Acoustic Sounds UHQR
Lyra

Pink Floyd

Wish You Were Here 50

Music

Sound

Pink Floyd Wish You Were Here 50 vinyl Blu-ray CD box set

Label: Columbia / Sony

Produced By: Pink Floyd (original album), large committee at Sony (reissue)

Engineered By: Brian Humphries, Peter James, Phill Brown

Mixed By: Brian Humpries (album and archival mixes), James Guthrie and Joel Plante (outtakes and surround), Andy Jackson and Damon Iddins (Wembley recordings)

Mastered By: James Guthrie, Joel Plante and Bernie Grundman

Lacquers Cut By: Bernie Grundman

By: Malachi Lui

January 4th, 2026

Format:

Vinyl Blu-Ray CD

Pink Floyd's 'Wish You Were Here 50' Deluxe Box Set Isn't Perfect

Mostly good, with a few curatorial oversights

Over the last 50 years, enough has been written about Pink Floyd’s Wish You Were Here that I have nothing to add about the original album other than that it’s easily my favorite Pink Floyd album and was the first vinyl LP I ever bought. It’s carefully textured but not too indulgent and meandering, and the lyrics hit the sweet spot between universality and specificity. Never before or after would the band so perfectly achieve this balance, as the earlier stuff can be too ambiguous and indulgent while the later gets too blatantly sophomoric and theatrical.

Crucially, Wish You Were Here 50 is the first Pink Floyd release since Sony fully acquired the band’s recorded catalog. Therefore, reissues can actually come out in a timely manner, rather than getting delayed for three years as David Gilmour and Roger Waters argue over liner notes. While Wish You Were Here already got the super deluxe treatment with the 2011 Immersion box set, the new 50th anniversary goes further to include five previously unreleased studio outtakes (I don’t count the newly-uninterrupted “Shine On You Crazy Diamond” stereo remix as “new”) as well as James Guthrie and Joel Plante’s new Dolby Atmos mix.

After the Atmos listening premiere, I asked if Sony could send me a review copy of the super deluxe box set, which they kindly did. It arrived as standard, sealed North American distribution stock, so no special reviewer treatment.

The Package

The 50th anniversary Wish You Were Here comes in multiple packages spanning the cost spectrum: remastered 1LP album, expanded 3LP with two LPs of bonus studio material, a 2CD set mirroring the 3LP; a standalone Blu-ray with the aforementioned extras plus Mike Millard’s Los Angeles Sports Arena bootleg recording and three surround mixes (Atmos, 5.1, original quadraphonic) of the core album; and the $250 super deluxe 4LP/2CD/Blu-ray/7” set with all of that and more. There’s also a 2CD/Blu-ray Japanese edition in a 7” mini-LP jacket with a replica Knebworth 1975 poster. Even further beyond that, Blood Records and their filled-records subsidiary Bad World released limited variants pressed from a DMM cut by Hendrik Pauler in Germany.

Unlike the 50th anniversary super deluxe Dark Side Of The Moon, which had more elaborate packaging fluff than actual content, the multi-format Wish You Were Here box set is simpler and more utilitarian. It comes in a die-cut glossy black slipcase with the 64-page hardcover book in front (CDs and Blu-ray in the back of the book) followed by foldover jackets for the four LPs (with printed inner sleeves) and a unipak jacket housing replicas of the “Have A Cigar”/“Welcome To The Machine” Japanese 7”, Knebworth 1975 poster, and comic book tour program. The slipcase design is a neat tribute to the original LP’s black shrink wrap, but it’s extremely susceptible to basic handling scuffs and I question its durability. The book seems too heavy for the slipcase to properly support it, as the box is already creaking under the weight and won’t even independently stand up straight on my shelf. The slipcase size and construction would be fine if it was only holding records, but the book will make it fall apart over time with regular handling. Perhaps the front die-cut weakens the box construction too much.

