Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

David Bowie

Station to Station

Music

Sound

Station to Station 1/2 speed reissue

Label: Parlophone/Rhino

Produced By: David Bowie and Harry Maslin

Engineered By: Harry Maslin

Mixed By: Harry Maslin. Assistant mix engineer: Ted Spencer

Mastered By: Ray Staff (Air Mastering)

Lacquers Cut By: John Webber (Air Mastering)

By: Dylan Peggin

January 23rd, 2026

Genre:

Rock Art Rock

Format:

Vinyl

David Bowie’s Descent From “Station to Station”

The thin white duke returns at half speed

David Bowie’s artistry and career are pinpointed by not just what genre he was exploring at a given point in time, but by the cities of the world in which he found himself. Glamorous London was the hub for Ziggy Stardust, Philadelphia’s soulful streets influenced Young Americans, debaucherous Los Angeles in 1976 gave birth to Station to Station and the Thin White Duke.


The Thin White Duke was an extension of Thomas Newton, an extraterrestrial character that David Bowie portrayed in Nicolas Roeg’s sci-fi classic, The Man Who Fell to Earth. His slicked blonde hair and cabaret attire were far removed from the Kansai Yamamoto outfits and tailored three-piece suits. Beneath the surface, the character radiated a darker aura. Cocaine addiction delivered Bowie to new paranoid heights, with the former glam star at one point remarking that ‘Adolf Hitler was one of the first rock stars,’ and another time supposedly giving a Nazi salute while greeting fans at London’s Victoria Station—though he denied it saying a photographer caught him "mid-wave". His interest in the occult intensified. Between these events and his later having no recollection of recording Station to Station, this was certainly Bowie's lowest point. He later declared that the city of Los Angeles ‘should be wiped off the face of the Earth.’


Bowie's low life at the time stands in sharp contrast to Station to Station's undeniable brilliance. The 10-minute title track, one of the album's most adventurous pieces, exhibits elements of his newfound admiration for krautrock. The Thin White Duke emerges amidst washes of industrial noise and the chugging of a synthesized steam locomotive, spewing cryptic lyrics referencing Shakespeare’s The Tempest, Kether to Malkuth—the highest and lowest spheres on the Kabbalistic Tree of Life, and English occultist Aleister Crowley; he swears, ‘it’s not the side effects of the cocaine.’

Perhaps because his marriage was breaking up, or inspired by meeting Nina Simone who'd covered it a decade earlier, Bowie chose to record Dimitri Tiomkin and Ned Washington's dramatically romantic "Wild is the Wind" from the film of the same name first recorded for the soundtrack by Johnny Mathis.

Amidst the insanity of his drug-induced haze, a track like “Word on a Wing” almost feels like a cry for help (‘Lord, I kneel and offer you my word on a wing, and I'm trying hard to fit among your scheme of things’). “Golden Years” and “Stay” are edgier renderings of the funk and soul sound Bowie explored on Young Americans; the former became a Top 10 hit on both sides of the Atlantic. Regarded as the album’s weaker spot, “TVC 15” is a quirky piece of comedic relief, that tells the tale of a girlfriend being eaten by a television set against an upbeat fusion of doo-wop and new wave. 


The Thin White Duke marks musical time for simply being a get-up— one of David Bowie’s rock and roll masks, with no great significance. The character had little chance to impact pop culture and become immortalized on celluloid, ala the Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders from Mars concert film. Rather, the Thin White Duke vanished into space, like Major Tom in “Space Oddity.” After supporting Station to Station on the Isolar tour, Bowie decamped to Berlin to both kick his drug habit and explore another realm of experimental music, that become incorrectly referred to as ‘the Berlin trilogy.’ Station to Station garnered worldwide sales of over 3 million and is regarded as one of Bowie’s most important and greatest albums. 


Station to Station is the latest Bowie album to receive the half-speed treatment for its 2026 50th anniversary. It follows the same template as every album since Ziggy Stardust launched this series: faithfully replicated artwork, sourced from Ray Staff's 192kHz digital file remasters (the same source as the decade earlier regular reissue). An OBI mentions the Neumann VMS80 lathe and recapped electronics. 


I referenced an original US pressing of Station to Station mastered by Allen Zentz before approaching this reissue. What the original lacked in bass output was more than compensated for by its airy and open but not bright top end that produced great detail and three-dimensional instrumental imaging.

