lessons with his mother Gesine before enrolling in the Leipzig Conservatory as a piano student at age 15. Even before his graduation he debuted on the stage as a concert pianist. After starting his career he began composing piano-based chamber works such as his Piano Sonata Op. 7 (1865) and Violin Sonatas No. 1 and 2 (1865 and 1867). But it was his Piano Concerto in A minor Op. 16 (1868), written when the composer was 24 years old, that launched his renown as a composer.

Edvard Grieg (1843-1907) as a young man

I’ll admit, I’d barely heard any of the Lyric Pieces by Grieg before this review. I say any of, because there’s a lot of them. Grieg published 10 volumes of solo piano works under the name ‘Lyric Pieces’ between 1867 and 1901. Those 10 volumes contain 66 short character pieces which typically last anywhere between one to five minutes in length. Recordings and performances of the complete set do exist, but they are uncommon, and it is more usual for the performer to select a program of the short pieces that suits their programmatic taste. There are a few selections that have proven memorable or popular in our musical consciousness, particularly Book 8, No. 6 the Wedding Day at Troldhaugen (1897) which is a frequently performed concert piece (pianists love it for encores) and used widely in film, television, and even video games.

For the selections here, performed by eminent Russian virtuoso Emil Gilels, the pianist has avoided the more common picks favored by performers, even forgoing the Wedding Day entirely. The peculiarity of this recording however, goes beyond programming. Recorded in June of 1974 at Berlin’s Jesus-Christus-Kirche (I would love to know the recording setup here because the sound and instrumentation is such a wild departure from orchestral recordings I have heard done in this space), this performance represents a shockingly intimate rendering from a concert pianist at the height of his fame. Gilels at this point in his career, was the definition of virtuoso, and known primarily for his large-scale performances of romantic concerti. Followers of this series might know his prowess from the previous original source reissue of his Brahms Piano Concertos which were so fiery that they actually caused issues with the cutting (read here)!

Emil Gilels (1916-1985)

So then, why did a hot-blooded Russian pianist emerging onto the world stage with Beethoven, Brahms, and Liszt making up the vast chunk of his repertoire, want to record a selection of simple Norwegian character pieces often thought to be for novice pianists? Well, the works contain numerous references to Norwegian folk tunes. Gilels originally discovered these works while trying to track down a specific Norwegian folk work he heard, and discovered it in these Opuses by Grieg.

Gilels saw the musical value in these works at a time when few other pianists of his stature would take them seriously. He was initially apprehensive if anyone in the classical record-buying public would even want to hear these works. He’s reportedly quoted as remarking “No one will buy this, because no one is interested in these little pieces.” With that picture in mind, it is not only remarkable that this record was made at all, but also that it was this recording that Deutsche Grammophon chose above many others for reissue in this series.

If you are familiar with Gilels’ recordings, the playing on this LP may surprise you. Right from the get go, with the opening piece ‘Arietta’, we are introduced to a side of the pianist that is intimate, thoughtful, and artistically refined.  It would be easy I think, for a pianist of Gilels’ skill and stature, to ramrod their interpretation over the music Grieg has composed here. Walter Gieseking recorded an interpretation in this spirit in years prior, and while it is a great performance, it leaves a lot of the artistic intentionality of Grieg’s score in the dust.

This performance demonstrates Gilels’ reverence for Grieg’s writing, and he plays on this recording with a transparency that makes you think you are listening to the composer himself. Gilels has two hallmark skills up his sleeve as a pianist, power and technique, but he doesn’t let either override his performance on these works, and he only shows his hand when the music calls for it, such as on the folk dance ‘Halling’ where the performer really opens up the power and sound of the instrument for the first time in the set. Otherwise he lets his sound float like petals on the wind, playing the lines with poise and delicacy.

If this set had the famous ‘Wedding Day’ number on it, it would be the only set of the Lyric Pieces you’d likely ever need, but despite that omission this represents probably one of the most refined chamber performances reissued so far in The Original Sound Source Series. The sound quality far exceeds some of the earlier piano recordings pressed in this series, and is in league with some of the best piano tone I’ve heard on record. Dynamic range is also excellent and compliments the fine range of tone color and character Gilels portrays throughout these short character pieces. It won’t shock you the way a Prokofiev cadenza might, but as far as recreating the sound of the instrument in my listening room, and more importantly, getting across the musical affects intended by the performer, this LP succeeds immaculately.

But there is one slight problem, and that is the noise floor.  This album is one of delicate music, and quite frankly the pressing quality from Optimal on my promo copy was simply unacceptable for music this quiet and sublime. I’m not particularly sensitive to minor pressing noise, but the constant noise floor of this pressing was more what I would expect from my 60s Mercury LPs, not a new modern audiophile reissue. My hope is that with the continued success of the series, DG can assert some greater control over Optimal’s quality control, because the mastering and cutting here is really first rate and raises the bar on an already excellent series. If you buy this record, and I still think you should, make sure you buy from a seller that can ensure replacement copies if you get one with pressing noise like mine. If I could hear this record on quiet vinyl perhaps I would grant it a 10 in sound.