The 64-page book has plenty of nice photos, though for a significant album in a package costing this much, there should’ve been at least one scholarly essay to contextualize why this album remains so important. Of course we all already know the history, but c’mon, it’s not like there’s any mystery to still maintain. The only real text contributions are a borderline unreadable tribute poem by Simon Armitage and Hipgnosis designer Aubrey Powell’s recounting of the album cover photo shoots, extracted from Through The Prism: Untold Rock Stories from the Hipgnosis Archive. Still, it’s really annoying that there isn’t annotation at least explaining what the bonus material actually is and where those recordings fit into the album’s evolution. Now that Sony owns the catalogue outright and no one has to fight over liner notes, would it really have hurt them to commission a decent historical piece?

The design work throughout the set—all done by Aubrey Powell and StormStudios co-founder Peter Curzon, sometimes building from the late Storm Thorgerson’s unused original concepts—is aesthetically thoughtful, even if it doesn’t all match the original album’s uniquely striking imagery. The original postcard is nowhere to be found (though the image is in the book) and the main album inner sleeve doesn’t have the original die-cuts, though the Knebworth 1975 poster and the comic book tour program are well replicated, wise inclusions. Certainly more appropriate than the marbles and coasters from the 2011 box.

Pressing Quality

There are several manufacturing variations across the multiple configurations. All North American vinyl packages were pressed at GZ Media subsidiary Memphis Record Pressing, while Record Industry pressed European stock of the single LP and 3LP sets. Optimal pressed European copies of the big box set. Meanwhile, the CDs and Blu-ray were glass mastered at Sonopress for all packages around the world (except Japan). Why are there so many different pressings? It’s not like tariffs are supposed to affect records and printed materials. Anyway, my copy is the Memphis Record Pressing variant, which is a total crackle-fest with tons of surface noise and patches of audible non-fill that overpower the music. The box set clear vinyl is a nice reference to the album’s back cover, but it’s very difficult to see defects and there are no poly-lined inner sleeves, which for a $250 box set is unacceptable. If you’re in North America and you want the album remaster and/or bonus material on vinyl, import a European copy. Surely the Optimal and Record Industry pressings are significantly quieter.

The Album Remaster

For the main album, I compared the new 50th anniversary cut to the 2011 Doug Sax cut (also from a hi-res file mastered by James Guthrie and Joel Plante) as well as an early A-1/B-7 Portuguese pressing from UK metal parts cut by Harry Moss (“HTM”) at Abbey Road. I also trekked out to Michael Fremer’s listening cave where we compared those with the 2016 Guthrie/Plante/Grundman remaster and an early 80s Columbia US pressing.

Let’s get this out of the way first: despite being cut by Bernie Grundman from the exact same file (the 2016 192kHz/24bit release and the album files in new digital release measure identically on the Dynamic Range Database), the 50th anniversary vinyl is different from the 2016 vinyl. The new cut is cleaner, more open and transparent, while the 2016 cut tries to add lower midrange richness that isn’t and shouldn’t be there. It’s appealing but the highs sound slightly more veiled on the 2016. I wonder if Grundman either EQ’d the file differently for each cut, or if he significantly upgraded something in his mastering system. Similarly, the 2011 Doug Sax cut has that tube-y, distorted sound—again, appealing but not accurate to the mastered file or the tape. Sax’s 2011 cut makes Wish You Were Here almost sound like a folk rock record in how softened and dried out it is. On ‘Shine On You Crazy Diamond,” the 2011 cut makes David Gilmour’s Stratocaster sound more like a Telecaster, as that lean Strat sound gets clouded up with harmonic distortion. So of the past 15 years of digitally remastered vinyl cuts, the 50th anniversary pressing is the best recent Wish You Were Here. (I fully agree with Malachi's sonic assessments_ed.)

