Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

Queen

Queen II (2026 Mix)

Music

Sound

Queen II Remix

Label: Hollywood Records/EMI

Produced By: Queen, Roy Thomas Baker, and Robin Geoffrey Cable

Engineered By: Mike Stone

Mixed By: Justin Shirley-Smith, Joshua J. Macrae, and Kris Fredriksson

Mastered By: Adam Ayan (Ayan Mastering)

Lacquers Cut By: Miles Showell (Abbey Road)

By: Dylan Peggin

April 7th, 2026

Format:

Vinyl

“Queen II” Goes From Sounding Dense to Breathing Freely

The Plangent Process is the secret ingredient!

From the moment Queen broke onto the music scene in the early 1970s, they were almost light-years ahead of their contemporaries. Their own brand of ‘regal rock’ was fearless, testing the boundaries of recording technology by layering harmonies and instrumentation. As if their self-titled debut from 1973 was a raucous slab that honed in on Queen’s initial hard rock foundation, the follow-up would become a major sonic leap. 


Queen II, released in March 1974, was as far removed from the typical ‘sophomore slump’ stigma that plagued many rock discographies. Some of the material dated back to the pre-Queen band Smile (“White Queen (As It Began)”) and was purposely set aside so the group had the proper time & freedom to execute them properly in the studio. The album’s thematic material was consciously divided into Brian May’s emotive compositions (Side White/1) and Freddie Mercury’s darker, fantasy-driven excursions (Side Black/2). 


Queen raised the ante of their original harder-edged sound on “Father to Son” and “Ogre Battle,” pointing the way towards heavy metal. Brian May and Roger Taylor came more into their own, singing lead on their own compositions, “Some Day One Day” and “The Loser in the End,” respectively. “The Fairy Feller’s Master Stroke,” inspired by Richard Dadd’s painting of the same name, is technically imposing, which Taylor calls ‘Queen’s biggest stereo experiment.’ The album’s shining moment is “The March of the Black Queen.” Its quasi-operatic approach would lay the blueprint for what became “Bohemian Rhapsody” on A Night at the Opera


Critics were never favorable disposed towards Queen in the early days, so reviews for Queen II were perplexed at best. Nonetheless, it was the group’s first Top 5 album in the UK and “Seven Seas of Rhye” became the group’s first UK hit. It’s an album that band members look back on with fondness and admiration, and makes for an obvious successor within the current series of Queen remixes that launched in 2024 with Queen I (which you can read about here). Mick Rock’s iconic album cover, inspired by Marlene Dietrich and brought to life in the “Bohemian Rhapsody” music video, looks darker but more effectively captures the chiaroscuro effect. Whereas the cover is striking for its use of darkness and light, the gatefold spread of the members draped in white is a softer-looking contrast. The white/black schtick also integrates itself within the printed inner sleeve and center labels. 


One of Queen II’s production trademarks is its use of numerous overdubs to the point that the tape oxide had worn off completely, almost making the album too ahead of its time. The ability to spread each element across a depth-enhanced stereo spectrum is this remix’s ultimate advantage. “The Fairy Feller’s Master Stroke” brings out more harpsichord and reveals guitar licks that were once obscured in the original mix. The acapella falsetto/harmony section of “The March of the Black Queen” never sounded so full and spacious as it does now; arguably one of the finest moments Queen ever laid to tape. These tracks are smoother-sounding and finally have space to breathe. 

What sounded like a dense wall of instrumentation on “Father to Son” now comes across as a Brian May guitar orchestra, revealing underlying rhythmic acoustics and harmonized parts that are both singled out and mesh majestically together. Some of May’s guitars provide more crunch, enhancing the metallic element on the grotesque “Ogre Battle.” Roger Taylor’s snare drum sounds slightly tweaked, but the rest of his kit sounds authentic to the original. His fills are more dynamically boisterous, and his kick-drum/crash-cymbal accents are sharp enough to snap the listener’s attention consistently. John Deacon’s bass runs, particularly the ones on “Some Day One Day,” sound more punctual than rounded. The power and gusto in Freddie Mercury’s vocals are magnified to a high degree and draw more focus than before. 

The secret sauce that makes this remix of Queen II shine is the Plangent Process. Before Queen’s long-standing audio team of Justin Shirley-Smith, Joshua J. Macrae, and Kris Fredriksson rebuilt this album from scratch, each of the multitracks–including the ones bounced from one reel to another–was fed through Jamie Howarth’s restoration method that fixes flaws that are seeped and locked into analog recordings. The playback results in hearing a given voice/instrument with the clarity akin to hearing it straight off the microphones, which helps magnify many of Queen II’s intricacies. As much as analog purists worship the idea of working via analog materials, this DIGITAL step provides a much clearer representation of what the band and producers/engineers heard in the studio as it was being captured to tape. 

The 2024 Queen I remix was an attempt to bring its flawed production value to May and Taylor’s liking. Digitally retouching drums and pitch correcting vocals made it more of an artificial rendering than a fresh approach to a period piece. Although intentions were in good faith, it was a questionable precedent if future releases were approached in the same fashion. Now, this new mix of Queen II proves that a rocky start doesn’t set the tone in perpetuity. If the Plangent Process can be utilized for re-representing Queen’s classic catalog, the effect of hearing these albums for the first time all over again would ultimately be achieved. 


Special thanks to Jamie Howarth for his insights while this article was being written, and nobody played synthesizer… again.

BONUS: Back in the 1970's TA editor Michael Fremer cut the national radio spots for Queen's first 3 albums. He also cut a pair for Jackson Browne's 2nd album and others. The 3 Queen spots and 2 Browne spots are in the Soundcloud player below. His British accent was horrible.