Music

Sound

 

 

Up next was possibly the most exciting release (for me) from DG in quite some time, and that is the analog revival of Archiv Produktion, the early music arm of Deutsche Grammophon started in 1948. Archiv predated the popularity of the early music movement, known in musicology circles as “Historically Informed Performance” (commonly abbreviated as HIP), releasing many works of baroque composers such as Bach, Handel, and Corelli in the 1950s and 60s, and even dipping their toes into medieval church music. This was an exciting time for musicology and these recordings represented some of the earliest widespread dissemination of many of these works and composers (Bach was ubiquitous even in the 50s, but other composers of the 16th-18th centuries were often not). 

Archiv Produktion releases were also unique in their quality of packaging and documentation, as many contained extensive liner notes by musicologists that really get ‘into the weeds’ at a level not seen in many commercially released recordings up until that time. Propelling the success of Archiv were primarily Bach recordings by organist Karl Richter, who has one of the most extensive discographies of any 20th century classical musician, much of which is on the Archiv label. Richter became the organist at St. Thomas Church in Leipzig (the church where J.S. Bach had spent most of his career) at a relatively young age and eventually founded the Münchener Bach-Orchester in 1954 with which he would go on to record most of the repertoire of the German composer on Archiv. It was through these recordings that Archiv Produktion became synonymous with J.S. Bach’s music.

The St. Thomas Church in Leipzig where J.S. Bach spent much of his career.

However in the middle of the 20th century, the baroque music performance grounds were rapidly shifting. Richter’s recordings, while a world away from the massive orchestral productions of Stokowski and Klemperer, were still done with modern (20th century orchestral) instruments and in ensembles that were perhaps still significantly larger than what would have been used in this music’s heyday. Starting in the late 60s, a new generation of performer/musicologist hybrid would take the stage, adopting replicas of 18th century instruments and utilizing up-to-date scholarship to better mimic what historians believe Bach, Handel, and other composer’s music would have sounded like in their lifetimes.

One musician leading the charge in this new HIP movement was Trevor Pinnock (b. 1946) who founded The English Concert in 1972 and served as its director for over 30 years. Pinnock was heavily influenced by the early experimental period instrument recordings of the 1960s by Nicholas Harnoncourt and Gustav Leonhardt (many of which done in excellent sound on the Telefunken label) and wanted to start an ensemble dedicated to period instrument performance. According to Pinnock, he felt that this was a whole new world to explore and that each performance and recording could be like a discovery.

Harpsichordist and Conductor Trevor Pinnock (b. 1946)

I won’t write an essay about HIP (although I wrote many in college), but I will go over some of the brief characteristics that underpinned the early music movement at this time. The first one already discussed, was the revival of 18th century instruments (or rather, replicas). For woodwinds, this meant flutes, oboes, and bassoons without almost any metal keywork. The bores re-enlarged leading to a wider sound with a much softer dynamic (no need to overpower a 70 piece orchestra). For brass instruments, it meant going back to the days before the valve, and reintroducing pitched horns, often with simple finger holes. For strings, it meant gut strings, different bows, and potentially different hand positions.

The playing style altered too, as these instruments possessed a fundamentally different timbre and texture that both demanded and enabled a different technique. In the 18th century, vibrato was an effect but not a core part of the sound. Now in the 19th century vibrato use became more continuous and the instruments developed with that in mind. This is why I recommend against playing without vibrato on modern orchestral instruments even when approaching this repertoire, as it is unnatural to the core sound of the instrument. 18th century instruments however, have a much mellower, more spread sound (I’m generalizing a bit) and you can hear how this timbre wouldn’t require a core vibrato.

Scholarship grew on tempos as well, and the phrasing structure of this music began to be more understood by the performers. Long, twisting phrases are features that emerge from the music of Beethoven and Schumann, but Bach, Handel, as well as the French and Italians, thought of phrasing very differently and thus melodies and rhythms gained more brevity. The results of all this, an attempt to recreate a much older sonic aesthetic (I’ll let the musicologists fight it out on if they succeeded), yielded a sound that is much quicker, lighter, and more energetic than the musical approaches that came before.

Now there’s lots of variation of preferences, and scholarly infighting buried in that brief summary I just gave you, but if you want a very simple demonstration of how the HIP movement has shifted trends in Bach performance. Below are three different youtube recordings of Bach’s 1st Brandenburg Concerto. One recorded in 1957 by Charles Munch and the Boston Symphony Orchestra, the next by Karl Richter and the Munich Bach Orchestra done on video in 1970, and finally a modern recording from 2023 of the Netherlands Bach Society.

Hopefully through these three clips you can audibly understand the shift that was taking place throughout the 20th century in the performance of ‘early music’. This is not to say one interpretation is necessarily better than another, but rather to illustrate to a wider audience what made this particular recording by Trevor Pinnock and the English Concert so exciting and new at the time, being recorded on Archiv while many of Karl Richter’s more traditional interpretations were not only still in circulation, but still being recorded!