That said, the new pressing doesn’t come close to the fully analog cuts. The 50th anniversary remaster/recut is clean and polite and “not bad” and certainly won’t offend anyone. If you’ve only heard the other digitally remastered pressings, this will be an improvement and you won’t know what you’re missing. Yet of the five copies we compared, the UK-cut Portuguese pressing blows the others out of the water. It has a certain delicacy, spatial expansion, and sonic realism that the digital remasters can’t replicate. Synths are enveloping, cymbals have natural decay and don’t sound brittle, vocals sound like a person singing in the room, dynamic shifts are starker… on the title track’s intro guitar solo, you hear a hand moving on an acoustic guitar, while the new reissue sounds thin, processed, and mechanical, like an approximation of a guitar instead of a real guitar. The 80s US pressing doesn’t have the same image heft and definition as the UK-mastered Portuguese pressing, but it’s more expressive and three-dimensional than the reissue, which sounds antiseptic and scrubbed of character compared to the older analog cuts.

Is it a digital problem? Maybe, but plenty of recent digitally-sourced vinyl has equaled or bested older all-analog pressings. I think it’s more likely that the master tape has lost its sparkle. Tape formulations in the 70s degraded a lot faster than earlier tape stocks, and for an album as popular as Wish You Were Here, the tape has been used a lot. Even a new cut from tape might not be as good as the early UK cuts from a fresh tape.

The Bonus Discs

Some artists’ studio outtakes are endlessly fascinating, whether documenting a song’s many stages of evolution (Bob Dylan, The Beatles, many jazz musicians), or being entirely finished, previously unreleased compositions (Prince). Pink Floyd, however, is not one of those bands; with them, it’s kind of “all or nothing” in that there’s either a finished piece of music (or an alternate version very close to the finished product), or a scrap that barely even resembles a song. They also hardly threw anything away, so whatever they wrote and recorded would eventually be used at some point. As such, Pink Floyd have always been pretty selective about what unreleased studio material left the vault, and the bonus studio recordings on Wish You Were Here 50 are interesting but not revelatory.

The Rarities set starts on side 3 (or tracks 6-8 on the first CD) with three tracks already released on the 2011 Experience and Immersion editions: the alternate “Have A Cigar” with Roger Waters singing, a version of “Wish You Were Here” with French jazz violinist Stéphane Grappelli, and “Wine Glasses,” a piece from the abandoned Household Objects project that was used in “Shine On You Crazy Diamond”’s intro. These tracks are decent, but there’s a clear reason why they’re alternates/outtakes.

Hopefully, anyone who buys one of the Wish You Were Here 50 deluxe editions considers “Shine On You Crazy Diamond” to be Pink Floyd’s crowning achievement (it is), because it makes up about half of the bonus material. First is the 19-minute “early instrumental version rough mix,” which lacks the finished recording’s ambient intro and ending, but is otherwise very similar to the album version. There’s also a new uninterrupted stereo mix of the album version, done as usual by James Guthrie and Joel Plante. It has a richer midrange and is admirably tidy, though sounds a little more compressed and less transparent than the original (the channels are also inexplicably switched on a lot of elements).

Beyond that are two versions of “Welcome To The Machine,” titled “The Machine Song,” and two more versions of the title track. At its core, Roger Waters’ initial demo of “The Machine Song” is an acoustic folk song with electronics on it. His vocal performance is loose, a bit rushed, and too emotionally detached. “The Machine Song (Demo #2, Revisited)” sounds a lot more like the finished song, with more synths and vocal delivery similar to how Gilmour would sing on the album recording. “Wish You Were Here (Take 1)” is, again, very similar to the album take. The arrangement is fundamentally identical though some instrumental sections are stretched out and the guitar solos are different. I love the “Pedal Steel Instrumental Mix” of the song, though it’s merely the album take with the pedal steel finally mixed prominently. Overall, the studio extras reveal how simple these songs really are, and how the album is a product of careful arrangements and studio layering. It also probably doesn’t help that there are only four songs on the original album, so there really isn’t much extra to mine.

The two Rarities LPs sound pretty good, a little better than the main album because most of these mixes are less polished and the tapes haven’t been worn out so much. Still, not exactly demonstration quality recordings.