This half-speed cut by John Webber noticeably boosts the lower mid to bottom end, overcompensating for the original's lack of weight, while compressing, hiding and all but eliminating finer details and the original's transient clarity. More weight on bottom sounds great in theory, but the excess leaves George Murray’s bass runs on “TVC 15” and Dennis Davis’ intricate kick drum patterns on “Stay” sounding muddy and sluggish, which seriously diminishes the original's snappy rhythmic authority.

After a few songs, the heavy handed application of lower end EQ becomes obvious and somewhat monotonous and you hear "bass", more than the instruments that are supposed to be producing it. The spectral balance is "off". The result is a less engaging and less enjoyable listening experience. There's less Bowie and more EQ.

Bowie’s varying dynamic inflections and vocal textures easy to hear (and enjoy) on the original pressing here are obscured. The natural and artificial vibrato on “Wild is the Wind” become borderline fatiguing after a while. Some of the guitar tones and textures sound tampered with and limited. Immediately noticeable on first 1/2 speed mastered play, for instance, was how the electric lick on the introduction to “Stay” sounds shrilly instead of liquid, and the rhythmic acoustics on “Golden Years” are not only grating but also almost inaudible. Roy Bittan’s piano runs on “TVC 15” sound muffled and lack the desired percussive impact. The EQ preference also manipulates the tonality of some of the instrumentation, such as the handclaps on “Golden Years”, which end up sounding more like finger snaps.

These individual examples may sound picayune but the overall effect of what's been done almost produces an unrecognizable version of an iconic album.


Could the original tapes be in such poor condition that the only feasible option is to use these Ray Staff remasters? Usually top end detail and air diminishes over time. Perhaps that's the problem here and nothing can be done to bring it back but then why compound the problem by pushing up the bass, which only obscures the top?

If the tapes are in such poor condition they can't be used to directly cut lacquers perhaps a new digital master can be produced using the latest analog to digital converters. Celebrating the 50th anniversary of one of Bowie's most loved records with a ten year old digital master does it a disservice, unless the problem is the equalization, in which case that revision does the disservice. Either way, Bowie's catalog is not getting the sonic respect it deserves.

A special thanks to Michael Fremer for allowing me to conduct the pressing comparison on his stellar setup! (I did not put 'sonic words' in DP's aural mouth_ed.)


Music Specifications

Catalog No: DBSTS 50 / 5021732811189

Pressing Plant: Optimal Media GmbH

SPARS Code: AAD

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 180 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: 192kHz restored masters

Presentation: Single LP

Comments

  • 2026-01-23 06:10:58 PM

    Mark Ward wrote:

    Well, that answers my question...

    • 2026-01-23 06:13:08 PM

      Mark Ward wrote:

      RIP my favorite Bowie album... I'll be sticking with my UK OG. I wonder how it compares to US OG?

      • 2026-01-23 06:36:20 PM

        Malachi Lui wrote:

        i haven't heard the UK original but the US original is the true original for this one as 'station to station' was mixed in LA and taken over to allen zentz mastering for the original US cut. i haven't heard this new half-speed reissue either but it seems like the bowie half-speed series gets worse with each album.

    • 2026-01-23 06:13:28 PM

      Tomato Sandwich wrote:

      Does anyone have ideas about why the half-speed stuff generally sounds awful?

      • 2026-01-23 06:38:42 PM

        Malachi Lui wrote:

        there's a scientific reason why the old half-speed stuff sometimes sounded less than ideal (half speed cut = frequencies divided by half when cutting = no bass upon normal speed playback), but for current stuff, it really all depends on mastering choices. and as i explained in my lengthy two-part feature a few months ago, the mastering choices throughout parlophone's bowie series have been consistently bad.

        • 2026-01-26 10:27:09 AM

          Jeff 'Glotz' Glotzer wrote:

          This. Thanks for those explanations as well. They were very helpful. And SMH at Parlophone...

  • 2026-01-23 09:42:47 PM

    Todd wrote:

    Why is it incorrect to call Bowie’s next three albums the Berlin Trilogy?

    • 2026-01-24 12:11:54 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      dylan isn't exactly wrong when he says it's 'incorrect' to call the low/"heroes"/lodger run 'the berlin trilogy.' "heroes" was the only album recorded and mixed entirely in berlin at hansa tonstudio. low was mostly recorded at the château d'hérouville in france, then 'weeping wall' and 'art decade' and vocal overdubs were done at hansa. lodger wasn't even developed in berlin at all, it was recorded at mountain studios in montreux then later the record plant in new york.

      so yes, while it's perfectly valid to refer to those three albums as 'the berlin trilogy,' it's technically incorrect historically/geographically.