After all that preamble, I can finally begin to talk about the record we have here, which is Trevor Pinnock’s 1978 recording of BWV 1066 and 1068, two of Bach’s four Orchestral Suites composed between 1724 and 1731. These pieces, labeled in the program as “Overtures” are not overtures in the way we think of them colloquially (ie, a beginning introduction to an opera or ballet), but rather a reference to the French Overture style, which was a musical form widely employed in the Baroque era, often in the service of dance suites. And these suites by Bach are indeed dance suites, as each movement bears the name of a specific French dance that possesses its own unique characteristics such as the ‘Minuet’, ‘Gavotte’, ‘Sarabande’, etc.

Bach was not a frequent composer in this style, which had much heritage in French opera of the late 17th century. The style was popular even in Germany during Bach’s lifetime, but the four Orchestral Suites are the only works the composer penned in this idiom. It is somewhat strange to hear the kapellmeister’s signature contrapuntal writing in this overly dotted style more reminiscent of Rameau, but it’s in this area that Pinnock’s rendition truly excels, bringing out the dance rhythms tied to the DNA of this music. Not only is there a great sense of brisk interplay in the transparent instrumental parts, but there is also a great adherence to beat emphasis that can only come from understanding each dance form and the historical tradition it comes from.

The playing by the English Concert is uniformly fine even by today’s standards, let alone 1978 when learning a period instrument was still informalized and just a bit rock and roll. As an oboist I was most pleased to hear the playing of David Reichenberg who was one of the best recording baroque oboists around in the 1970s and 80s before his tragic passing from AIDS in 1987. The string section is likewise well positioned and imbues a great warmth and character into this performance, avoiding the sometimes cold readings that some HIP musicians were known to give, afraid to inject too much “romanticism” into Bach.

Henry Wood Hall, London

Throughout the first side of this LP, the orchestra sounded rich, natural, and excellently detailed, creating a fantastic image in front of my listening position. But the C major BWV 1066 hardly gave my Hi-Fi an athletic workout as the scale of the music is just not large in either dynamics or scope. Well, BWV 1068 on side 2 is an entirely different story. Here three trumpets and a timpani are added to the score, making the ensemble capable of both subtle air, and relative bombast which jumps out at the listener from the first timpani roll of the first movement. This suite also contains the second movement ‘Air’ that many listeners may be familiar with as the Air on the G string which is an arrangement of this work by 19th century violinist August Wilhelmj.

Now, as long as I’ve been collecting, I’ve always regarded LP pressings from Archiv Produktion as having superior sound to their Deutsche Grammophon counterparts. In fact before I reviewed this disc I retrieved a few of my 70s Archiv pressings and gave them a spin. While some of the trademark issues DG had in the 70s are audible, overall they can be incredibly pleasing and offer rich sonics (even if the strings sometimes do get hard). For instance I played one of my favorite Archiv releases, a 1976 box set of violinist Thomas Brandis and Oboist Heinz Holliger performing Couperin’s Concerts Royaux and Nouveaux Concerts (Archiv 2723 046, hint hint DG…). Despite a little brightness I found this to be a lovely recording of inner detail, dynamic clarity, and timbrel delicacy. I said to myself, if this new Original Source Archiv is anywhere as good as this I’ll be perfectly content.

Francois Couperin's Concerts Royaux (Archiv 2723 046)

Well, this LP blows my previous Archiv pressings out of the water. First of all, the strings have a much richer and more full bodied sound on this new release, but the dynamics are now at live concert levels or realism, this is particularly evident on BWV 1068 which is capable of thunder and lightning when called for. The rendering of Henry Wood Hall is superb, and the engineering strikes a great balance of immediacy and spaciousness. While this session was engineered by DG house engineer Karl-August Naegler, my guess is many of the artistic decisions on sound were made by Archiv producer Andreas Holschneider (who would later go on to be director of Deutsche Grammophon in 1987), and it may very well be his influence that allows these Archiv recordings to sound so uniformly good throughout the years.

Dr. Andreas Holschneider (1931-2019), music historian and producer for Archiv Produktion

I wish I had an original of this particular Pinnock recording to compare the before and after, but either way this is a disc not to be missed, if not for the excellent playing, but also for the sound that will certainly dispel the notion that baroque music is sedate or boring. My promo disc was also much quieter than the previous Grieg, although it helps that this music operates on a slightly larger scale than Gilels’ gentle piano. DG picked an excellent example of the greatness of their early music sub label for this Original Source outing, and my only hope is that they continue to dive into the treasure trove of this catalog.

Music

Sound

 

Comments

  • 2025-12-31 02:35:46 PM

    Wishful Listener wrote:

    Thanks for the excellent review of these works. It's always a fine and joyful learning experience reading these reviews and listening to the music in the LPs.

    Completely agree with the Grieg/Gilels record, the floor noise all over shows its subpar quality for an audiophile product compared to other brands. The saddest thing is Deutsche Grammophon is yet to officially acknowledge this issue, so far they only admit faulty inner sleeves causing surface scratches. Returned the first LP I received only to get a second copy with the same pressing defects. What to do?

    On the other hand, I also agree the Bach/Pinnock record is superb in all senses. This is how all the LPs in the Original Source series must sound! This one is one of the best I heard from the series, certainly one not to be missed. Hopefully DG will look at the differences in pressing between these two records and solve the issue.