The Live Recordings

“Exclusive” to the super deluxe box set is the Live At Wembley 1974 LP with live versions of “Shine On You Crazy Diamond” (yes, again) and “You’ve Got To Be Crazy,” which became “Dogs” on Animals. I say “exclusive” in quotation marks because these recordings were already released in the 2011 Experience and Immersion CD sets, along with the Wembley performance of “Raving And Drooling” (later “Sheep”), which is completely absent here. Why? Well including it would’ve made one of the live LP sides half an hour long, but it’s a glaring omission no matter what excuse you make. This is supposed to be a definitive deluxe package—it shouldn’t be missing material that’s already been released on other editions. Anyway, these November 1974 performances find Pink Floyd in absolute top form, even if most fans despise the piecemeal release strategy (The Dark Side Of The Moon from this performance was already released on vinyl for that album’s box set, and the “Echoes” encore is locked in The Early Years CD/DVD/Blu-ray mega box set). The 2011 mix by Andy Jackson and Damon Iddins is serviceable, though it’s not quite as clear as other soundboard/mobile recordings from this era (in general, not specifically Pink Floyd).

No multitrack soundboard recordings exist of the 1975 tour, so on the Blu-ray and streaming/download editions, Sony includes bootlegger Mike Millard’s cassette recording from the Los Angeles Sports Arena on April 26. Millard, equipped with a Nakamichi 500 cassette deck and a pair of AKG 451E condensers, would hide his gear in a wheelchair, pretending to be disabled so he could also get a perfect spot for recording. Steven Wilson edited the dead space between songs and restored/mastered the audio from two different transfers of Millard’s original cassette. While you can find these recordings (and probably those exact flat transfers) on peer-to-peer networks, Wilson did a good job making this sound almost like a professional live album. The performances of the Wish You Were Here and eventually Animals stuff are great, though this Dark Side Of The Moon bores me to tears (sorry, I can’t stand these songs being longer than they already are on the LP) and this “Echoes” meanders too much. I do think that Sony should’ve included the Millard recordings on a couple CDs at least in the super deluxe box, but I suppose it’s nice that they officially released them at all.

The Blu-ray

In the box set and available separately for $27 is a Blu-ray with all the audio content except the Wembley recordings. The original album is presented in 48kHz Dolby Atmos TrueHD 7.1, 96kHz/24bit uncompressed LPCM 5.1, 192kHz/24bit LPCM stereo, and 96kHz/24bit LPCM quadrophonic 4.0. The studio outtakes and Los Angeles bootleg audio are also presented in uncompressed 96/24 LPCM. I don’t have a surround setup so I can’t comment on the surround mixes aside from the Atmos mix I heard at the press event. That said, they should’ve actually released the visualizer that they exclusively showed us, as it’s much better than the basic screensaver slideshow that plays over the Blu-ray audio.

The Blu-ray also has video content: three concert screen films by Gerald Scarfe and a 2000 animated short directed by Storm Thorgerson. Two of the concert screen films are for the early section of “Shine On You Crazy Diamond”—one is a sort of stop-motion piece with a reflecting crystal superimposed over cross-dissolving still photographs, while the other is animated, as is the “Welcome To The Machine” video. The audio on these is 48kHz/24bit 5.1 or 2.0 LPCM.

The full-frame 1.33:1 concert screen films are encoded in 1080i AVC with a bitrate hovering between 20-25Mbps (lower than ideal). Compression and (to a lesser extent) interlacing artifacts are noticeable, and film grain is excessively soft and clumpy. It’s the same master used for the 2011 Immersion box set, and the transfer itself is probably older than that. It certainly looks like a very outdated early/mid-2000s telecine scan. This video content isn’t that important and Sony/Pink Floyd management probably thinks that having it preserved at all is “enough,” but c’mon, no one really wants to watch mediocre scans from 20 years ago. They should’ve done a fresh 2K scan and cleanup. Who knows what surviving elements they have for this stuff, but a new scan would have sharper grain, better frame stability, and it’d be easier to remove the remaining scratches and tram lines. That said, the colors on the existing transfers are pretty good, and blacks are deep and inky on my LG OLED. Despite these being old scans, there’s thankfully no magenta push.