      • 2026-01-24 07:50:33 AM

        Todd wrote:

        Thanks Malachi. That makes sense factually, but these kinds of things take on a life of their own. Berlin is a state of mind!

  • 2026-01-23 11:35:35 PM

    Silk Dome Mid wrote:

    One of the most interesting parts of Cameron Crowe's recent book "The Uncool" is his recounting of the time he spent hanging with Bowie in Los Angeles as he descended into addiction. confusion and depression. Druggies especially liked Crowe because he never used any of their stash.

  • 2026-01-24 10:37:22 AM

    PeterPani wrote:

    There must be reel copies sent to radio stations or promotions. If the master is in such a bad shape, why not ask the public, whether somebody owns a good second generation copy?

    • 2026-01-24 12:50:39 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      Tape copies aren't sent to radio stations but perhaps one was sent to a mastering house for an overseas release and maybe that tape could be used, or this one might be good enough to cut with but Parlophone didn't want to spend the extra $ to fetch the tape and start over.

      • 2026-01-24 05:37:52 PM

        PeterPani wrote:

        I was guessing that sometimes tape copies might have been sent to big radiostations, too. So, they all played vinyl back then.

  • 2026-01-24 12:48:18 PM

    Michael Fremer wrote:

    Thank you Malachi for answering questions while I attended the Mahwah Record Riot this morning where I bought only a few records.

    But your explanation of 1/2 speed tech issues needs clarification! Cutting at half speed means the tape plays back at 1/2 speed (15 IPS for 30IPS master, etc.) and the lathe runs at half speed 16 2/3. It means a 30Hz musical signal requires the cutting amplifier to drive the cutter head it at 15Hz, BUT remember! Because of the RIAA curve bass is seriously attenuated and "shelved" below 50Hz. so it's not as if the cutting amp is seriously "stressed" and the cutter head can cut 15Hz. The cut lacquer played back at 33 1/3 should reproduced the full range that's on the tape unless it was attenuated or filtered for some other reason. Stan Ricker (bass player) regularly boosted bass on many original Mo-Fis so if you have "Sticky Fingers" for instance there's PLENTY of (excessive) bass.... as there is on this cut of "Station to Station".

  • 2026-01-26 06:31:51 AM

    Johan wrote:

    The 2010 EMI deluxe box had an AAA cut from the masters and sounds great and much better than the version in the Who Can I Be Now? box set. This is from the liner notes:

    'Cutting Station to Station was quite special as we cut from the original 1/4" master tape with completely analogue signal path (Advanced Head Cutting) as they would have done originally when it was first cut. The tape machine has two playback heads and a series of rollers. The first (The Advanced Head or Control Head) to control the lathe (pre listen) and the second is the signal that gets cut (Program Head) onto the lacquer. The path the tape takes is dependant on the cutting speed and tape speed and is a very "hands on" affair.'

    • 2026-01-27 04:28:33 PM

      Mark Ward wrote:

      i've often wondered what the cut in the box to which you refer compares to OG US and UK... anyone?

      • 2026-01-29 02:09:24 AM

        Malachi Lui wrote:

        haven't heard the 2010 box but i've been eyeing it for ages. one of these days i'll take the plunge so i can hear the AAA vinyl. the 96/24 digital transfer in that set is the best digital version of 'station to station.'

  • 2026-01-28 12:43:43 PM

    tony a wrote:

    Thank you for pointing out the flaws in this release, much appreciated. However, music a 9...music a 9...music a 9... music a 9

  • 2026-01-31 03:10:07 PM

    Will wrote:

    Just wondering if you think Analog Planet got a different version to review or have they just got a different audio benchmark or preference?

    • 2026-02-01 01:31:02 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      oh they got the same pressing! but they must've not had a US RCA original to properly compare. yet i find it hard to believe that the reissue is better than the original french pressing they referenced. the people who currently run analogplanet seem to praise everything that the labels send them, i haven't paid super close attention but i don't recall seeing any critical reviews there in the last couple years.

      • 2026-02-03 07:18:19 AM

        Robert Nakata wrote:

        Thank you for this review and extra input regarding this Bowie reissue. I, too, find the current analogplanet very non-critical, beyond the pale of reviewer bias. And the writing has become cut-and-paste, template structure: acknowledge the original (or like) then heap seemingly blind praise on the reissue. No nuance of comparison - as with this site.