    Best wishes for a happy and productive new year 2026!

    • 2025-12-31 06:52:35 PM

      Andrew from Oz wrote:

      If you order through Amazon, order 3 copies, and return the 2 defective ones, unless of course they are all bad lol

  • 2025-12-31 03:38:46 PM

    Swann36 wrote:

    Michael thank you for a wonderful part 1, we are so lucky to have you and Mark writing such educational, engaging, thoughtful and insightful reviews, for me as a classical newbie all the background is invaluable to help my understanding of the historical context of the pieces as well as the performance

  • 2025-12-31 03:58:04 PM

    Josquin des Prez wrote:

    Optimal QA is a real FU mess, and has ruined the TOS experience with defect after defect after defect. I have every title (including these) because I'm so thrilled about the mastering quality and wonderful music, but I have had to exchange a good 25% or more. I have a handful of albums that are still problematic, because I couldn't get good replacements after several tries. I'm stuck with the least of the evils, which is still crap where QA is concerned

    I'm glad reviewers are starting to call out the problems with Optimal's absurd lack of quality, but I have yet to see that DG Classics intends to make it right for those of us that helped make this series such a success. Shame on them! I hope reviewers start to ding them more aggressively.

    • 2026-01-01 05:14:07 PM

      dmk wrote:

      totally agree with your comments. Have had similar experiences with the SUB OPTIMAL - get it? lol, sorry, I couldn't resist - QA process, if you want to call it a process. My miss rate has been much closer to 30-40% returns. I have been ordering from AS, and they have been excellent about returns. The Bach, was a nice surprise, since the first copy I received was fabulous, so no need to return it, for once.

  • 2025-12-31 04:00:10 PM

    Josquin des Prez wrote:

    Wonderful job on this article Michael. Looking forward to the next one. I hope you and Mark keep them coming. Happy New Year!

    I pulled out my copy of the Couperin Concerts Royaux and Nouveaux Concerts to play this afternoon. Thanks for reminding me about it.

    • 2025-12-31 06:43:23 PM

      Mark Ward wrote:

      So glad Michael mentioned the Couperin box (which is lovely and findable for next-to-nothing), and focused on the superior sound quality of OG Arkiv in general, which has certainly been my experience.

      • 2026-01-01 07:57:40 PM

        Josquin des Prez wrote:

        If you like this Couperin look for "Les Nations" with Hesperion XX/Savall on Astree. It is a most delicious dessert. :)

  • 2025-12-31 05:18:34 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Bought and like the Gilels, these Bach compositions (I like a lot of Bach) for me unfortunately are of the too stuffy kind of Bach.

    I really appreciate all these reviews. The only downside to Original Source reviews is that they usually appear weeks or months later, after most of us have already had to decide what to buy anyway.

    • 2025-12-31 05:44:04 PM

      Josquin des Prez wrote:

      I think most (or at least many) of the TOS reviews have appeared before the U.S. street dates (which often lag behind international release).

      • 2025-12-31 06:40:41 PM

        Mark Ward wrote:

        Correct - we tend to tie in our reviews with the US release date, which increasingly seems to be later than the European release date. Often the reviews tend to fall somewhere in between. This also applies to my and MJ's video reviews when we do them. We try to be as timely as possible, but sometimes we get review copies on the late side (but not always), and then we also have other full-time gigs demanding our time and attention.

        On the plus side, our reviews are always well worth the wait, methinks!!! And the records seem to stay in print for a while too.

        • 2025-12-31 07:18:22 PM

          Come on wrote:

          Always worth it…definitely!

          And yes (as some releases had to be ordered early to avoid OOP), I orient myself towards the first announcements, so the DGG site, which, as in this case, was nearly 3 months earlier. I thought you might have a chance to get review samples even noticably earlier than that. But no offense, all efforts are appreciated!

          • 2025-12-31 07:41:53 PM

            Michael Johnson wrote:

            That's normally the case, however in this instance my reviews were complicated by a move and the temporary loss of my stereo for ~2 months!

            • 2026-01-13 12:23:12 AM

              David wrote:

              I'm a, by definition, a BINGE YT watcher & by that I may go a month or more away from my various subject-matter YT CH subscriptions & then "catch up" on 20 - 40+ vids over a weekend, depending my subject interests & mood. I'm (re-watching) your YT "RCA Living Stereo Parts 1-3" vids as I type & have another 6-7 vids of yours cued up. Same for all of Mark's vids; I watched several of his over the weekend with several cued up too. I'm primarily a jazz music listener & vinyl collector, along w/ some blues & some rock, but I began buying Chad's AP (& some Classic Recs) RCA Living Stereo reissues back a decade+ ago along w/ several of, now defunct, Original Recordings Group's 45RPM albums. Your & Mark's & Anthony Kershaw's insights via written article & YT video have been INSTRUMENTAL in my appreciation & enjoyment of my personal curated classical collection over the decade. Kudos to you cats.

  • 2025-12-31 06:34:12 PM

    Mark Ward wrote:

    Ah, Michael, glad to see you were as bowled over by the Bach as I was - and you describe its felicities exactly. Likewise the Gilels/Grieg, which will really surprise those more familiar with his more extroverted manner.