The 6-minute Storm Thorgerson animated short film from 2000 looks like it was made in MS Paint. Charming, with some good visual ideas, though obviously clunky. Some pixelation and scan lines, but that’s what you get from basic computer animation in 2000. The audio (a “megamix” edit of various song snippets) for this one is 48kHz/24bit stereo LPCM.

CD Sound Quality

Did I listen to the CDs all the way through? No, but I put them on for a bit, and they hold up well for CDs. Enough that, despite having the equivalent vinyl and 24bit stream just as accessible, I didn’t rush to turn off the CDs. They’re not as good as the LPs and hi-res files but if you settle for the 2CD WYWH 50, you’ll be satisfied enough.

The 7”

Included in the multi-format box set is a replica of the Japanese “Have A Cigar”/“Welcome To The Machine” 7”. Unlike the LPs all cut by Bernie Grundman, the 7” was cut in-house at whichever plant handled the deluxe box sets, so GZ for my North American copy and Optimal for EU stock. It sounds fine for what it is, better than I expected especially for “Welcome To The Machine” being the full seven minutes. “Have A Cigar” is an edit that simply fades early. The artwork scans aren’t very good but the sleeve is printed on thick stock.

Conclusion

Overall, Wish You Were Here 50 is a super deluxe box set that looks nice on paper/online/in theory, but the more you dive into it, the more the oversights become glaring. The MRP clear vinyl pressing is way too noisy for a $250 premium product, the LP jackets should’ve been thicker (my set arrived with seam splits), and the book should’ve had substantive historical analysis. The general issue is that this set doesn’t communicate a clear curatorial intent; great box sets of classic albums and/or archival material can feel almost monumental, while Wish You Were Here 50 just… exists. Without any annotation, the new studio outtakes/alternates feel rather unceremoniously dumped out there, and I can’t tell if the Millard bootleg was included for its contextual value or merely because Rolling Stone published an article in 2021 saying that Pink Floyd should officially release Millard’s recording of this particular show. Really, it’s hard to know if the contents here were carefully selected and assembled from a wealth of material, or if Sony is scraping the bottom of the barrel.

If you primarily want a great sounding copy of Wish You Were Here, skip this reissue campaign and find a vintage pressing cut in the UK. They’re not terribly expensive as long as you’re not hung up on getting an absolute first pressing with all the packaging extras intact. If you want the bonus material, either get the European pressing of the 3LP set or buy the standalone Blu-ray if you have a Blu-ray player integrated into your hi-fi setup. The vinyl sounds a little bit better than the hi-res files, though the Blu-ray is certainly the best value for money (or you could spend a bit more and get nicer packaging with the Japanese 2CD/Blu-ray edition). As for the exhaustive $250 multi-format deluxe box, it’s overpriced for what it is; if you want it, wait a few months and hopefully the price drops below $200. Having the album in three formats is definitely redundant, though I understand the appeal of wanting a hefty box with a nice photo book sitting on your shelf. At least Wish You Were Here 50 is one of the more substantive imperial-era Pink Floyd reissues, which at this point counts for something.

Music Specifications

Catalog No: 19802876741OS

Pressing Plant: Memphis Record Pressing

SPARS Code: ADA

Speed/RPM: 33 1/3

Weight: 140 grams

Size: 12"

Channels: Stereo

Source: Digital Remaster

Presentation: Box Set

Comments

  • 2026-01-04 12:48:35 PM

    Come on wrote:

    Very good and complete review! I just have the old 1980 Japanese Mastersound release (quite sure from digital and not sure anymore how good or not). And maybe I also have the Grundman or Sax release. Ordered the Portuguese one now.

    Well done!

    • 2026-01-04 01:12:37 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      You won’t regret it!