Music Specifications

Catalog No: 602478438523

Pressing Plant: Optimal Media GmbH

SPARS Code: ADD

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 180 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Presentation: Single LP

Comments

  • 2026-04-07 03:05:54 PM

    Ivan Bacon wrote:

    For the love of Edison, please stop this plangent BS on vinyl. I loath the fact that analog music is digitally bastardized for vinyl records. Keep that on CD or digital downloads and stop F&#k!n& Analog music for vinyl. Yes i am in the minority, but i vote with my dollars and will not pay for bastardized analog music on vinyl. I don't care how much it "sounds better" I would rather have it warts and all in analog. If i wanted crisp, clean soul-less music i would buy digital. Yes i know that digital on vinyl sounds better then digital on CD et'al I have strong opinions on this and respect others views but nothing you can say is going to convert me. Plucking Plangent.

    • 2026-04-07 03:19:41 PM

      Ivan Bacon wrote:

      I should have made this point clear. - It is not a sound quality issue for me. I think it is ethically and morally wrong (a crime against nature) to take a sound waveform and break into little digital bits and reassemble it. I am analog.

      • 2026-04-07 03:37:47 PM

        Silk Dome Mid wrote:

        That's an interesting and valid point of view, for sure. Unfortunately, monetary considerations in the music business have placed ethics and morals at the very bottom of the value scale. It's been like that ever since people started recording sound and trying to avoid paying the musicians what they're worth. Think of all the blues musicians who were recorded and had their work sold without being paid anything. There's also the simple fact that recording music at all alters the pristine nature of the sound. As soon as any electronic device (mics, PAs, amplifiers, tape recorders) enters the space between an instrument or voice the connection between the music and the listener is unavoidably changed. Even so-called "analog" recordings are messed with by many factors such as EQ, multitracking, echo, and even a razor blade employed to splice tape. Personally, I especially hate autotune and I'm not wild about synthesizers. We all have the right to avoid buying recordings that don't fit with our values, but the big money machine will clank on regardless in the pursuit of the almighty dollar and most people won't give a fig as long as they enjoy the result.

    • 2026-04-14 06:18:13 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      there's 'crisp, clean, soul-less' analog as well. digital is just a tool, that can be used for good and bad just like any other tool. many analog recordings sound like shit, many digital recordings sound great, it's all about how those tools are being used.

      plangent has been proven to work. years ago, michael and i compared the doors waiting for the sun analogue productions 45rpm cut from tape vs the 2018 33rpm reissue cut from a plangent-processed hi-res file. the plangent-processed digital remaster sounded better in every way. i choose to use my ears and buy and listen to whichever the best sounding (at least, best that i can reasonably obtain) copy is, no matter the process. i don't see why digitizing an analog recording is 'ethically and morally wrong.' tapes deteriorate too so we have to preserve them somehow, and digitally archiving everything at the highest resolution possible seems to be the best option we have right now. and if you still can't deal with anything involving a digital step even when it sounds better, there are still plenty of all-analog original copies of queen ii floating around out there.

  • 2026-04-07 05:51:22 PM

    Rashers wrote:

    I have lived with this album for 5 decades and have a few vinyl and CD versions (no OG, mind) - and it is my son’s favorite Queen album (I came in when “Don’t Stop Me Now” was in the singles chart and worked my way back to the prog years). I have always felt that the album was muddy and compressed. The new digital remix opens up the soundstage, increases the tonal depth and provides vastly more instrumental detail. It is like listening to a new record. I get that purists prefer these albums to remain “as is” but there are plenty of original mix versions available to them. I didn’t like the remix of “Queen” (now known as Queen I), but this is a revelation.

  • 2026-04-07 06:21:36 PM

    Will wrote:

    Bacon Rashers indeed! Well it is a free world and we can share our opinions (well for some of us can at least and for a few more years hopefully). Personally, (and also true for most of my music loving friends who grew up during Queens heyday) I have considered Queen rather soul-less anyway - a clever and talented show band, yes, but they are well just musically mmmm boring. And as for digitised music, well I mourn the fact that out glorious spider scrawl is now a digitised type face, along with digitised photographs and well the world is flat isn't it?

  • 2026-04-07 09:51:17 PM

    Buzz wrote:

    This reissue is nice but neutered. The EMI original is ok. The us original has the bite required. Do yourself a favor and go right to as clean of a US as you can find. Your melted face will thank you.

    • 2026-04-08 10:37:14 AM

      Rashers wrote:

      Neutered is a good way of describing the previous reissues (particularly the 2015 half speed version). Will seek out the US version - am surprised that the mastering is different.

  • 2026-04-09 02:33:44 AM

    Wishful Listener wrote:

    Thank you for the review. I am just grateful for this new remix of Queen II, my favorite of their albums. Don't have my old vinyl copy anymore to compare, but to me this 2026 release sounds good if you play it loud. I perceived a bit of a metallic sound in some of Mercury's vocals, but not a deal breaker. I like how Taylor's drums sound for most part. For some reason, the cd version of the 2026 remix sounds better than the vinyl to my ears, also this 2026 remix is an improvement over the 2011 remaster.

    I agree this record could sound better in vinyl given the right treatment. On other hand, got the SDE box that splits the record in two LPs, the white and black sides in one vinyl each with etched B sides that look really cool. Looking forward to listen the blu-ray with the high res and surround mixes, hopefully it will be released soon.

  • 2026-04-15 06:17:50 PM

    Lemon Curry wrote:

    Setting aside whatever processing was applied, I can say that the Amazon Music stream of this album is wonderful. Enough so that I'm buying the physical media to take things another step higher.

    The headline, for me, is that the remix is a smashing success. That's the most important thing of all, I feel.