    Unlike you, my copy of the Grieg was dead silent. I have yet to have an OSS title with persistent noise of the kind you mentioned, though I have had two records which were unplayable because of serious scratches, one also having clearly visible scuff marks that should never have gotten past what QC there is on the assembly line.

    I really hope someone at Optimal reads this review and takes note - this is completely unacceptable quality control. I know for a fact that DG is doing all it can to rectify the situation, but ultimately this is on Optimal's head. They are jeopardizing this whole venture, which is a worthy one. Anyone who has been buying these records regularly is familiar with what some of the commentators above have gone through to get clean copies. I consider myself very lucky so far, but the two faulty records I did get should never have left the factory.

    • 2025-12-31 07:02:07 PM

      Andrew from Oz wrote:

      Hi Mark, my friend Anthony Kershaw, had to order 3 copies of the Guilini Bruckner 7,8,9 to get a non defective TOS copy , there were very clear pressing issues with the first 2, it’s a shame because EBS are doing a wonderful job, though the choices seem a bit scatter gun, and not sure if there is some logic behind the choices. Unfortunately, if the continue with the multitrack tapes we won’t get much chamber works because in general the multitrack was kept for the larger ensemble works.

    • 2026-01-01 02:00:28 PM

      Thomas Ream wrote:

      I have purchased all of the OSS titles, and while most have been fine (unfortunately not to the level of the Analog Productions titles), I have had two with major issues where I desired replacement. One was the Abbado Mahler 2, where I was able to procure a listenable replacement, the other was the Abbado Tchaikovsky 4, where I have not been able to. I need to listen to the Gilels Grieg again - I don't recall this having a high noise floor.

  • 2025-12-31 06:50:57 PM

    Andrew from Oz wrote:

    Thank you Michael for your erudite essay. I have the OG of the Pinnock lp, and it has a wonderful picture of the ensemble in Henry Wood Hall covering the whole of the back of the jacket cover, is that not there on the reissue? As I wondered why u showed the rather drab empty hall picture of Henry Wood Hall?

  • 2026-01-01 01:55:48 PM

    Thomas Ream wrote:

    I like this Pinnock LP as well. It is interesting to note how the HIP movement has afffected the repertoire of the major symphony orchestras, at least to my knowledge. Back when I first started to attend live concerts (in the 70's) Bach was a frequent visitor on the programs - I heard live a Bach concerto for keyboard, the complete Brandenburg concertos (led by Lukas Foss - remember him?) and the St. Matthew Passion, all performed by the San Francisco Symphony. I have been to many concerts in this century, and I don't recall Bach being programmed at all, and Handel beling limited to performances of Messiah. It seems like Baroque music has been ceded to specialist performers now....does anyone have a diifferent experience?

  • 2026-01-01 05:37:22 PM

    Jack Pot wrote:

    Is promo equal to white label (WL)? I was lucky to get the Gilels TOS WL LP. I have had the Lyric Suites on a DG The Originals cd for many years. Mediocre sound - I am being kind - great performance. I was not prepared for this TOS WL. Easily amongst the best TOS so far, Gilels the magician conjuring the most subtle of colours and moods, the piano sound beautifully captured. The piano sound is almost on par with the new Pletnev/Chopin/Scrjabin all analogue DG WL LP, an artistic and sonic triumph. The best piano sound - a Shigeru Kawai - in my collection? And Pletnev still has something important to add to a plethoric field. I flagged the rubbish Optima pressings so many times, but Tracking Angle (TA) chickens out of confronting DG. IMHO, TA should stop reviewing TOS until DG switches to a serious pressing plant. I wish TA could listen to side A of my Scrjabin TOS LP: flat, hard and harsh to the point of being unlistenable (side B is much better but still not good). And whenever I A/B listen to an ordinary DG LP vs its WL LP countrepart, the ordinary LP's sound is dramatically inferior to the point of being caricaturesque: hard, flat, poor stereo, random instrument timbre etc... what is there not to dislike? Ordinary Optima pressing is that bad and DG knows it, hence the WL limited series? I hope Decca fares better at Pallas with its new Pure Analogue LP series (let's not be cynical before having listened to a few LPs).

  • 2026-01-01 08:33:29 PM

    Mark Ward wrote:

    Speaking for myself, I have certainly not "chickened out" of anything. Nor do I think any of the other writers covering these releases is somehow failing in their duty to report what they hear. I am not sure using such derogatory language is called for. As I have reported on this site (and in my comments above), my own experiences with the Optimal pressings has been very good, with only two platters having defects sufficient that it was essential for them to be replaced. That's a pretty good track record considering the number of Original Source and other DG new pressings that have graced my turntable over the last few years. Faults were mentioned in my reviews, just like Michael did above. (In addition I had one record with a mild scratch/tick that persisted beyond 8 revolutions - I am pretty forgiving of records, but something beyond that number of ticks, especially in quiet music, is not desirable; I hesitated to ask for a replacement, but finally decided to do so). However, I am highly aware of all the problems others have encountered and have been in regular and persistent communication with DG to do whatever I could to make sure they are aware of those problems and maybe facilitate some kind of solution. Both DG and EBS read everything written here and on the forums. This problem is being very actively worked on, but none of this is straightforward to fix. Do you really think that a label which has invested huge amounts of time and money in a specialized product such as this is blithely ignoring the issue when it threatens to derail the entire enterprise? Do you really think it is responsible for a serious critical journal such as this one to simply veto coverage? In fact we are reporting EXACTLY what our experience is - as did Michael J. above. As I commented above as well, my copy of the Bach is perfect - as it has been for many.