    • 2026-01-04 11:36:27 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      if your portuguese pressing indeed turns out to be the HTM UK cut (there are a few portuguese variants and not all of them are abbey road cuts), let us know how it compares to the 1980 japanese mastersound. the mastersound was cut half-speed by vlado meller in new york, it goes for tons of money and some people regard it as the definitive pressing while others prefer the original UK master. i haven't heard it. my guess is that the mastersound is 'detailed' in a dissected way that might provide the illusion of being 'best' while the UK cuts are probably more cohesive.

      • 2026-01-05 11:19:11 AM

        Come on wrote:

        Thanks! Yes, the Mastersound I have (the one with the OBI and no blue halfspeed writing on top) indeed seems to be really expensive in the meantime.

        Portuguese: According to the engraving ima purchase should be the correct one, but if you have tips how to further identify the right one you’re welcome!

        Matrix / Runout (Side A runout): SHVL 814 A-1 Matrix / Runout (Side B runout): SHVL 814 B-7 HTM

        https://www.discogs.com/release/3801345-Pink-Floyd-Wish-You-Were-Here

        When I compared them I try to find this article again and report back.

        • 2026-01-05 11:21:18 AM

          Come on wrote:

          The even more expensive Nimbus cut could be one of the best, too, I hoped Michael has it for comparison.

  • 2026-01-04 02:49:10 PM

    Lemon Curry wrote:

    A pretty lukewarm review for a fairly pricey item.

    If the lack of sparkle is because the master has seen better days, then it's time for a complete remix. The Animals remix from a few years ago, which I have on vinyl, is stunning. Remix the thing and package it exactly like the Animals box.

    Regarding the Memphis GZ press, this is VERY discouraging. I've had a few winners from there in a row, and thought the curse of the "Czech Republic" sticker was in the rear-view mirror.

    • 2026-01-04 09:27:17 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      i tend to have better luck with czech GZ pressings. they’re not always perfect, but especially when they ship in poly-lined sleeves, they’re pretty clean. even without poly sleeves, they can be adequately quiet. i’m also reviewing the new green day ‘warning’ box set pressed at GZ on galaxy colored vinyl, those discs came in standard paper inner sleeves yet play very nicely.

      the memphis facility is definitely more inconsistent and the records i’ve gotten from there tend to be noisier. and the current crystal clear vinyl formulation that GZ facilities use can be really, really noisy. i have the GZ czech clear vinyl pressing of the 1975 ‘notes on a conditional form’ and it’s so crackly that the equivalent GZ picture disc pressing is actually quieter! i mean you get that picture disc rumble but at least it doesn’t sound like a campfire. for ‘WYWH’, the new box set memphis clear vinyl is just as noisy, maybe even noisier, than my old portuguese pressing (which is maybe VG/VG+), but of course it’s easier to overlook on the old pressing because the mastering is so much more transparent

  • 2026-01-04 03:17:27 PM

    Jeffrey C. Robbins wrote:

    Wow, a lot to digest here, thank you. I, too, just went and ordered a NM- version of what I hope is the correct cut, being Portugal Harvest catalog no. 8E 064 96918. I never had a vinyl version so it’s great to be directed to acquire the right one!

    I have both the 2011 5.1 MCH and the new Atmos digital versions. I use the Dolby Reference Player and the MMH Atmos Helper to convert the Blu-ray rip of mkv files to FLAC 5.1.2 Atmos files so I can indeed here the Atmos mix at home in 24/48 (through Roon!) and not the compressed version. I do like the height addition. JCR

    • 2026-01-05 12:01:34 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      there are several portuguese pressings with the 8E 064 96918 catalog number. not all of them are UK HTM cuts. hopefully your copy is indeed the right one when it shows up! if so, you won't be disappointed. i bought mine three years ago for $25-30 at a record shop in portland, OR (where i lived at the time). i saw an original german pressing there and had it in my stack, then the owner pulled out the portuguese pressing from behind the counter. i saw the HTM etching and instantly knew that was the one to have. the owner hadn't even priced it yet so i got a very fair price on it. that shop (exiled records) is a gem... got many great original pressings there for good prices because a lot of them played a lot better than they look!