    I have not had the opportunity to listen to the white label pressings offered at a premium price point. I am glad you find them so satisfying, but until I am able to do an A/B comparison myself all I can say I have not found the regular pressings to exhibit the negative qualities you describe. (comment continues)

    • 2026-01-01 08:33:52 PM

      Mark Ward wrote:

      Let me just say that I value your many contributions to the Comments section, and you bring up points which many will be interested in (myself included), but in future maybe a more measured tone and less hyperbole would be appropriate, as would be fully taking into account some of the fact of what has actually been written here before sounding off.

      • 2026-01-02 02:46:51 AM

        Jeff wrote:

        Hi Mark, I would just like to follow this up by saying that of the 28 LPs I have received from the series only 1 has had a mild playback problem (Strauss 4 Last Songs with slight distortion on high notes) and one with an issue that didn't affect playback (Bruckner 9 from Karajan box with label printed off centre). As far as I am concerned this is a decent record and of the other 26 LPs all have been flawless and sound great. Please keep up the reviews, they are very informative and I look forward to future releases!

        • 2026-01-02 06:19:31 AM

          Jack Pot wrote:

          Unfortunately, my experience has been exactly the contrary. Most regular DG TOS LPs I bought exhibit various pressing defects. I tired of mentioning them. However, my experience of DG WL LPs - TOS and not-TOS - is excellent. Coincidence or deliberate policy? What perplexes me is that LPs issued or re-issued by reputable jazz labels exhibit ZERO pressing defects and excellent sound. They can, but DG cannot? IMHO, DG is cynical. It could have solved the issues long time ago by simply moving pressing to the plants these reputable jazz labels use. DG does not, preferring to sell premium LPs with defects (including inferior sound!), and extra-premium LPs without defects.

          • 2026-01-02 02:46:09 PM

            Mark Ward wrote:

            DG can't simply switch pressing plants like flicking a switch. They are part of UMG and UMG's contract is with Optimal. Also, the folks at Optimal have developed a special, proprietary process for generating the metal work, test pressings, lacquers etc. in collaboration with Emil Berliner, and that part of the process they are very happy with. My interactions with DG and EBS have been anything but "cynical" - they are doing all they can to fix the problem. And, like I said, for all the people like you who have had problems, there are many others who have had none or remarkably few.

        • 2026-01-03 05:47:29 AM

          Anders Sørensen Uth wrote:

          Hi Jeff. Can I ask you if you had the Strauss exchanged for a copy that play without the distortion? I have the same issue with my copy, but I’ve so far thought it to be shortcomings of my setup. Thanks!

          • 2026-01-03 07:49:06 AM

            Jeff wrote:

            Hey Anders, I didn't exchange it as it's only a very minor issue (to me at least) - doesn't occur in the Tod und Verklärung tone poem, only the 4 last songs. Initially I thought it might just be my setup (not the most fancy out there) but as I acquired other releases from the series with no similar issues I just assumed it was a pressing defect. Peculiar that we are both having this issue (and maybe we need to both upgrade our setups!). I jest, but hopefully I could be of assistance.

            • 2026-01-03 08:55:52 AM

              Anders Sørensen Uth wrote:

              Thanks for answering, Jeff. Okay, I’m still not sure then that it is a defect of the pressing, but perhaps just a too hot cut. It’s not uncommon for me to encounter similar problems on “audiophile” releases, sadly. I have a nice setup with a Rega P10 and also a Garrard 401 with Sorane tonearm. Both has good MC cartridges installed, but none of them tracks the highest levels without a bit of crackling accompagniyng. It would be great to have the Vier letzte Lieder play problem free as they are absolutely wonderful!

        • 2026-01-12 11:59:50 PM

          David wrote:

          Pretty much my experience w/ "DG Optimal" too and I own all DG TOS but two, & I've returned/replaced two since inception. Like most(?), I hand clean each new vinyl I receive before play from the variety of reissue lables, (DG's, AP & AS, BN TP & CV, Craft Recrdgs OJC, Verve's RC & Vault new series & Rhino's HF & Reserve new series) via my SpinClean Washer. I've been fortunate apparently.

      • 2026-01-02 06:04:07 AM

        Jack Pot wrote:

        Point taken about the hyperbole. Although I actually experience what I write. I now consider DG TOS pressing defaults a fact of life, and will therefore be extremely selective buying TOS in the future (I dread what I will encounter in the boxed TOS issues, which I have yet to open). Regarding the sonics of regular vs WL, just check the cello sound on the recent YoYo Ma Shostakovitch DG LP. Regular: cavernous, disconnected from the player, WL sublime. Why? Ask DG! And Michael got we going with his experience of the Gilels/Grieg recording. I consider it one of the best TOS LPs to date, ruined in his case - not mine, on the contrary! - by poor pressing. L'histoire se répète. Buying regular DG TOS LPs equals taking a gamble. Non merci!