      • 2026-01-05 08:37:19 AM

        Jeffrey C. Robbins wrote:

        Oh dear, I think then I did buy the wrong version. Dang! I now see versions with A-1 and B-7 HTM. Do I this take it that only the B-7 side has the HTM etching?

  • 2026-01-04 03:38:20 PM

    Wishful Listener wrote:

    Thanks for an excellent and objective review. The Tracking Angle has become one of my main reference sources for vinyl releases.

    Likewise, WYWH is my favorite Pink Floyd album, so I couldn't pass on the 50th Anniversary box set. Important factor for me was the transparent vinyl and, being a child in 1975 when it was originally released, the Wembley 1974 audio, 7" single, poster and book to have some sense of what was going on back then. In any case this version is superior than the marbles and scarf from the Immersion box. Glad they separately released the bluray and the vinyl versions to give fans options. Hope they keep doing it for their future releases.

    For those of us who are not lucky enough to own a WYWH UK-cut vinyl, remixing and release it as they did with Animals would provide a better sound package than what is currently available?

  • 2026-01-04 03:53:57 PM

    Georges wrote:

    I was more of a Barrettian, but I admit that seeing the Floyd circus fifty years ago was fun. This album isn't as good as DSOTM, but it's still decent; up until The Wall, there are still a few good tracks here and there. Unfortunately, Gilmour's takeover after they did everything they could to get rid of Waters led to some frankly appalling albums and concerts.

    Regarding the item in question, I have the same complaint as you, and I'll even go further: I WANT individual 5" sleeves for each CD or Blu-ray! To avoid scratches. I had the same problem with the series of 8" Elvis box sets, the last volume of which reviewed here (what would we do without TA?). As for the content, there's a lot of repetition, and the vinyl is rather mediocre according to you (what courage to review everything!), I'm not a big fan of Atmos, but oh well, why not. I think there are better concerts on this tour, even Knebworth I think. Here I find the sound very distant, hope with AI in the near future we will probably be able to improve it better (see the Revolver box set). For Wembley 1974, isn't there a complete version with the uncensored "Speak to me"?!

    • 2026-01-05 12:30:24 AM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      beyond the 'hits' i never cared as much for 'DSOTM,' i find it too indulgent for how simple it is at its core. i like 'animals' too but i find most of 'the wall' insufferable (i slightly prefer the live version though). 'the final cut' i need to revisit... and the end-period gilmour stuff i find agonizingly dull.

      technically, the blu-ray in the 'WYWH 50' box comes in its own sleeve, the disc is in a card sleeve that's then slotted into the back of the hardcover book. the CDs are simply in the book without sleeves, but blu-rays are much more sensitive to scratches. that said, i've gotten those round-bottom japanese poly sleeves for optical discs and sometimes use those inside of paper digipak/book packages. especially for blu-rays...

      • 2026-01-05 11:54:14 AM

        Georges wrote:

        When I bought TDSOTM, I hadn't heard anything like it. But I think, like with many bands, you have to see them live back then. That's how I discovered Van der Graaf Generator, King Crimson, and Iggy Pop (especially with the Stooges, actually). As for the later albums, there are some good tracks like Comfortably Numb. But you're right, the band shouldn't have performed or even recorded without Waters, like the Beatles without Lennon?! They should release box sets with the vinyl OR the CDs/DVDs/Blu-rays; my solution shouldn't cost much more. For example, on the quadruple Elvis Back in Nashville set, the CDs are in a fold-out cardboard box where there's still a little room (but I still put them in white paper/clear plastic sleeves). However, for the quintuple Sunset Boulevard set, there are TWO boxes and no room at all; I had to carefully remove each CD with a glove, but thankfully none of them were damaged. I really like Japanese covers and a lot of things from there, but they're often expensive, and they only ship by air at exorbitant rates. An acquaintance brought back several cartridges and a used tonearm (among other things, records too) from Tokyo and other cities. The price was really very low. Thanks for the info; I didn't know Blu-rays were so fragile.