    • 2026-01-02 06:05:35 AM

      Come on wrote:

      Mark, it’s a long time since the WL releases exist, could you please ask DG in the meantime what differentiates them from normal releases? For this information we wouldn’t have to wait until you tried them.

      If I’m not wrong, usually WL are just for sure out of the early pressings of a new (the first) stamper. So they shouldn’t sound better than standard pressings resulting from early pressings of a later stamper (given the mother isn’t worn after the first stamper).

      So until further notice, I have no clue why the WL should sound better (didn’t try one yet).

      • 2026-01-02 02:47:50 PM

        Mark Ward wrote:

        I will ask - but your understanding of what differentiates WL promos from the regular pressings is the same as mine.

        • 2026-01-04 01:06:15 PM

          Come on wrote:

          I got an answer regarding WL from another very experienced audiophile reissue manufacturer.

          It seems as we understood. Yes, WL sound better than late (of a stamper) normal pressings. But: the 5th WL of the first stamper should sound the same as the 5th pressing of a later stamper. The thing is, with a WL you know for sure you get an early pressing of a stamper and only some of us accidentally have early pressings of another stamper which sound the same (or … if it’s an earlier pressing of a later stamper…even better)

          So it makes sense to buy a WL of a favorite recording, but it’s quite expensive to buy them for a whole series.

          Labels could maximize their profit by selling all early pressings of each stamper for a higher price, but this would mean, the pressing plant would have to care for a sorting process they wouldn’t do without taking more money.

        • 2026-01-09 01:19:52 PM

          Come on wrote:

          I had nearly an hour talk with the most meaningful person for this question regarding those WLs. I can't tell who and I can't tell details, I just say, I keep buying the normal releases.

          Independent of this, a common differentiation of test pressings and white label pressings (in my understanding valid at least for mass production record pressing) is:

          Test pressings are very few (usually single to low two digit) pressings, which are reviewed by the label for pressing defects. They are potentially rather worse than better pressings compared to the later mass production.

          WL pressings are a limited run of pressings (any number), formally intended for promo DJ use without the full cover art for optional custom design of the cover art by any person close to the artis, DJ or label. Their value is the limitation and the optional individual cover art. They come out of the normal pressing process and are just a limited edition.

          Again independent of this, so far the answer from any record plant I recently asked about potential differences between the sequences of pressings from a stamper was: as long as we're not speaking of numbers above say the 1500th pressing, differences are a myth of audiophiles, as the accuracy of the stampers is on molecular level for an extremely long time and they wear out by capital damage (and are replaced before that), not by groove accuracy variation.

    • 2026-01-13 01:05:36 AM

      David wrote:

      Can't agree more Mark, "....Do you really think that a label which has invested huge amounts of time and money in a specialized product such as this is blithely ignoring the issue when it threatens to derail the entire enterprise?" There's probably no bigger "worrier concern" with vinyl pressing issues, once valudated, than the reissue lables themselves. But instant pressing plant changes to their submitted 4mo to (used to be 2 yr) planned release schedules are difficult unless they own their own plant. Pressing corrections & QC improvements by pressing contractors are "promised" back to their lable clients every time a real, quantified run problem is documented. It's a challenge to be sure & not that different than an electronic A/V brand, heavily invested in their own new model releases yet relying exclusively on scheduled contracting internal boards/parts MFGs and/or assembling lines of some/majority of their components & hearing of end-user problems as the shipped product hits the street.

  • 2026-01-02 02:50:36 AM

    Jeff wrote:

    I really hope DG continues with the chamber releases - the Schubert Trout is one of my favourites. I think a great candidate for more piano music would be some of the Pollini late Beethoven sonatas, as the other Pollini releases have been quite good so far. I also hope they keep doing their represses - I missed out on a copy of the Gilels Beethoven and have not forgiven myself since!! As always, Michael and Mark, the reviews are stellar and I wish you all the best for the New Year.

    • 2026-01-02 02:51:31 PM

      Mark Ward wrote:

      From your lips to God's ears. Unfortunately one of the reasons there aren't more chamber music releases is that few of them were recorded 4 or 8 track with surround, so aren't necessarily eligible for Original Source treatment in its current incarnation. However, should DG decide to venture elsewhere through the catalogue, that could change. Also, sorry to say, the chamber releases do not sell as well as the big blockbusters.

  • 2026-01-02 06:44:17 AM

    Jack Pot wrote:

    A final note on my part. Don't get me wrong. I hugely enjoy TA's informative classical music reviews which are also a good read. They educate me and help me enjoy classical music even more. And yes, I grew up with Richter's Bach. It opened a world for me. But the HIP movement brought early and baroque music to another level of colour, passion and virtuosity.

    • 2026-01-02 02:53:36 PM

      Mark Ward wrote:

      I agree. And this Bach record is the perfect way to sample the HIP movement at its nascent best.