  • 2026-01-04 05:36:01 PM

    Todd wrote:

    Malachi I think it would be worth doing a quick review of what you think this new release sounds like vs your Portuguese disc on a “normal” HiFi setup.

    • 2026-01-04 06:48:19 PM

      Michael Fremer wrote:

      Are you suggesting my system is “abnormal”? Lol

      • 2026-01-04 08:16:36 PM

        Come on wrote:

        This is an interesting topic. Just as one upgrade example: after I added some active isolation platforms to my setup, (not only) the quality of the bass changed a lot to the better, changing the impression of the one or other well known albums’ sound quality (good or bad) quite a bit (many more sound better, some different). I’m aware that, with for example just the active isolation platforms, my setup is probably more or less “abnormal” in quality compared to 98% of other setups.

        I think we all have made the experience (and I read it from you, too, when writing about a few single revised album reviews after years of system upgrades), that the judgement of the sound quality of some albums changed with strongly evolving setups.

        The better the setup, the easier differences can be heard, but imo the assessment of some recordings may be at least slightly different than on an average setup.

        Finally I’m sure this review would be quite the same if made on a setup costing 1/100th of yours, but given the percentage of listeners with somewhere around a mill$ setups is limited and makes me understand the “abnormal” rating ;)

        • 2026-01-04 08:22:44 PM

          Come on wrote:

          Forgot to say that I always prefer reviews on setups perfected as far as possible, as this will be most correct in an absolute sense.

          • 2026-01-04 09:16:04 PM

            Todd wrote:

            I take your point. I just wanted to find out if Malachi would ultimately come to the same conclusion on his own system that he would for sure have the most familiarity.

      • 2026-01-04 08:34:56 PM

        Todd wrote:

        Haha. Maybe the adjective I should have used is “ordinary.” As is your system is extra-ordinary!

      • 2026-01-05 11:55:29 AM

        Georges wrote:

        It must be better than mine (which isn't difficult)!

    • 2026-01-04 07:57:19 PM

      Malachi Lui wrote:

      i listened extensively on my system too! which is above average (rega P6 with ortofon cadenza bronze, liberty B2B-1 phono preamp, hegel H95 integrated amp, mofi sourcepoint 8 speakers) but i still heard the same thing i heard on michael’s extreme setup. but if you’re asking me to pull out the debut carbon and compare these pressings on there, i could probably do that

      • 2026-01-04 08:40:43 PM

        Todd wrote:

        Thanks for the info. The fact that you heard similar things on your own system makes me feel pretty confident in your assessment. If WYWH is your fav Pink Floyd album then I bet you are pretty familiar with how your pressings sound on your system. Just wondered if you had made the apples to apples comparison. Thanks!

        • 2026-01-04 09:20:10 PM

          Malachi Lui wrote:

          my system is no slouch but still costs a minuscule percentage of michael’s system, yet we usually hear the same thing when comparing pressings. the magic of his system is that you hear all the differences in half a second, while it takes maybe 5-10 seconds to notice on mine

          • 2026-01-05 06:37:00 PM

            Michael Fremer wrote:

            "The magic" is that at my age we hear the same things! It's a relief....especially since I know my equipment isn't, can't be as good!

  • 2026-01-05 02:32:58 AM

    PeterPani wrote:

    As always by M.L. a fantastic review! I listened to some of the extra stuff on weekend, and you are absolutely right, saying "overall, the studio extras reveal how simple these songs really are". It struck me, too. Unbelievable, how big in every way the final record sounds compared to alternate versions - with only tiny details removed. Honestly, I am a bit confused. How could they (Pink Floyd) find the way - the sweet spot - to produce such a landmark recording based on those simple songs? And why did I not hear it before, when listening to the finished product so many times over so many years...? I guess, it makes the record more fascinating to me - magic of music...

  • 2026-01-05 11:59:15 AM

    Will wrote:

    👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