  • 2026-01-02 12:00:49 PM

    Thomas Ream wrote:

    Mark or Michael - do we know when the latest batch of OSS will go up for purchase at Acoustic Sounds? Abbado/Stravinsky, Giulini/Beethoven, Mozart/Mutter & Karajan, and Ozawa/Respighi? They were announced as ready for pre-order by DG about a month ago.

    • 2026-01-02 04:33:34 PM

      Mark Ward wrote:

      The US release date tends to be later these days. I do not have an answer for you beyond saying keep checking the AS site.

  • 2026-01-02 03:38:11 PM

    EAD wrote:

    Michael, thank you for a very erudite and great article! And, congratulations with your new music room. Thank you also for mentioning the Couperin recording (I have just ordered this one on CD).

    Best wishes to you for 2026.

  • 2026-01-04 10:09:48 PM

    Josquin des Prez wrote:

    I'm playing my Grieg this evening. I had to replace my first copy due to the dreaded Optimal B.S. lack of QA, but the replacement sounds just fine, and it does not have an issue with surface noise.

    Michael, I think you just got a bad copy. Mine sounds fine. I have a high end analog front end. I can provide details if that helps (it's Lyra/Cleardaudio/Boulder).

    • 2026-01-05 02:24:59 PM

      Jack Pot wrote:

      With such a high-quality vinyl front end, do yourself a favour. Buy the Gilels/Grieg WL TOS before it disappears from the catalogue, and compare it with the regular TOS you already bought. I vouch for WL pressing excellence on top of the sonic excellence. Have fun!

      • 2026-01-05 11:02:38 PM

        Josquin des Prez wrote:

        No thanks. I'm not paying triple the price for a test pressing. Those are just early pressings from the same stampers. That's just a marketing gimmick that I don't buy. I've had test pressings from other series before, but I got them for nothing. They aren't worth paying 3x as much. Maybe the TOS ones sound better because they didn't fail Optimal's abysmal QA for the production line.

        DG and Optimal just need to get their house in order with QA. Once they do the production releases should be every bit as good as the test pressings. There is no good reason otherwise to pay so much, unless you expect to flip them for profit (and that doesn't interest me in the least).

        • 2026-01-10 03:03:58 PM

          Jack Pot wrote:

          I completely agree with you regarding the DG rip-off pricing. Why should a WL LP cost 3x the price of a regular, already grossly overpriced, LP? Answer: because some people are willing to.pay that price. I will be one of them. But I will severly curtail buying regular DG LPs. My last batch of WL LPs sounds just spectacular. I regret having bought regular TOS LPs in the past. It is not only about the noisy pressing, it is also about the sonic experience (I know, a noisy pressing raises the... noise floor).

  • 2026-01-05 06:11:02 AM

    Jack Pot wrote:

    A whole backlog of DG vinyl orders hit my shores just before Christmas. First the tedious task of washing them, 5-6 LPs at a time. Then the glorious listening experience. IMHO, WL TOS and WL non-TOS have reached new levels of near reel-2-reel sonic quality. I played the WL Rostropovich-Argerich at least 4 times just to soak up the dazzling presence of Argerich's piano. Elsewhere I commented on the sonic beauty of the Pletnev WL Chopin-Scrjabin record. The best piano sound of my entire LP collection? The WL Pinnock-Bach record? Those timpani! And in general, the rediscovery of fast, lean, dance tempos, expertedly recorded. I immediately followed up with LP passages from Suzuki's festive Weihnachtsoratorium and Harnoncourt's 2nd recording of the Matthaus Passion: Suzuki on a jpc.de LP sourced from a BIS SACD, Harnoncourt on a Warner LP sourced from a Das Alte Werk cd. Sonically Suzuki scores high, Harnoncourt less so (digital artifacts). Both enjoy faultless pressing, both represent a pinnacle in the HIP movement. Hard to believe these performances were recorded almost 30 years ago! I also enjoyed a rarity: the Messiaen LP is a regular TOS LP with faultless(?!) pressing. Sonics are good (not in the WL league mentioned above); I will need Mark Ward's notes to rediscover this music. A nice challenge! I bought one last regular TOS LP: Abbado's Mahler 2nd. The dice have rolled. I will know in a few weeks' time. PS: I noticed that the spindle hole on DG WL LPs is larger than on DG regular LPs. I must systematically enlarge the latter with a Clearaudio gadget to fit them on the spindle of my Clearaudio record player. WLs never have that problem. Maybe WLs are TLC pressed on a different press?

    • 2026-01-07 10:37:00 PM

      Mats Gunnars wrote:

      Perhaps one key is washing, or in my case using a 5 step L’Art de Sol -Loricraft method,

      • 2026-01-07 10:41:43 PM

        Mats Gunnars wrote:

        to access the full sonic potential of any new record. At least that has been my experience. I did have two scarred LPs, but they were quickly replaced by DG. Oh, it is of course L’Art du Son.

        • 2026-01-17 10:14:43 AM

          Jack Pot wrote:

          Completely agree. Washing even new records with proprietary surfactants brings along dramatic improvement of sound quality. Investing in a RCM is a must for every vinylistas.